Michael Phillips

Michael Phillips with Oppenheimer asked about the expected impact on core loss ratios from American Integrity's strategy to underwrite middle-aged homes, and how the company's homeowners market experience translates to its new commercial residential product, including market hardness differences between condo and HOA subsectors.

Answer

Jon Ritchie, President of American Integrity Insurance Group, stated that middle-aged homes are expected to perform in line with expectations, though potentially not to the same extent as new construction, but the company is comfortable with projected loss costs. Bob Ritchie, Founder and CEO, assured that the commercial residential product involved 18 months of preparation, emphasizing a measured, profitable approach leveraging existing expertise. Jon Ritchie added that the market for garden-style HOAs remains hard but offers attractive pricing opportunities due to scarce capacity in Florida.

Michael Phillips asked about the expected impacts on core loss ratios from American Integrity's strategy to underwrite middle-aged roof homes and how the company's experience in the homeowners market translates to its new commercial residential product.

Answer

Jon Ritchie, President of American Integrity Insurance Group, stated that middle-aged homes are expected to perform in line with expectations, though not to the same extent as new construction due to loss costs, but the company is comfortable with the premium collected. Bob Ritchie, Founder and CEO, assured that the commercial product launch involved 18 months of study, development, and staffing, emphasizing a measured, profitable approach not focused on dramatic top-line growth, with guarded distribution. Jon Ritchie further clarified that the commercial HOA market remains challenging with scarce competition, but pricing for targeted garden-style HOAs is considered appropriate and attractive.

Michael Phillips with Oppenheimer inquired about Cincinnati Financial's commercial auto prior year development (PYD) charges, specifically how to reconcile ongoing charges with decreasing current picks. He also asked about any worrisome trends in large commercial line losses.

Answer

President and CEO Steve Spray addressed the overall reserve approach, highlighting 30+ years of favorable development and current profitability in commercial auto for 2025. He noted the company's focus on small to mid-market package underwriting, avoiding heavy auto fleet business. EVP and CFO Mike Sewell added that $7 million of the $10 million unfavorable development was from older accident years (2019-2020) and that total commercial auto reserves approach $1 billion. Regarding large losses, Mike Sewell stated that while current year large losses were slightly higher ($34 million) due to commercial property and homeowner, there was no unexpected concentration by risk, geography, or agency, attributing it to normal quarterly volatility.

Michael Phillips of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. asked about the nuanced commentary on commercial lines renewal pricing, questioning if the shift to mid-single-digit increases implies margin pressure. He also sought assurance on the timing of recent reserve releases for general liability.

Answer

President & CEO Stephen Spray clarified that commercial lines pricing remains strong at the high end of mid-single digits and is believed to be outpacing loss costs, supported by 13.5 years of underwriting profit. On reserves, EVP & CFO Michael Sewell detailed the movements by accident year, noting favorability in 2024 but strengthening in older years, emphasizing a consistent and prudent reserving process.

Michael Phillips of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. asked for clarification on commercial lines renewal pricing commentary and its implications for margin expansion, and also questioned the prudence of recent reserve releases in general liability.

Answer

President & CEO Stephen Spray clarified that commercial lines pricing moderated slightly but remains strong and is believed to be outpacing loss costs, highlighting 13.5 consecutive years of underwriting profit. EVP & CFO Michael Sewell defended the reserve releases by detailing the consistent, balanced process across accident years, noting favorable development in 2024 was offset by strengthening in older years. Mr. Spray added that the company has a 30+ year track record of overall favorable development.

Michael Phillips of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. inquired about the specifics of reserve movements, particularly in commercial casualty, and asked about the status of open claims from the California wildfires and the potential impact of tariffs on the business.

Answer

CFO Mike Sewell confirmed that commercial casualty had minimal favorable development ($1 million) and that lower emergence on known claims was mainly from property. Sewell also stated that approximately 65% of the gross claims from the California wildfires have been paid. CEO Steve Spray added that the company is closely monitoring potential tariff impacts and feels prepared to respond given its prudent reserving history and sophisticated pricing tools.

Michael Phillips asked for an outlook on the reinsurance sector following the California wildfires, how Cincinnati Re would respond, and the potential impact on 2025 premiums. He also inquired about a specific dollar increase in personal lines umbrella claims.

Answer

President and CEO Steve Spray stated that the reinsurance market is healthy and Cincinnati Re will 'stay the course' as wildfire losses were within expectations. Regarding the umbrella claims, Mr. Spray advised against focusing on a single quarter due to the line's inherent volatility and confirmed the company sees no concerning trends in its personal lines umbrella book.

Michael Phillips asked about the drivers behind the increase in the commercial casualty current accident year loss pick, questioning if it was due to paid activity versus IBNR, and also inquired about the strong premium growth in the segment.

Answer

EVP and CFO Mike Sewell explained that the higher loss pick is a result of prudent reserving amid industry uncertainty and some higher case incurred losses driven by severity, not frequency. He confirmed additions to IBNR. President and CEO Steve Spray added that strong pricing is supported by uncertainty around social inflation and that the company's sophisticated pricing tools provide a runway for more rate.

Michael Phillips from Oppenheimer asked if there were any changes in assumptions within the construction liability segment that impacted the current year loss pick. He also inquired about the excess casualty segment, specifically regarding growth opportunities and observed loss trends.

Answer

Michael Kehoe, CEO and Chairman, stated there were no specific changes in construction liability assumptions, noting that quarterly loss reserve reviews are complex across many lines and accident years. He affirmed confidence in the quarter's loss performance. Stuart Winston, EVP and Chief Underwriting Officer, addressed excess casualty, indicating good opportunities and strong rates, particularly in lead or first $10 million placements, despite some market pressure at higher excess attachment points where Kinsale typically does not operate.

Michael Phillips requested more detail on the 'mixed but positive' casualty pricing, particularly for the excess casualty book, and asked about loss trends and geographic factors in the construction business.

Answer

President & COO Brian Haney clarified that in casualty, longer-tail lines like construction and excess casualty are seeing higher rate increases, while other lines like products liability are on the lower end. For construction, he identified California as a past area of high loss development that prompted adjustments, noting the company has since pivoted its geographic focus and is growing outside that state.

Inquired about the drivers for more conservative actuarial assumptions in construction liability, potential changes to upcoming casualty treaty renewals, and asked for the commercial property combined ratio.

Answer

The conservative reserving for construction is a reaction to observed adverse loss development in prior years, not a proactive stance on tariffs. Management indicated they might increase their net retention on casualty treaties, consistent with past practice as the company grows. They declined to provide the specific combined ratio for the commercial property division.

Michael Phillips inquired about current loss trends in Kinsale's General Liability (GL) and commercial umbrella/excess books. He also asked for a specific breakdown of the California wildfire loss.

Answer

CEO Michael Kehoe did not provide specific trend data but stated they likely align with the industry. President and COO Brian Haney emphasized that margins in the GL and umbrella books are 'really strong' and that Kinsale's reserve development has been consistently better than the industry's. Regarding the wildfire, Michael Kehoe clarified the loss was '100% Palisades.'

Michael Phillips asked about the impact of raised attachment points in the personal umbrella book on margins, particularly in California and Florida, and the status of implementation in Florida. He also inquired about the significant 17% rate increase in personal umbrella this quarter compared to 9% last quarter, and sought clarification on standard markets pulling back in the Northeast regarding auto exposure.

Answer

Jen Klobnak, Chief Operating Officer, explained that higher attachment points (e.g., $500,000 from $250,000) were implemented in California over a year ago, Florida early this year, and seven additional larger states in September. She noted improving loss trends due to these changes and better underlying claims staff. The substantial 17% rate increase was attributed to specific state filings coming online, with Florida's significant rate change being effective this quarter. Regarding auto exposure, Klobnak clarified that standard markets pulling back in the Northeast referred to those covering artisan contractors, creating opportunities for RLI's ENS Casualty group on the excess side.

Michael Phillips from Oppenheimer inquired about the impact of RLI's increased attachment points in the personal umbrella book on margins, specifically in California and Florida, and the current status of these changes. He also asked about the drivers behind the significant 17% rate increase in personal umbrella this quarter compared to previous periods, and sought clarification on standard markets pulling back in the Northeast regarding casualty auto exposure.

Answer

Jen Klobnak, Chief Operating Officer, explained that higher attachment points (e.g., $500,000) were implemented over a year ago in California and recently in Florida and seven other large states, noting early signs of improving loss trends. She clarified that the 17% rate increase was influenced by substantial state-specific filings, particularly Florida's, becoming effective this quarter. Regarding auto exposure, Ms. Klobnak stated that some Northeast markets covering artisan contractors have pulled back, creating opportunities for RLI's ENS Casualty group on the excess side.

Michael Phillips of Oppenheimer asked for an update on the personal umbrella auto book, focusing on loss frequency and severity trends, and questioned if RLI has completed its non-renewal actions for large transportation accounts.

Answer

COO Jenni Klobnak confirmed that increased severity in personal umbrella has persisted for years and is being addressed via rate increases, higher attachment points, and slowing growth in problematic areas. CEO Craig Kliethermes added that slowing new business growth could improve the book's loss ratio over time. CFO Todd Bryant noted the Casualty segment's underlying loss ratio increased 1.5 points, mainly due to auto, reflecting a cautious reserving stance. Regarding transportation, Ms. Klobnak stated the evaluation of accounts is a continuous process and 'the job is never done'.

Michael Phillips inquired about the specifics of the current accident year casualty reserve additions, asking for a breakdown between transportation and personal umbrella, the severity trends in those lines, and the size of the large transportation accounts being non-renewed. He also asked about the long-term strategic view of the Prime investment and its potential exposure to California wildfires.

Answer

CFO Todd Bryant clarified that the casualty reserve additions were split evenly between personal umbrella and transportation, with an assumed loss trend of 10-11% for auto-related exposures. COO Jen Klobnak noted that while she couldn't provide a specific percentage, the non-renewed large transportation accounts represent a larger portion of premium than policy count. President and CEO Craig Kliethermes explained that RLI is a minority owner in Prime, viewing it as a good long-term investment, but has reduced its quota share participation. He also stated Prime's California homeowners business is not part of RLI's treaty.

Michael Phillips sought clarification on the extended reporting patterns in the Casualty segment, asking if they relate to older or recent accident years, and inquired about current severity trends in the commercial excess book compared to previous years.

Answer

CFO Todd Bryant explained that the extended reporting patterns affect both older and more recent accident years, particularly in excess liability where claim finality is slower. President and CEO Craig Kliethermes added that while reporting patterns may not be longer, the time to final resolution is extending. COO Jen Klobnak noted that for their construction-focused excess liability book, they have not seen significant changes in trend, with more pressure observed in auto-related lines.

Michael Phillips of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. asked about the potential benefits for Homeowners Choice from its independence from Exeo, the current pricing environment in the condo business, and sought confirmation on reserve adjustments since Q4.

Answer

Paresh Patel, Chairman & CEO, explained that separating from Exeo allows the insurance business to focus on pure-play opportunities in the volatile P&C market. He also confirmed that the commercial residential (condo) market remains soft, which was anticipated and is not a significant issue for HCI. CFO Mark Harmsworth confirmed there have been no reserve adjustments since the favorable one in Q4.

Michael Phillips of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. asked about the strategic alternatives considered for the Exzeo separation, whether the platform's advantages differ for admitted versus non-admitted carriers, recent rate movements in the Florida property market, and the competitive dynamics driving premium trends in the commercial condo business.

Answer

Chairman and CEO Paresh Patel stated that a spin-off was chosen over an IPO because Exzeo does not need to raise capital, and this structure maximizes tax-free value for shareholders. He also confirmed the platform's benefits are equivalent for both admitted and E&S carriers. Regarding the market, Patel noted no significant recent rate changes. CFO Mark Harmsworth clarified that commercial written premiums were not down, as the year-over-year comparison was skewed by the accounting for a large policy assumption in the prior year's first quarter.

Michael Phillips inquired about the drivers behind the favorable prior-period loss development, the size of the total addressable market (TAM) for the Axio technology platform, and sought clarification on the normalized combined ratio outlook for 2025.

Answer

CFO Mark Harmsworth attributed the favorable development to better-than-expected underlying trends, including lower lawsuit frequency and severity, rather than prior catastrophes. CEO Paresh Patel defined the TAM for the Axio platform as the entire $140 billion U.S. homeowners insurance market, where HCI currently has a small share. Mark Harmsworth then clarified that the 2025 combined ratio is expected to be in the mid-60s for the first half before normalizing to around 75% in the second half due to the timing of reinsurance and commission costs on new business.

Michael Phillips asked about the strategy behind not raising rates in Florida, its potential impact on margins, and the company's long-term growth strategy beyond the Citizens depopulation program, including potential expansion outside of Florida.

Answer

Executive Paresh Patel stated that the decision to hold rates steady is to provide stability for policyholders after a difficult storm season, prioritizing long-term relationships over short-term margin optimization. He positioned HCI's long-term strategy as leveraging its proven, climate-adaptive risk selection and underwriting model, which has demonstrated resilience in Florida and could be deployed for growth opportunities nationwide where the highest return on equity can be achieved.

Michael Phillips of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. inquired about the impact of new MGA programs on gross and net premium growth over the next 18 months, the non-cyclical growth drivers in the insurance segment beyond A&H, and the strategic differences between MGAs in London versus the U.S.

Answer

CEO Scott Egan explained that the company's strategy is to "lean into net" premium retention as MGA partnerships season and demonstrate performance, creating a growth tailwind. He identified A&H as a key "volatility shock absorber" and highlighted other specialty areas like surety and marine as growth opportunities, while being cautious on casualty. Regarding London, he noted that recent growth is the result of a strategic decision to reinvest in that market, leveraging their Lloyd's syndicate and company paper to attract new MGA partners. CFO Jim McKinney added that new partnerships provide a tailwind for both gross and net growth, though not in a linear fashion.

Michael Phillips of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. asked about the top-line impact of new MGA programs over the next 18 months, the non-cyclical growth drivers within the Insurance segment like A&H, and the key differences between London-based and U.S.-based MGAs.

Answer

CEO Scott Egan and CFO Jim McKinney explained that new MGA programs are seasoned before the company increases its net risk retention, creating a tailwind for both gross and net premium growth. Egan identified the Accident & Health (A&H) business as a key non-cyclical growth driver and a "volatility shock absorber" for the portfolio. He also noted that growth in London MGAs is a result of a strategic reinvestment in their London operations, leveraging their Lloyd's syndicate and company paper to attract new partners.

Michael Phillips of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. inquired about the top-line impact of new MGA programs over the next 18 months, the non-cyclical growth drivers in the Insurance segment beyond A&H, and the key differences between MGAs in London versus the U.S.

Answer

CEO Scott Egan explained that new programs provide a "tailwind" for growth, with the company increasing its net retention as it gains confidence in a partnership's performance over time. Egan identified A&H as a key "volatility shock absorber" and highlighted other specialty growth areas like surety and marine, while noting caution in casualty. He also described the growth in London as a result of a strategic decision to reinvest in the market and leverage the company's Lloyd's syndicate and own paper to attract MGA partners. CFO Jim McKinney added that strategic partnerships in North America are also expected to provide a stable tailwind for growth.

Michael Phillips asked about the impact of new MGA programs on premium growth, the non-cyclical growth drivers within the insurance segment like A&H, and the differences between London and US MGAs.

Answer

The company takes a cautious, program-by-program approach to new MGA business, increasing net retention as partnerships mature, which provides a tailwind for growth. A&H is a key non-cyclical growth driver and volatility dampener, allowing for selective risk-taking in other specialty areas while being cautious on casualty. The growth in London is a result of strategic investment and leveraging their own paper and group expertise to win new MGA business in that market.

Michael Phillips of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. inquired about the rate environment in the Specialty segment, the recent commercial auto reserve charge, and trends in personal auto bodily injury severity.

Answer

President & CEO John Roche and EVP & President - Specialty Bryan Salvatore explained that the Specialty portfolio's diversification and focus on lower middle market and small business provide resilience against pricing volatility. EVP & CFO Jeffrey Farber clarified the commercial auto charge was a minor, prudent IBNR adjustment in a small business line and that commentary on bodily injury severity was driven by prudence amid favorable frequency trends.

Michael Phillips asked for confirmation on the competitive pricing environment in small commercial, sought clarity on whether accelerating liability pricing expectations were for umbrella only or all casualty lines, and inquired about the rationale for recent commercial auto reserve additions.

Answer

President and CEO John "Jack" C. Roche and COO Richard Lavey confirmed they were adjusting new business pricing in small commercial to regain growth momentum after being slow to react to increased competition. CFO Jeffrey Farber clarified that the expectation for firming prices applies to all casualty lines, not just umbrella. Farber also explained that the commercial auto reserve additions for recent accident years were minor, prudent adjustments based on a few individual cases and not indicative of a broader trend.

Michael Phillips asked if recent reserving actions change the outlook for the Core Commercial loss ratio and requested more quantitative details on the commercial umbrella book.

Answer

CFO Jeff Farber confirmed the expectation for Core Commercial loss ratio improvement in 2025, driven by property. President of Agency Markets, Dick Lavey, provided specifics on the commercial umbrella book, noting it constitutes about 7% of the overall commercial portfolio, the company no longer writes it on a monoline basis, and it is achieving rate increases of 14%, with plans to push that higher.

Michael Phillips of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. asked for details on the drivers of potential Core Commercial loss ratio improvement in 2025, the reasons for the premium decline in Commercial Multi-Peril (CMP), and the company's outlook on share repurchases.

Answer

CFO Jeffrey Farber and President and CEO John "Jack" C. Roche explained that while property pricing needs are slowing, liability pricing is increasing, and their strong position on insurance-to-value provides a competitive advantage. President of Agency Markets Richard "Dick" Lavey confirmed the CMP premium trend was due to underwriting actions in the middle market and expects a return to mid-single-digit growth. Regarding capital, Farber stated the company is "likely to be back to capital management sooner rather than later" after the conclusion of the wind season.

Michael Phillips of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. requested a breakdown of the 20-point combined ratio deterioration, the impact of foreign exchange, and the drivers of the current accident year loss ratio. He also asked about the outlook for the reinsurance and aviation markets.

Answer

President and CEO Waleed Jabsheh explained that foreign exchange movements accounted for a significant portion of the combined ratio change, with the true underlying deterioration being closer to 6-7 points when comparing Q1 2025 to Q1 2024 on a like-for-like basis. He attributed the higher current accident year loss ratio to catastrophe events and large risk losses in the reinsurance and short-tail segments. He added that while the reinsurance market is softening, rates remain adequate for selective growth, and IGI's disciplined aviation book is performing well despite broader market challenges.

Michael Phillips asked about IGI's strategy for balancing top-line growth with its strong underwriting margins, the impact of California wildfires on its business appetite, and its view on using MGAs in a competitive market.

Answer

President and CEO Waleed Jabsheh emphasized that IGI prioritizes bottom-line profitability over aggressive growth, stating he would prefer an 80% combined ratio on a $700 million book over a 90% ratio on a $1 billion book. He noted that if market dislocation from events like the California wildfires leads to better pricing, IGI would aggressively pursue those opportunities. Regarding MGAs, Jabsheh explained that IGI only partners with them when they are accretive and offer differentiation in geography or business dynamics, a strategy that remains consistent regardless of market conditions.

Michael Phillips asked how Progressive balances maintaining rate stability for customers against reacting quickly to tariffs, questioning if the company would let margins absorb the impact to fuel growth. He also inquired about the shift from 12-month to 6-month policies in the agency channel.

Answer

CEO Susan Griffith described it as a constant balancing act, where decisions are made at a state and product level to optimize growth, profitability, and stability. She clarified that the shift to 6-month policies in the agency channel is an intentional move for platinum agents to provide convenience when bundling auto with 12-month property policies.

Michael Phillips questioned the drivers behind bodily injury (BI) liability trends and requested an update on policy reductions in catastrophe-exposed homeowners states.

Answer

CEO Susan Griffith attributed higher BI severity to large losses and attorney-represented claims, linking it to social inflation. On homeowners, she outlined a comprehensive de-risking plan including rate hikes, improved segmentation, exiting certain coverages, and mandatory wind/hail deductibles.

Michael Phillips of Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. questioned the reason for the significant improvement in the commercial auto accident year loss pick, given management's recent cautionary tone. He also asked about the source of volatility in the strategic investments line.

Answer

CEO Andrew Robinson explained the improved commercial auto loss pick was due to a better business mix, significant rate increases, and most critically, a dramatic reduction in claims frequency, which he noted was down over 50% for the 2024 accident year versus five years prior. He also confirmed that volatility in the investment line is driven by the alternative investments, specifically the Arena-managed opportunistic fixed income portfolio.

Michael Phillips sought to clarify the timeline for returning to growth in the Industry Solutions segment, the extent of cuts in Commercial Auto, and whether the 'extra emergence' in liability reserves mentioned previously had continued.

Answer

CEO Andrew Robinson projected about two more quarters of adjustments in Commercial Auto, with exposure reduction continuing through Q1 2025. He specified that inflation concerns are primarily driven by bodily injury in auto. Regarding reserves, he clarified that the emergence seen last quarter did not repeat, and while some buffers have eroded, the overall reserve position remains conservative and has not turned negative.

Michael Phillips from Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. inquired about casualty loss trends, particularly for General Liability and Commercial Auto, and whether the company is facing pricing pushback from agents or clients amid the current macroeconomic environment.

Answer

CEO John J. Marchioni confirmed that the 8.5% casualty loss trend view is unchanged, with GL severity driving a 9% trend. He explained the improvement in Commercial Auto's loss pick is due to multi-year rate increases outpacing trends and better performance in the physical damage component. He added that while there is some "rate fatigue," there has been no significant recent pushback on pricing.

Michael Phillips inquired about casualty loss trends, particularly for General Liability (GL), and the drivers behind the lower loss pick in commercial auto. He also asked about potential pricing pushback from agents and clients due to the macroeconomic environment.

Answer

CEO John J. Marchioni stated that the company's view on casualty loss trends remains unchanged, with GL trends around 9%, applied to a higher 2024 loss ratio base. He attributed the commercial auto improvement to multiple years of strong rate increases outpacing elevated loss trends, especially in auto physical damage. Marchioni noted that while there is some rate fatigue, there has not been significant pushback on pricing, as the company communicates that litigation abuse is the root cause of rising costs.

Michael Phillips asked about Selective's reserving methods, the 2025 casualty loss trend assumption, and the breakdown of the General Liability (GL) reserve charge between primary and excess lines.

Answer

John J. Marchioni, Chairman, President & CEO, clarified that Selective's reserving process has grown more detailed over time and consistently includes a risk margin above the actuarial best estimate. He explained the 8.5% casualty trend is an all-in figure, while the previously mentioned 9% trend is specific to GL. Marchioni confirmed the reserve charge was predominantly in primary GL, especially for the 2023 accident year.

Michael Phillips asked for clarification on commercial auto reserve additions and sought reassurance on the company's comfort level with these reserves, questioning if the social inflation seen in General Liability (GL) could spread more significantly to commercial auto.

Answer

John J. Marchioni, Chairman, President & CEO, explained that commercial auto loss trends, while elevated, have been more stable and persistent for a longer period than the more recent severity emergence in GL. He highlighted that strong, consistent pricing in commercial auto (10.9% in Q3) differentiates it from GL. Anthony David Harnett, SVP & Chief Accounting Officer, clarified that the current year reserve action for commercial auto was $5 million, not $10 million.

Michael Phillips asked for clarification on commercial auto reserve additions and sought assurance on the potential for social inflation impacts to spread from General Liability (GL) to commercial auto, questioning if Selective's experience is a microcosm or an industry-wide trend.

Answer

CEO John J. Marchioni explained that commercial auto loss trends have persisted for longer and have been met with stronger, more consistent pricing compared to the more recent severity emergence in GL. He expressed confidence that social inflation is an industry-wide trend, citing external factors and broad industry data. SVP & Chief Accounting Officer Tony Harnett clarified the current accident year commercial auto reserve action was $5 million.

Michael Phillips of Morgan Stanley inquired about Selective's commercial renewal pricing, questioning if its upward trend differs from competitors and seeking assurance on the company's ability to maintain this trajectory without harming retention. He also asked for perspective on whether the general liability reserve issues are specific to Selective or indicative of a broader industry problem.

Answer

John J. Marchioni, Chairman, President & CEO, responded that while Selective may be an early mover on pricing, he expects the industry to follow due to recognized loss trends. He affirmed the company's conviction to achieve necessary pricing, even if it impacts retention. Marchioni asserted that the severity trends are a widespread industry phenomenon, not a Selective-specific issue, noting that Selective's portfolio avoids some of the most litigious states that drive nuclear verdicts.

Michael Phillips asked for a breakdown of Commercial Auto growth between rate and policy count and inquired about the competitive environment in Personal Auto.

Answer

Greg Toczydlowski, President of Business Insurance, stated that Commercial Auto's top-line growth is primarily driven by renewal premium change (rate and exposure). Michael Klein, President of Personal Insurance, described the competitive landscape in Personal Auto as 'fairly consistent,' noting that Travelers' new business was up 6% year-over-year and hit a fourth-quarter record.

Michael Phillips asked if accelerating BI casualty rates, despite strong margins, imply a heightened concern over uncertainties compared to a year ago. He also requested an update on loss trends in management liability.

Answer

Chairman and CEO Alan Schnitzer stated that concern levels haven't necessarily increased, but pricing needs to keep up with positive loss trends. Jeff Klenk, President of Bond & Specialty, gave no specific loss trend update for management liability but noted that while earned pricing impacted the combined ratio, returns remain excellent.