Question · Q2 2026
Gowshi Sri asked if Apogee's businesses have observed a shift towards smaller or non-traditional engineering-only projects due to increased competition and slower activity, and if these projects carry different marginal deltas. She also questioned the realistic downside for FY2026 EPS given continued end-market softness, slower Fortify realization, and no additional tariff relief, and what levers could be pulled to mitigate this. Additionally, Sri sought clarification on modeling the tax rate for Q3 and Q4, given the full-year guidance. Finally, she inquired about the Performance Services segment's sensitivity to a potential slowdown or inventory correction in channel partners in the coming year.
Answer
Matt Osberg, CFO, confirmed that increased competition has led to expanding reach into smaller, typically lower-margin projects, particularly in the glass business, to strategically gain volume. Ty Silberhorn, President and CEO, added that average project sizes in glass and services have decreased, leading to more price pressure. Regarding EPS downside, Osberg stated the current range is $3.60-$3.90, with continued upward aluminum cost pressure being a key risk, which Project Fortify II actions aim to offset. For the tax rate, Osberg clarified that after a higher Q1 rate, Q3 is expected to be near 27%, with Q4 dipping slightly to achieve the full-year average. Silberhorn noted that any significant slowdown for Performance Services' retail side would likely occur in Q4 or Q1 (post-holiday inventory reset), but the business's focus on upper-middle-class households makes it less susceptible to broad consumer spending downturns.