Josh Rales's questions to GOLD leadership • Q1 2025
Question
Asked for an explanation of Barrick's higher all-in sustaining costs compared to a peer like Agnico Eagle, and whether significant excess cash flow from high gold prices might fund new projects beyond the current capital allocation priorities.
Answer
Barrick's higher costs are attributed to being largely USD-based (lacking currency depreciation benefits of peers), and significant ongoing investment in assets (e.g., catch-up maintenance in Nevada) rather than harvesting them. Costs are expected to decline as production grows. The priority for excess cash remains strengthening the balance sheet, shareholder returns, and funding the existing organic growth pipeline, not seeking new M&A.