Question · Q4 2025
Cory Kasimov followed up on ACACIA-HCM, asking if US investigators view one of the primary endpoints (KCCQ or peak VO2) as more important, and what constitutes a clinically meaningful change from a physician's perspective for this patient population.
Answer
President and CEO Robert Blum and EVP of R&D Fady Malik explained that co-primary endpoints were chosen for regulatory harmonization, not physician preference, and physicians will consider the totality of evidence. Robert Blum emphasized that for non-obstructive HCM, with no approved therapies, the study will help define what is clinically meaningful.
Ask follow-up questions
Fintool can predict
CYTK's earnings beat/miss a week before the call

