Question · Q4 2025
Paulina Rojas-Schmidt inquired about Brixmor's dispositions of assets with low occupancy, such as Westchester Square and Springdale, asking if these centers shared commonalities that made a sale more compelling than driving additional occupancy internally, especially given strong leasing momentum.
Answer
CEO Brian Finnegan explained that while some disposed assets had vacancy, the decision was driven by ROI. If accretive capital deployment wasn't feasible, Brixmor compared hold versus sale decisions, opting to recycle capital into higher-return opportunities. He noted strong bids for assets and that the occupancy impact from dispositions was minimal, with the primary motivators being a lack of ROI and the investment required, particularly in markets where Brixmor had a limited presence.
Ask follow-up questions
Fintool can predict
BRX's earnings beat/miss a week before the call