Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

David Saxon

Managing Director and Medical Technologies Equity Research Analyst at Needham & Company LLC

David Saxon is a Managing Director and Medical Technologies Equity Research Analyst at Needham & Company, LLC, specializing in medical devices, instruments, and related healthcare technologies. He covers 19 companies including Azenta, Cooper Companies (COO), SiBone (SIBN), Glaukos (GKOS), RxSight (RXST), STAAR Surgical (STAA), and Dentsply Sirona (XRAY), with a strong track record of 70.9% buy recommendations out of 79 ratings over five years and an average price target met ratio of around 44-51% generating potential upsides of 22-26%. Saxon joined Needham in 2017 after roles in asset management at Merrill Lynch and Baker Avenue Asset Management, holding an MBA in Finance & Investments and a BA in Economics from Boston University Questrom School of Business. He is a CFA charterholder with expertise in financial analysis and valuation.

David Saxon's questions to RxSight (RXST) leadership

Question · Q4 2025

David Saxon followed up on the gross margin impact of higher-cost inventory, asking how long it would take for this inventory to clear and for underlying unit costs to normalize. He also inquired about the traction and early success stories from the commercial pivot, seeking insights into what gives management confidence in a back-half recovery.

Answer

CFO Mark Wilterding stated that the higher-cost inventory is transient and will be worked through over the course of the year, impacting Q2, Q3, and Q4. President and CEO Dr. Ron Kurtz noted early success stories from the commercial pivot, where teams focused on individual practice needs through structured programs, expressing belief that this will continue as they expand to more clinical sites.

Ask follow-up questions

Fintool

Fintool can predict RxSight logo RXST's earnings beat/miss a week before the call

David Saxon's questions to iRhythm Holdings (IRTC) leadership

Question · Q4 2025

David Saxon asked about the timing for engaging innovative channel partners on repeat monitoring, whether it can be standardized, and if internal data supports the value of repeat monitoring.

Answer

Quentin Blackford, President and CEO, explained that discussions on repeat testing vary by partner (e.g., every 12 months vs. every three years) but generally focus on some form of repeat monitoring, driven by the need to confirm diagnosis and treatment efficacy. He noted that payers are recognizing the cost benefits, potentially leading to annual monitoring for risk assessment, with compelling cost reduction data expected to be published later this year.

Ask follow-up questions

Fintool

Fintool can predict iRhythm Holdings logo IRTC's earnings beat/miss a week before the call