Question · Q4 2025
Andrew Berger asked about the industry concentration within the 2026 bad debt watch list. He also questioned how the 5%-10% re-leasing spread guidance for 2026 aligns with expiring rents versus recently signed rents, implying a higher signing range. He inquired about the year-end same store occupancy of 96.5% versus the 95% average guidance for 2026, seeking clarity on the expected year-end 2026 occupancy. Furthermore, he requested a detailed breakdown of the cash same store NOI guide, struggling to reconcile it with given components, and asked if the Tireco lease impacts cash same store in 2026. He then posed a broader question on the measurement of success for Rexford's strategic changes (dispositions, lower development, lower G&A) given macro factors, asking about the timeline for results and if sustained tepid growth would prompt more substantive board actions. He also sought clarification on the 1% mark-to-market decline trend and whether the "right-sizing" effort would lead to multi-year earnings dilution. Finally, he asked for insights into the disposition market, including bidder pool, pricing, and if the portfolio evaluation is leading to changes in submarket thesis or exits, and inquired about the company's evolving view on port exposure and tariff risks, and the 30% Tireco roll-down's net effective impact including concessions and escalators. He concluded by asking for a walk-through of 2026 sources and uses of cash, specifically the free cash flow available after development spend for share buybacks or redeployment.
Answer
John Nahas (Managing Director of Operations) confirmed a logistics concentration in the bad debt watch list, noting larger spaces and specific business issues related to changing customer rates. Michael Fitzmaurice (CFO) confirmed expected signing rents of $16.75-$17 per sq ft for 5%-10% net effective re-leasing spreads, noting Tireco's 30% negative spread and flat to -5% cash spreads. Fitzmaurice clarified the 2026 same property occupancy starting point is 95.6% (due to pool change), expecting deceleration to a 95% midpoint with Q4 acceleration. He detailed the cash same store NOI components: -100 bps from occupancy decline, -50 bps from NOI margin, -75 bps from lower term fees/Tireco, -50 bps from bad debt, -200 bps from concessions, offset by +325 bps from contractual bumps, totaling 1.5% at midpoint. Laura Clark (COO and Incoming CEO) stated success is measured by "driving outside shareholder returns," emphasizing renewed capital allocation discipline, rigorous underwriting, limited development exposure, value creation, and operational efficiency. Fitzmaurice explained Q4 2025 mark-to-market had offsetting positive (below-market lease conversions) and negative (above-market vacating spaces) impacts. Clark outlined the disposition strategy (opportunistic, de-risking, future repositioning/development sales) aiming for FFO/NAV neutral to accretive growth, with Fitzmaurice adding offsetting cash flow from repositioning/development ($15M stabilized in Q4 2025, $20M commencing in 2026, $33M in 2027+). Clark described the disposition buyer pool: developers for development sites ($135M, $80/land sq ft, 4% projected yield) and users for operating properties ($95M under contract, ~4% cap rate), noting user sales increased in 2025 (average 4.2% cap rate). Clark reiterated limited direct port exposure but noted tariffs influence tenant decisions on expense structures and space rationalization. Fitzmaurice clarified the Tireco 30% roll-down was an apples-to-apples net effective comparison, including rent and triple net charges, due to a shift from triple net to gross lease. Finally, Fitzmaurice detailed 2026 cash sources ($166M cash + $450M dispositions = $616M) and uses ($203M development/repositioning spend), leaving $413M for redeployment or share repurchases.
Ask follow-up questions
Fintool can predict
REXR's earnings beat/miss a week before the call
