Question · Q3 2025
Betty Jung asked about the economic drivers behind the sub-$80 LCOE for Project Permian compared to the roughly $100 LCOE for Northern MISO, including CapEx considerations and carbon credit stacking. She also questioned NET Power's shift from a capital-light licensing model to a more capital-heavy project development model and the strategy for project financing and long-term capital needs.
Answer
CEO Danny Rice explained that Project Permian's lower LCOE is due to West Texas's ultra-low-cost natural gas and the ability to sell captured CO2 for industrial use (enhanced oil recovery) to buyers like Oxy, effectively "carbon stacking" on top of 45Q credits. This contrasts with Northern MISO, where CO2 is permanently sequestered, incurring transport and sequestration costs. Regarding the business model pivot, Rice stated that NET Power is right-sizing initial projects (e.g., 60 MW Phase 1) to manage equity capital requirements, leveraging project financing for proven technologies. He noted that with an expected $390-$400 million cash balance, NET Power can prudently invest a smaller portion ($75-$90 million for Phase 1 equity) by reallocating capital from oxycombustion development, aiming to demonstrate economic projects that will attract further capital for scaling to multi-gigawatt campuses.
Ask follow-up questions
Fintool can predict
NPWR's earnings beat/miss a week before the call