Puneet Jain

Puneet Jain asked about the implications of recent agentic AI evolution for IT services spending, inquiring if clients show increased urgency to adopt agentic AI, and whether this AI spending represents incremental budgets or a reallocation from other discretionary areas.

Answer

CEO Martín Migoya confirmed that companies are moving to action with agentic AI to accelerate technical debt reduction, replace shallow SaaS, automate processes, and improve customer experience. He emphasized that AI-native services, delivered via AI Pods, provide scalable, faster, and enterprise-class solutions, driving momentum. He believes AI spending is expansionary, leading to 100x more software creation, not just reallocation, as technical debt and consumer experience debt demand significant new investment.

Puneet Jain asked about the implications of agentic AI evolution for IT services spending, specifically if clients are showing increased urgency to adopt it. He also inquired whether current AI spending represents incremental investment or a reallocation from other discretionary budgets.

Answer

CEO Martín Migoya stated that companies are actively moving into AI execution, focusing on accelerating technical debt reduction, replacing less robust SaaS solutions, automating processes, and improving customer experience. He emphasized that AI Pods are crucial for achieving real productivity and savings, distinguishing them from merely providing AI tools. Migoya asserted that AI spending is expansionary, predicting a 100x increase in software creation, driven by the need to address significant technical debt and declining customer experience, which will lead to more demand for AI-native services.

Puneet Jain inquired about the ramp-up timeline for new clients in the Middle East and the current pricing trends Globant is experiencing.

Answer

CEO Martín Migoya stated that the ramp-up for Middle East clients is underway, with strong growth expected in 2025 and even stronger growth in 2026. CFO Juan Urthiague added that the company is expanding its industry footprint in the region beyond amusement parks into hospitality, finance, and airlines. Regarding pricing, Urthiague described the market as challenging, anticipating neutral to low single-digit price increases for the year, particularly as competition is higher for cost-saving projects.

Puneet Jain from JPMorgan Chase & Co. asked about TaskUs's 2026 guidance implying flat to modest growth by year-end, inquiring about the extent of existing business exposure to AI-related automation beyond the largest client and the expected timeline for such impacts. He also asked if recent AI news (e.g., Anthropic) has increased client urgency or changed behavior regarding AI solution adoption speed.

Answer

Bryce Maddock, Co-founder and CEO of TaskUs, stated the intention to drive year-over-year revenue growth each quarter. He acknowledged AI-related exposure but noted that many clients are reinvesting automation savings into premium human interactions. Maddock emphasized that most large CX clients saw revenue growth in 2025 and expect it in 2026, benefiting from growth in industries perceived as AI targets. He added that recent AI news has increased excitement, leading to more pilots and production versions of AI agents, but clients are still in a discovery phase for end-to-end autonomous agents due to security and legal concerns.

Puneet Jain asked about the implications of TaskUs's 2026 guidance for flat to modest positive growth by year-end, specifically regarding the exposure of the existing book of business to AI-related automation similar to the largest client, and the expected timeline for such automation. He also inquired if recent news flow around AI and agentic AI has created a new sense of urgency or changed client behavior regarding the speed of adopting AI solutions.

Answer

Bryce Maddock, Co-Founder and CEO, stated TaskUs's intention to drive year-over-year revenue growth every quarter. He acknowledged AI-related exposure but noted that clients often reinvest savings from automating simple tasks into premium human interactions. Most large CX clients saw revenue growth in 2025 and expect it in 2026. Maddock confirmed increased client excitement around AI, leading to pilots and production of AI agents. However, he noted that deploying end-to-end autonomous agents in enterprise environments faces security and legal concerns, suggesting a slower adoption pace, though it remains on clients' medium-term roadmaps.

Puneet Jain inquired about the primary factors that drove the significant increase in full-year revenue guidance since the beginning of 2024. He also asked if there was any election-related benefit in the Trust & Safety segment during Q3 or Q4.

Answer

CEO Bryce Maddock attributed the guidance raise to a shift in client focus from cost-cutting to growth investments, particularly in generative AI. Key drivers include expanded work with their largest client in Trust & Safety, growth in the Financial Crime and Compliance (FCC) offering, and a rebound in AI Services. Maddock clarified that while TaskUs does election-related work, the end of the U.S. election is not expected to impact revenue, as growth is driven by broader global regulatory pressures.

Puneet Jain asked about the drivers behind accelerated client decision-making for AI initiatives, specifically if recent news flow around agentic solutions like Anthropic is a factor, or other reasons.

Answer

Rohit Kapoor (Chairman and CEO, EXL) attributed the accelerated decision-making in Q4 2025 and Q1 2026 to a greater client propensity for AI adoption, a shift from cost takeout to growth-focused AI applications, and EXL's strategic engagement capabilities. He noted a transition from 2025's proof-of-concept phase to scaled enterprise AI adoption.

Puneet Jain asked about the accelerated decision-making among clients regarding AI adoption, specifically whether recent news flow around Anthropic and agentic solutions is driving this urgency, or if there are other contributing factors. He also inquired about the revenue impact when traditional operations management clients implement AI with EXL, considering efficiency gains and potential incremental work.

Answer

Rohit Kapoor, Chairman and CEO of EXL, explained that accelerated decision-making in Q4 2025 and Q1 2026 reflects a greater client propensity for enterprise-scale AI adoption, shifting focus from cost takeout to growth. He highlighted that EXL's position as a trusted AI-enabled operator, combined with its domain expertise and ability to deliver tangible business outcomes, leads to clients outsourcing more complex processes and expanding engagements, driving overall operations revenue growth.

Puneet Jain asked if clients prefer existing vendors for AI implementation or if they are switching to new providers, and whether current growth trends across segments will continue.

Answer

Chairman & CEO Rohit Kapoor stated that clients are seeking maximum value, and EXL's unique combination of domain, data, and AI expertise provides a distinct advantage that attracts both new and existing clients. He confirmed the expectation that the Data & AI business will continue its strong growth trajectory in the second half, outpacing the Digital Operations business, as the company continues its strategic pivot.

Puneet Jain asked about the potential impact of an incremental macroeconomic headwind on discretionary spending areas. He also inquired about the expected cadence of revenue growth and margins throughout 2025, both on a year-over-year and sequential basis.

Answer

Rohit Kapoor, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, emphasized the resilience of EXL's diversified, annuity-based business model, which focuses on mission-critical operations and delivering high ROI, making it robust even in economic slowdowns. Maurizio Nicolelli, Chief Financial Officer, detailed the financial cadence, expecting a stronger first half due to weaker 2024 comps and noting that margins would see higher investment levels in Q2-Q4 to fuel AI capabilities, with sequential growth patterns likely mirroring the previous year.

Puneet Jain questioned why clients need EXL to implement AI agents rather than handling it themselves and asked about the competitive landscape for these deployments. He also inquired about the new financial model and how EXL will ensure visibility and accountability for its stand-alone analytics services going forward.

Answer

Rohit Kapoor, Chairman and CEO, explained that EXL's key differentiator is its ability to embed AI agents directly into client workflows and connect them to data assets, which significantly increases adoption and is a complex task for clients to manage internally. Regarding the new model, he stated that analytics is now a mature, integrated capability, and the company will provide transparency by reporting overall 'data and AI' revenue, which stood at 53% of total revenue in 2024.

Puneet Jain asked about the proportion of the Analytics segment's revenue that comes from newer services like data management and AI models, and inquired about the data sources and client permissions for training proprietary LLMs like the insurance LLM.

Answer

CEO Rohit Kapoor explained that the Analytics business is rapidly evolving towards complex AI and data management services, driven by partnerships with Databricks and hyperscalers, though he did not quantify the mix of new versus old services. He confirmed that EXL uses client data for LLM training only with explicit contractual permission. This data, often derivative and anonymized, allows EXL to leverage its unique position and domain expertise to continuously fine-tune models and enhance their accuracy.

Puneet Jain inquired about the drivers behind Endava's fiscal year 2026 guidance, specifically the implied sequential growth in Q4 after a flattish Q3 on an FX-neutral basis, and sought details on the scope of work for extended commitments with two major payments clients, asking if continued sequential growth is expected beyond the current fiscal year.

Answer

CFO Mark Thurston clarified that Q3's flattish appearance is due to FX headwinds and fewer working days, with an underlying sequential growth of about 4%. He explained that Q4's stronger sequential growth (around 6% underlying) is underpinned by secured deals and an increase in working days. Regarding the payments clients, Mr. Thurston stated these were primarily extensions of existing work with some incremental additions in the switch/gateway space, focusing on cost rationalization and enhancing customer value propositions.

Puneet Jain from JPMorgan Chase & Co. inquired about the drivers behind the implied sequential growth in Q4 fiscal year 2026, particularly after a flattish Q3 on an FX-neutral basis, asking about deal ramps and billing days.

Answer

CFO Mark Thurston clarified that Q3's flattish appearance was due to FX headwinds and fewer working days, with an underlying sequential growth of about 4%. He explained that Q4 benefits from an increase in working days and is underpinned by secured deals, resulting in an underlying sequential growth of approximately 6%. Puneet Jain also asked for more details on the extended commitments with two largest payment clients, including scope of work and expectations for continued sequential growth beyond the current fiscal year. CFO Mark Thurston detailed that these were mostly extensions on existing run rates in the switch/gateway space, focused on cost rationalization and enhancing customer value propositions.

Puneet Jain followed up on the $100 million deal, asking for details on its duration, the type of work (new development vs. managed services), why this deal was different, and its replicability. He also inquired about the timing of revenue, specifically if this deal and two other large deals alone could drive the implied GBP 10 million incremental revenue per quarter in Q3 and Q4.

Answer

CEO John Cotterell described the $100 million deal as a very exciting, five-year commitment, almost entirely focused on new development, transformation, new product development, and joint go-to-market exploration. He noted it's a close partnership mindset, leveraging Endava's payments and AI experience, and is a 'headline' for other similar deals in progress. CFO Mark Thurston confirmed the implied GBP 10 million incremental revenue per quarter is roughly correct, with the landed large deals contributing about 50% of that ramp, and the balance coming from pipeline conversion on existing run-rate (non-strategic) business.

Puneet Jain requested more details on the $100 million payments deal, including its duration, type of work (new development vs. managed services), what made it unique, and its replicability. He also asked if the three large deals alone could drive the incremental revenue implied in the second-half guidance.

Answer

CEO John Cotterell described the $100 million deal as a five-year commitment, almost entirely new development focused on transformation and new product development, representing a close, replicable partnership. CFO Mark Thurston clarified that the three large deals contribute approximately 50% of the implied H2 revenue ramp, with the remainder coming from pipeline conversion in the existing run-rate business.

Puneet Jain from JPMorgan Chase & Co. asked about the assumptions for client budgets within the fiscal 2025 revenue guidance. He also requested an update on the GalaxE integration progress and the expected synergies from cross-selling opportunities.

Answer

CEO John Cotterell stated the guidance is not based on a significant change in client budgets but rather on expanded service capabilities from core modernization, the new India footprint, and cross-selling with GalaxE. He detailed that the GalaxE integration is going well, creating a powerful core modernization proposition that is generating a strong pipeline. CFO Mark Thurston added that the integration involves system migrations (heavy in Q2/Q3) and sharpening the go-to-market strategy.

Puneet Jain inquired about the primary decision-makers within client organizations for Genpact's agentic solutions, such as AP operations, asking whether business managers or the CIO office are driving the adoption of agentic AI.

Answer

CEO Balkrishan Kalra explained that it's always a combination of both. While business managers traditionally have a stronger voice for mission-critical operations, the CIO or CDIO office becomes an integral part of the equation when weaving agents into complex system roadmaps. Genpact is increasingly invited to dialogues where CIOs and CDIOs evaluate their framework for agentic operations, combining agents with human expertise under responsible AI governance. Regarding large deals, Mr. Kalra noted that while talent transfer remains an integral part of their model, the current increase is driven by clients recognizing the benefits of agentic operations in mission-critical areas like finance and supply chain, leading to more demand and invitations to manage Global Capability Centers (GCCs).

Puneet Jain asked about the decision-makers within client organizations for agentic solutions like AP Suite and Agentic Operations, specifically whether it's business managers or the CIO office driving the adoption of agentic AI.

Answer

Balkrishan Kalra, CEO of Genpact, stated that it is always a combination of both. While the business voice is larger for running mission-critical operations, the CIO or CDIO is an integral part of the equation for weaving agents into complex system roadmaps. He noted that Genpact is increasingly invited to dialogues when CIOs/CDIOs consider their framework for agentic operations, which combines agents with human expertise under responsible AI governance. Puneet Jain then inquired about the drivers behind the increase in large deals closed this year, specifically if they typically involve rebadging components (talent transfer from in-house operations) and if they are AI-led deals. Balkrishan Kalra explained that talent transfer has always been an integral part of their model and nothing special has changed there. He highlighted that clients are increasingly recognizing the benefits of agentic operations in mission-critical areas like finance, supply chain, mid-offices, claims, underwriting, and banking, which is opening up demand and leading to invitations for even Global Capability Center (GCC) conversations.

Puneet Jain of JPMorgan Chase & Co. asked about which verticals or regions are seeing higher AI adoption and whether clients prefer existing or new vendors for AI initiatives. He also questioned the pricing environment and the impact of AI on it.

Answer

CEO Balkrishan Kalra stated that AI adoption is broad-based across sectors, with the US, Australia, and Europe leading geographically. He noted strong demand from both new and existing clients, who value Genpact's last-mile expertise. On pricing, Kalra asserted there is no irrational behavior, as clients are focused on value. CFO Mike Weiner added that the shift from FTE to outcome-based models is accelerating, which is a healthy trend.

Puneet Jain questioned why delayed pipeline deals would significantly impact Q2 guidance, asking if there was underlying weakness in existing business. He also asked what level of AI-driven productivity savings Genpact promises in its large, multiyear deal proposals.

Answer

CFO Mike Weiner asserted there is no weakness in the existing book of business and that the Q2 guidance reflects a prudent, conservative view of the macro environment. He noted that over 75% of the full-year growth target is expected to be delivered in the first half. CEO BK Kalra explained that large 5-7 year deals typically bake in 30-45% productivity gains over the contract term, which are shared with clients through holistic solutions incorporating GenAI and other technologies.

Puneet Jain of JPMorgan Chase & Co. sought clarification on whether Broadridge's super validator status on the Canton Network was linked to its digital asset repo platform and if being paid in coins for this platform was common. He also asked about the expected returns on Broadridge's investment in the Canton Network. Additionally, he requested a breakdown of the percentages driving the one-point increase in recurring revenue guidance, specifically the acquisition contribution and the headwind from lower interest rates.

Answer

CEO Tim Gokey clarified that the super validator role is separate from the distributed ledger repo platform, though related, and that being paid in coin for such a role is common, governed by the Canton Network's documentation. He noted that the investment to become a super validator was relatively low. CFO Ashima Ghei reiterated that the biggest driver of the revenue guidance upside was the less than 50 basis points contribution from the iJoin and Signal acquisitions, which more than offset the impact of additional expected Fed rate cuts. She added that the guidance also reflects growing confidence in underlying growth from strong position growth, sales revenue, and digital asset revenue.

Puneet Jain sought clarification on Broadridge's super validator status on the Canton Network, asking if it's common to be paid in coins for the digital asset repo platform and how Broadridge expects to generate returns from its Canton Network investments. He also requested a breakdown of the percentage contributions from acquisitions and the impact of lower interest rates on the increased recurring revenue growth guidance.

Answer

CEO Tim Gokey clarified that the super validator role is separate from the Distributed Ledger Repo platform, though related. He confirmed that being paid in coin is common for the super validator role, governed by the Canton Network's economic structure, and noted that the investment to become a super validator was relatively low. CFO Ashima Ghei explained that the guidance increase for recurring revenue is primarily driven by less than 50 basis points from iJoin and Signal acquisitions, partially offset by additional expected rate cuts (two more in the fiscal year). She added that the increased confidence also stems from strong underlying growth, including position growth, sales backlog conversion, and digital asset revenue.

Puneet Jain of JPMorgan Chase & Co. questioned if the increasing mix of digital solutions was changing the duration of the revenue backlog and asked for confirmation on the fiscal 2026 margin guidance, specifically the implied 50 basis point headwind from distribution and float income.

Answer

CFO Ashima Ghei stated that while there are different conversion times for ICS versus GTO products, with recent wealth sales taking longer to convert, there isn't a broad change in overall backlog duration. She confirmed that the flat reported margin guidance of 20-21% includes headwinds from higher postage rates and lower float income, and that the underlying core margin expansion is expected to be over 50 basis points, enabling the 8-12% adjusted EPS growth.

Puneet Jain asked about the potential impact of a new administration's policies, such as deregulation, and questioned whether the delayed sales were for long or short implementation cycle deals.

Answer

CEO Timothy Gokey expressed confidence that Broadridge is well-positioned regardless of the regulatory environment, seeing opportunities to provide technology solutions for digital assets, shareholder engagement, and digital delivery. Regarding delayed sales, Gokey hypothesized that longer, more complex deals are likely more affected by uncertainty. CFO Ashima Ghei contextualized the impact, noting the guidance change is modest and, given the 12-24 month conversion cycles, the near-term revenue impact is fractional and represents a delay, not a loss of business.

Puneet Jain asked if Broadridge has observed any changes in client behavior within its GTO segment due to potential deregulation and inquired about capital allocation plans for the next fiscal year, particularly the balance between M&A and internal investments.

Answer

CEO Tim Gokey stated that it is too early to see significant client behavior changes from deregulation but noted relief among clients regarding the potential halt of new capital rules. He reiterated Broadridge's disciplined capital allocation framework: prioritizing internal investments and the dividend, then using remaining free cash flow for either high-return M&A or share repurchases. He added that the company will only pursue compelling M&A and is comfortable buying back shares otherwise.

Puneet Jain asked if Broadridge is observing changes in client behavior regarding project execution and deal flow, and also requested more detail on the company's confidence in the forecast for stock record growth to improve from the 3% reported in Q1.

Answer

CEO Tim Gokey stated that Broadridge did not see the project execution slowdown that others reported and noted that sales-to-revenue conversion is improving. He highlighted a strong sales start and a robust pipeline. Interim CFO Ashima Ghei explained that Q1's 3% stock record growth was expected due to seasonality and company mix, and that forward testing reliably indicates a return to mid-to-high single-digit growth for the remainder of the fiscal year.

Puneet Jain inquired about the adoption rate of the CINT Flow platform among clients and internal teams, asking what portion of revenue is influenced by Flow-driven services. He also asked about the differing rates of AI adoption across verticals, particularly the strength in financial services versus retail.

Answer

CEO Cesar Gon stated that CINT Flow adoption has reached 90% of internal teams, meaning approximately 90% of revenue is influenced by AI-boosted processes. He explained that the financial services vertical is ahead in AI adoption due to high ROI and a trend in Brazil towards AI-driven customer experiences via WhatsApp. Gon noted that while retail is also adopting AI, it first requires foundational modernization of legacy systems, which itself drives demand for CINT's services.

Puneet Jain asked about the company's visibility into the second half of the year and any differing spending patterns between U.S. and Latin American clients. He also posed a structural question on why IT services firms are positioned to benefit from Gen AI compared to software or pure-play AI companies.

Answer

Founder & CEO Cesar Gon cited a strong pipeline and client expansion as support for the full-year guidance, seeing no significant difference in demand between the U.S. and Brazil. Founder & President Bruno Guicardi added that as AI improves productivity, the 'build vs. buy' dynamic will favor custom software development, creating a structural tailwind for IT services firms like CI&T who can deliver bespoke solutions more cheaply and effectively.

Puneet Jain asked about the impact of recent geopolitical and macroeconomic news on client spending, and whether CI&T is seeing any caution or pauses, particularly comparing the U.S. to other regions. He also inquired about the company's use of cash in 2025, noting a pause in M&A activity and asking about future plans for acquisitions versus other capital allocation priorities.

Answer

CEO Cesar Gon stated that demand from large organizations remains stable despite macro uncertainty, which favors CI&T's strategy of replacing competitors with its AI-driven solutions. He noted a stronger sales pipeline, up 30% year-over-year, and confirmed no incremental delays. Regarding cash use, Cesar Gon explained the focus in 2024 was on becoming an AI-first company to drive organic growth, but M&A may resume to expand in the U.S. CFO Stanley Rodrigues added that capital will also be allocated to R&D for the CI&T/FLOW platform, share buybacks, and paying down debt.

Puneet Jain from JPMorgan Chase & Co. asked if there were differences in AI adoption across industry verticals and if this was driving the strong performance in Financial Services. He also inquired about potential changes to the delivery model as more proprietary and third-party AI solutions are incorporated.

Answer

Balazs Fejes, President of Global Business & CRO, stated that AI adoption is broad-based across all verticals, with no significant differences between them, and CEO Arkadiy Dobkin confirmed there is no direct connection to vertical performance at this time. Fejes also noted that EPAM is continuously experimenting with new engagement models, including subscription-based offerings for its platforms, to adapt to client needs.

Puneet Jain asked about the billing day dynamics and visibility assumed in the second-half guidance.

Answer

CFO Jason Peterson clarified that the guidance assumes typical seasonal billing day patterns, with Q3 having more days than Q2, which should drive some sequential growth. He noted good visibility into Q2 and solid indications for Q3, with the guidance midpoint reflecting potential seasonal softness in Q4.

Puneet Jain of JPMorgan Chase & Co. asked for an update on employee productivity in newer regions like Latin America and India compared to Eastern Europe, especially with the Nedis acquisition. He also inquired about any significant client-specific headwinds to consider for 2025.

Answer

CEO Arkadiy Dobkin explained that it's early to assess Nedis fully, but initial assessments suggest their engineering level is comparable to EPAM's other centers. He noted that productivity metrics are complex and vary by market. Regarding 2025 headwinds, Dobkin acknowledged unpredictability due to geopolitical and other external factors, stating the company is cautiously optimistic but aware that the environment can change quickly, similar to how past predictions have been challenged.

Puneet Jain from JPMorgan Chase & Co. inquired about the competitive landscape in the digital customer care segment and asked about the varying rates of AI adoption across different industry verticals like tech, financial services, and healthcare.

Answer

Acting CEO Jason Macdonnell stated that competitive intensity, rather than the number of competitors, is the main pressure in customer care, with differentiation coming from embedding technology and thought leadership. President of Digital Solutions Tobias Dengel explained that AI adoption for external use cases varies by industry due to regulation, with gaming moving faster than financial services. However, for internal efficiency use cases, adoption is consistently strong across all verticals.

Puneet Jain asked about the operational model and contract economics when TELUS Digital's solutions team collaborates with the core TELUS entity to develop and deploy AI-based customer care solutions.

Answer

Executive Jason Macdonnell detailed a multi-stage process beginning with a consultative audit, followed by development services which may involve capital investment from TELUS, and evolving into recurring support and outcome-based pricing. Executive Tobias Dengel added that the TELUS partnership serves as a 'laboratory' to test and refine managed services models. He also confirmed that the economics are strong, with projects generating market-competitive or better margins through consulting, development, and project management fees.

Puneet Jain asked for examples of clients transitioning to AI automation, the resulting impact on revenue and margins, and the timing for the projected $50 million in cost savings for 2025.

Answer

Tobias Dengel, President of Digital Solutions, noted that AI is improving agent efficiency and handling simple queries, which elevates the end-customer experience. Jason Macdonnell, Acting CEO, clarified that it's early for major cost takeouts, as AI often frees up capacity for more complex work, and value-sharing from efficiency gains is negotiated case-by-case. Gopi Chande, CFO, stated that the $50 million in savings will be weighted to the second half of 2025, following investments in operations transformation made in the first half.

Puneet Jain of JPMorgan Chase & Co. asked how AI is changing the software development life cycle (SDLC) and what that implies for employee training and hiring. He also questioned whether the differing growth rates across verticals like financial services versus retail were due to varying AI adoption rates or macro-specific factors.

Answer

CTO Eugene Steinberg explained that the shift to an AI-first SDLC elevates the role of senior engineers to that of 'judges' for AI-generated work, a trend Grid Dynamics has been preparing for with specialized training in areas like 'context engineering'. CEO Leonard Livschitz clarified that strong AI adoption is happening across all verticals. The growth disparity is caused by muted spending on traditional, non-AI projects in certain verticals like retail due to macro pressures, which offsets the gains from new AI initiatives in those sectors.

Puneet Jain inquired about changes in client behavior, particularly in the retail and TMT verticals like Apple, the strategic growth of the India delivery center, and the visibility driving the strong second-half revenue ramp guidance.

Answer

CEO Leonard Livschitz and SVP Americas Vasily Sizov addressed client behavior, noting their work with Apple is focused on less supply-chain-dependent online services, where no slowdown is expected. Livschitz detailed that the India expansion is a key strategic priority for scaling talent and supporting APAC growth, confirming it will become their largest location. CFO Anil Doradla explained the second-half guidance is supported by factors like more working days and the extrapolation of record billable headcount, providing a conservative path to the low end of the range.

Puneet Jain asked what is driving Grid Dynamics' strong 2025 guidance, which significantly outperforms its peers, and questioned if the growth would be broad-based across verticals and clients. He also inquired about the revenue contribution from AI initiatives.

Answer

CEO Leonard Livschitz attributed the outperformance to consistent business momentum, strong client relationships, technology adoption, and hyperscaler partnerships, noting broad-based demand from TMT, CPG, and fintech. SVP Americas Vasily Sizov added that AI is now a core component of most large engagements, shifting from proof-of-concepts to large-scale programs focused on revenue generation, a historical strength for the company.

Puneet Jain asked what is driving Grid Dynamics' growth outperformance versus peers, how clients allocate work between vendors and in-house GCCs, and whether AI spending is incremental or reallocated.

Answer

CEO Leonard Livschitz attributed the growth separation to their deep technology partnership model, where AI solutions lead to larger, strategic implementations. He explained that they win work with GCCs by offering specialized, project-based expertise, not just staffing. Regarding AI budgets, Livschitz stated the spending is both reallocated and incremental, as clients move from experimental POCs to mainstream application development, driving new revenue streams for Grid Dynamics.

Puneet Jain asked about the sensitivity to travel volumes given the macro environment, what the fiscal 2026 guidance assumes for the travel vertical, and how close contracts are to minimum commitment levels. He also requested details on the headwind from a utilities client, its nature, and the proportion of WNS revenue from platform-based services.

Answer

CEO Keshav Murugesh noted a counterintuitively strong pipeline in travel and logistics, as clients focus on cost leadership. Executive David Mackey clarified that the pressure has been in the OTA space, which is now down to 3% of revenue, and guidance assumes no improvement, viewing it as 'bumping along the bottom.' Regarding the utilities client, Mackey explained it was a one-time platform migration project that created a revenue bump in Q2/Q3 and then fell off, not an underlying headwind. CFO Arijit Sengupta confirmed the underlying volume work with the client remains stable.

Puneet Jain asked about the potential impact of Agentic AI on WNS and what the 'new normal' for operating margins should be, considering investments and the recent transition to U.S. GAAP reporting.

Answer

CEO Keshav Murugesh positioned Agentic AI as a long-term opportunity that WNS is investing in, expecting it to be a tailwind over the next three years. CFO Arijit Sengupta and Executive David Mackey stated the new normal for margins is the high 19% to 20% range. They clarified this already accounts for investments and that the primary change from historical levels is the ~120 basis point impact from the GAAP transition.

Puneet Jain asked about client behavior regarding AI and analytics adoption, whether the 5% revenue target from Gen AI was still on track, and requested a quantification of the year-over-year impact from key headwinds into fiscal 2026.

Answer

CEO Keshav Murugesh described a shift towards strategic, CEO-led conversations around AI-driven transformation, which applies to both new and existing clients. Executive David Mackey confirmed the 5% Gen AI revenue target is still achievable. For fiscal 2026, Mackey quantified the year-over-year drag from the healthcare client loss at approximately 1% and the OTA decline at 1.5-2%, creating a combined headwind of roughly 3% that will bleed into the next fiscal year.

Puneet Jain from JPMorgan Chase & Co. asked if WNS is seeing clients pause decisions to assess Gen AI's impact and whether the large deals being signed already incorporate Gen AI applications. He also questioned how the shift to U.S. GAAP reporting will affect operating margins.

Answer

CEO Keshav Murugesh responded that client focus has shifted from Gen AI hype back to core strategic goals like cost leadership and transformation, where WNS is seen as a key partner. He confirmed that new large deals are technology-led and infused with Gen AI capabilities. Executive David Mackey added that two of the four large deals signed in Q4 had Gen AI components. Regarding the GAAP change, executives explained it's a reclassification that lowers adjusted operating margin by about 100 basis points but is largely neutral to adjusted net income (ANI) and EPS. Mackey affirmed confidence in reaching 20%+ adjusted operating margins for the full year under the new standard.