Sign in

    Tejas Savant

    Research Analyst at Morgan Stanley

    Tejas Savant is an Executive Director and Senior Healthcare Equity Analyst at Morgan Stanley in New York, specializing in the coverage of leading genomics and diagnostics companies such as 10x Genomics, Tempus AI, Veracyte, Illumina, Avantor, Hologic, Grail Inc, Natera Inc, and Cytek Biosciences. He has issued over 230 ratings and currently holds a 44% success rate with an average return of approximately -1.8% per recommendation, reflecting a challenging sector environment but a commitment to comprehensive sector coverage. Savant's career progression includes promotion from Vice President to Executive Director at Morgan Stanley, accompanied by regular participation in corporate earnings calls for over 18 key companies. He is registered with relevant professional bodies such as FINRA and is licensed to offer securities research and investment analysis.

    Tejas Savant's questions to GRAIL (GRAL) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to GRAIL (GRAL) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    Tejas Savant asked for clarity on the cash burn trajectory for the remainder of the year toward the $320 million target. He also questioned if operating expenses might need to be reaccelerated to address upcoming competitor launches in the MCED space.

    Answer

    Executive Aaron Freidin clarified that Q1 cash burn was higher due to annual bonus payouts, a non-recurring event in subsequent quarters, and reiterated confidence in the full-year target of $320 million or less. An executive stated that while they are monitoring new market entrants, it is not yet clear if any OpEx changes will be necessary, highlighting GRAIL's significant investment in setting a high clinical bar.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to GRAIL (GRAL) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    An associate on behalf of Tejas Savant asked if the recent Quest Diagnostics collaboration and TRICARE coverage decision were already incorporated into the 2025 guidance or if they represent potential upside. He also followed up on the MCED legislation, asking for clarity on reimbursement timelines and the proposed rate benchmarked against multi-target stool screening tests.

    Answer

    CFO Aaron Freidin confirmed that both the Quest and TRICARE opportunities were contemplated when formulating the 2025 guidance, and therefore, the guidance remains unchanged. Executive Robert Ragusa clarified that the legislative timeline is a starting negotiation point. Mr. Freidin added that the potential reimbursement rate was a key consideration in developing the new, lower-cost Galleri test to ensure long-term profitability at scale.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to GRAIL (GRAL) leadership • Q3 2024

    Question

    Jason from Morgan Stanley inquired about GRAIL's strategy for building the MCED market over the next two years before potential reimbursement is established. He also asked for details on the next version of the Galleri test, specifically regarding any performance differences and the nature of the bridging studies required for the PMA submission.

    Answer

    Executive Robert Ragusa stated that the pre-reimbursement commercial efforts are key to building the ecosystem by familiarizing providers and health systems with the test and integrating it into their practices. This process helps prepare the entire system, including the laboratory, for the high volumes expected after reimbursement. Regarding the new Galleri version, Ragusa clarified that while minor performance improvements are possible, the primary goals are scalability and cost reduction. He confirmed that GRAIL is in discussion with the FDA regarding the appropriate bridging studies for the new assay.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to MARAVAI LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS (MRVI) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to MARAVAI LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS (MRVI) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    Tejas Savant from Morgan Stanley followed up on the strong China BST results, asking about potential pull-forward from tariff concerns. He also asked about long-term tailwinds from reshoring and potential headwinds from shifting NIH priorities away from infectious disease.

    Answer

    Executive Kevin Herde suggested their China distributor was likely securing supply but stopped short of calling it a pull-forward, reaffirming a flat outlook for China for the year. Executive William Martin noted the declining share of infectious disease programs is a sign of the maturing mRNA market. He emphasized that Maravai's U.S.-based vertical supply chain is a unique advantage in the current reshoring and trade environment.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to MARAVAI LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS (MRVI) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant of Morgan Stanley inquired about any potential headwinds from NIH and FDA changes that are factored into the 2025 guidance, and also asked about the company's growth assumptions for its China business.

    Answer

    Chief Financial Officer Kevin Herde responded that direct academic exposure is small, so any impact from NIH funding is not a major headwind but is considered in the low end of guidance. Regarding China, which accounted for $13.6 million in 2024 revenue, he stated the company is forecasting it to be flat for 2025, noting that any business shifting out of China has been quickly picked up in other APAC regions.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    Tejas Savant asked about the impact of the cautious pharma and biotech macro environment, requested a bridge from the old to new program metric, inquired about the evolution of tools offerings, and asked about opportunities in pharma reshoring.

    Answer

    Executive Jason Kelly acknowledged industry-wide headwinds for R&D services but stated Ginkgo's new Tools business is less affected as it focuses on winning market share. Executive Mark Dmytruk explained the new program metric excludes programs with minimal revenue while including smaller deals previously omitted, directing analysts to the appendix for historical data. He noted a conservative but promising outlook for Tools revenue. Jason Kelly added that Ginkgo could participate in pharma reshoring by providing its automation platform for quality control assays.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Ginkgo Bioworks Holdings (DNA) leadership • Q3 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant inquired about the impact of Ginkgo's narrowed strategic focus on resource utilization, potential attrition following the recent RIF, the state of biopharma funding, and confidence in Biosecurity funding after the election.

    Answer

    CEO Jason Kelly explained that focusing on core areas like government, pharma, and ag has improved efficiency and enabled cost reductions. He noted that while the biopharma funding environment shows 'green shoots,' it remains tough, but Ginkgo's early penetration stage provides some insulation. Regarding Biosecurity, Kelly highlighted a potential shift towards biodefense, which he believes has bipartisan support, ensuring continued relevance regardless of the administration.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Cytek Biosciences (CTKB) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to Cytek Biosciences (CTKB) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    Tejas Savant of Morgan Stanley inquired about the potential gross margin impact from recent tariff policies, whether pricing could be used as a mitigant, and the extent to which the 2025 guidance cut was due to sales challenges in China. He also asked about risks to the 2025 guidance from academic funding uncertainty in the U.S.

    Answer

    CFO William McCombe detailed Cytek's 'region-for-region' manufacturing strategy in the U.S., Singapore, and China to minimize tariff effects, estimating a limited gross margin impact of 1-3%. He clarified that products sold in China are manufactured locally or in Singapore, avoiding U.S. export tariffs. Both McCombe and CEO Wenbin Jiang confirmed that U.S. academic funding uncertainty is already factored into the revised 2025 guidance, noting that over 50% of revenue is ex-U.S. and that recurring revenue streams are less affected.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Cytek Biosciences (CTKB) leadership • Q3 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant asked about the drivers for the normalized U.S. demand, why Cytek's performance differs from peers, the Q4 budget flush assumptions, and any preliminary outlook for 2025.

    Answer

    CEO Wenbin Jiang attributed the company's resilience to flow cytometry being an essential, non-discretionary tool for labs, unlike other technologies. He also noted sequential improvement in the U.S. academic market. CFO William McCombe added that the Q4 forecast assumes a normal seasonal step-up, supported by the essential nature of their products. For 2025, McCombe declined to provide specific revenue guidance but stated the business model is designed to grow EBITDA through revenue growth and controlled operating expenses.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Natera (NTRA) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to Natera (NTRA) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    Tejas Savant asked about the difference in reimbursed Signatera test frequency between breast and colorectal cancer, and also inquired about potential Q1 business disruptions and the outlook for revenue seasonality in Q2.

    Answer

    CEO Steve Chapman confirmed that reimbursement cadence for Signatera varies by tumor type and that the current ASP has upside as more tests between standard surveillance points get covered. Executive Mike Brophy addressed seasonality, stating that while weather was a Q1 challenge, the time-sensitive nature of the tests mitigated the impact. Brophy expects normal Women's Health seasonality (Q2 dip) to be more noticeable this year, while Signatera and Prospera should continue their ramp.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Natera (NTRA) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant of Morgan Stanley asked about the technical rationale for tracking 64 markers in the new whole-genome Signatera panel, including COGS considerations, and inquired about the payer mix for the newly reimbursed lung cancer indication.

    Answer

    CEO Steve Chapman and General Manager of Oncology, Alex Aleshin, explained that 64 variants was determined to be the optimal number for the genome product to maximize performance while managing COGS, using their deep-sequencing multiplex PCR technology. CEO Steve Chapman and Executive Mike Brophy stated the Medicare mix for lung cancer is expected to be broadly similar to the rest of the business and that the pricing structure would likely follow the standard bundled approach.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Natera (NTRA) leadership • Q3 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant of Morgan Stanley asked about payer behavior, specifically prior authorizations and biomarker bill implementation risks. He also sought context on the upcoming 702 study's clinical significance and an update on Natera's cancer screening program timeline.

    Answer

    CEO Steve Chapman stated that while payer obstacles are constant, Natera's improved systems for handling them have been effective, and he hasn't noticed a significant recent change. Executive Mike Brophy noted a modest weather impact in Q3 and October. Chief Medical Officer Alexey Aleshin framed a clinically meaningful outcome for the 702 study, suggesting a hazard ratio below 0.8 for DFS/OS would be significant for a well-tolerated drug like Celebrex. Chapman confirmed the cancer screening data readout is planned for very early 2025.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to 10x Genomics (TXG) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to 10x Genomics (TXG) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    An analyst on behalf of Tejas Savant asked about the strong consumable sales in the APAC region, questioning if it was driven by a pull-forward of orders or customer stocking.

    Answer

    CFO Adam Taich attributed the strong performance in APAC to genuine underlying demand, particularly in China and Japan. He highlighted structural improvements, including a shift to a direct sales model in Japan and the positive impact of Japan's fiscal year-end occurring in Q1, as key drivers of the robust results.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to 10x Genomics (TXG) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant requested color on the gross margin cadence for 2025 and asked about the recent legal settlement, including whether it involved ongoing royalties and how it might influence the case with Bruker.

    Answer

    CFO Adam Taich projected that 2025 gross margin would be in a similar range to 2024, though it could face pressure from a higher mix of Xenium instruments or competitively priced large projects. CEO Serge Saxonov expressed that the company was 'extremely happy' with the settlement outcome as it validated their IP investments, but he did not disclose specific terms or comment on other litigation.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to 10x Genomics (TXG) leadership • Q3 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant inquired about the primary driver for the Q4 guidance reduction, questioning whether it was the internal commercial reorganization or worsening macroeconomic conditions. He also sought clarity on future gross margin trends and the company's timeline to achieve cash flow positivity, given new lower-priced products.

    Answer

    CFO Adam Taich clarified that the guidance reduction was split roughly 50/50 between macro headwinds and the internal commercial reorganization. He noted that the company no longer expects a typical Q4 seasonal uplift in CapEx and large projects. Regarding margins, Taich stated the new lower-priced products have comparable gross margins to the existing portfolio. He affirmed the company's focus on cash management, noting they were close to cash flow positive for the year absent a one-time payment in Q1.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Stevanato Group S.p.A. (STVN) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to Stevanato Group S.p.A. (STVN) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    Tejas Savant sought clarification on the extent of mitigation benefits included in the €4.5 million tariff impact guidance and asked if tariffs could drive vendor consolidation, creating a share-gain opportunity for Stevanato.

    Answer

    CFO Marco Dal Lago confirmed the guidance includes some mitigation benefits, like logistic optimizations, with more initiatives being explored. CEO Franco Stevanato positioned the tariffs as a short-term issue, stating that the company's proactive investment in its U.S. Fishers plant creates a significant long-term strategic advantage and strengthens its position as a key partner for customers.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Stevanato Group S.p.A. (STVN) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant of Morgan Stanley requested a breakdown of High-Value Solutions revenue by geography and manufacturing location to assess tariff impacts, and also asked if the BARDA funding for the Fishers facility was at risk.

    Answer

    CFO Marco Dal Lago noted that North America represents about 26% of total revenue with a high concentration of HVS, justifying the Fishers investment. Chairman and CEO Franco Stevanato highlighted the global footprint's flexibility. Regarding BARDA, Executive Lisa Miles explicitly stated there has been no indication from the government of any risk to the existing grant.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Cryoport (CYRX) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to Cryoport (CYRX) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    An analyst on behalf of Tejas Savant asked about market traction for new products like the HV3 and HE 800, and requested an update on the IntegriCell client onboarding process and the timeline for meaningful revenue contribution.

    Answer

    Chief Scientific Officer Dr. Mark Sawicki reported that the HV3 shipper is being well-received and adopted for commercial therapies over the next 12-18 months. CFO Robert Stefanovich clarified the HV3 is part of services revenue and that the MVE HE 800 freezer is too new for comment. On IntegriCell, Dr. Sawicki described a smooth onboarding process with multiple contracts, including with a top 10 pharma, noting the tech transfer and verification process takes a few quarters.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to VERACYTE (VCYT) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to VERACYTE (VCYT) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    Tejas Savant questioned the rationale for the Afirma v2 transcriptome switch, MRD test sensitivity, and the company's strategy and timeline for a potential digital pathology combo test with Decipher.

    Answer

    CEO Marc Stapley explained the v2 transcriptome was a planned optimization that also helps mitigate uncertain tariff impacts. For MRD, he emphasized that lead time to detection is the most critical clinical metric, not any single performance measure like sensitivity. Regarding digital pathology, Stapley stated that while Veracyte has extensive capabilities, the focus is on research collaboration as the commercial opportunity for a combo test is not yet clear and could cause clinical confusion.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to VERACYTE (VCYT) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    Yuko Oku, on behalf of Tejas Savant at Morgan Stanley, asked for Veracyte's perspective on the MRD market trend of pursuing both tumor-informed and tumor-naive approaches, and whether Veracyte might seek ADLT status for its MRD test.

    Answer

    CEO Marc Stapley affirmed their view that a tumor-informed approach is superior when tissue is available, but noted their whole-genome platform is well-suited for developing a tumor-naive option in the future. He clarified that ADLT status is not necessary for the initial bladder cancer launch due to an existing LCD, and the company's strategy focuses on securing appropriate reimbursement rather than specifically targeting ADLT.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL (CRL) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL (CRL) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    Tejas Savant asked for details on NHP studies for mAbs, the timeline for the strategic review, and whether further cost cuts are a priority.

    Answer

    CEO James Foster clarified that chronic NHP studies for mAbs represent a small, $50M portion of revenue and that waivers were already occurring. He stated the strategic review will take time and is unlikely to conclude by the next quarter. CFO Flavia Pease noted that while significant cost actions have been taken, the company always seeks efficiencies but does not want to impair its ability to respond to a market recovery.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL (CRL) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant asked about any CDMO cancellation payment benefits in Q4 or 2025, how the company is mitigating margin pressure from underutilization, and what proactive steps can be taken to de-risk the NHP supply chain following the CITES decision deferral.

    Answer

    EVP & CFO Flavia Pease confirmed that benefits from contractual obligations are embedded in the 2025 guidance and that margin expansion in the Manufacturing segment is still expected, driven by Microbial Solutions and cost-saving actions. Chair, President & CEO James Foster added that the company is actively working to diversify its NHP supply from multiple geographies to mitigate risks related to Cambodian supply.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to CHARLES RIVER LABORATORIES INTERNATIONAL (CRL) leadership • Q3 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant of Morgan Stanley asked for a long-term perspective on DSA margins, questioning the appropriate floor if demand remains weak. He also inquired about customer concentration in the CDMO business and any interest in acquiring competitor facilities amid BIOSECURE-related shifts.

    Answer

    Chairman, President and CEO James Foster explained that DSA margins are subject to supply/demand dynamics, with pricing power currently diminished but expected to return as demand improves. EVP and CFO Flavia Pease reiterated that the long-term goal of mid-to-high 20% margins remains intact, though the timing is uncertain. Foster added that while BIOSECURE should create opportunities, it's too early to see an impact, and the CDMO business continues to perform strongly on its own merits.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to NEOGENOMICS (NEO) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to NEOGENOMICS (NEO) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    Tejas Savant of Morgan Stanley inquired about the company's balance sheet flexibility for investments in NGS, MRD, and potential tuck-in acquisitions after paying down the 2025 convertible notes, considering the upcoming 2028 notes. He also asked about the expected ordering patterns for PanTracer liquid and tissue tests and the possibility of accelerating the next-gen MRD assay timeline.

    Answer

    CFO Jeff Sherman expressed confidence in the balance sheet, noting that Q1 is the highest cash burn quarter and that the company expects to be free cash flow positive in 2026, providing flexibility for the 2028 notes and ongoing investments. President & COO Warren Stone anticipates concurrent ordering of PanTracer tissue and liquid tests, particularly for lung cancer, driven by guidelines and physician preference. CIO Andrew Lukowiak described the 2027 MRD launch timeline as 'aggressive but achievable' and confirmed that analytical validation for RaDaR 1.1 is complete.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to NEOGENOMICS (NEO) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant questioned the long-term philosophy on shared economics for partner assays, how sales incentives would be managed for overlapping products, and the expected EBITDA margin exit rate for Q4 2025.

    Answer

    Head of Strategy Kareem Saad and CCO Warren Stone emphasized that partnerships focus on complementary products to minimize overlap and serve existing call points. CEO Christopher Smith noted sales incentives are structured to drive focus on specific products. CFO Jeff Sherman projected a typical seasonal pattern for EBITDA, with Q1 being the weakest and margins building through the year, leading to a Q1 2026 reset that is still up year-over-year.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to NEOGENOMICS (NEO) leadership • Q3 2024

    Question

    Representing Tejas Savant, an analyst asked about the impact of soft demand from large pharma customers on the Advanced Diagnostics segment and whether broader payer pushback on genetic testing could affect NeoGenomics.

    Answer

    CEO Chris Smith and CCO Warren Stone acknowledged a market slowdown in pharma services but see signs of it bottoming out, stating they are not observing increased price sensitivity. On the payer front, CFO Jeff Sherman noted that while not in the specific space mentioned (behavioral health), the passage of state-level biomarker legislation is a positive long-term driver for reimbursement in oncology.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Tempus AI (TEM) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to Tempus AI (TEM) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    Tejas Savant asked for details on the $200 million AstraZeneca/Pathos deal, inquiring about interest from other pharma companies for similar foundation models and the specifics of the deal's revenue recognition and financial structure.

    Answer

    CEO Eric Lefkofsky confirmed significant interest from other pharma companies following the announcement, noting the excitement was greater than expected. He explained the three-way partnership leveraged Pathos's work alongside Tempus's data. CFO Jim Rogers clarified that the $200 million will be recognized roughly ratably over the three-year term, similar to other large subscriptions, and is not triggered by upfront cash payments. Eric Lefkofsky added that he expects all payments to be made in cash.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Tempus AI (TEM) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant inquired about the integration timeline for bringing Tempus's somatic workflows to Ambry's West Coast lab, the expected seasonality in the Ambry business, the financial impact of a data project that slipped from Q4, and the risk profile of the data revenue contribution in the 2025 guidance.

    Answer

    CEO Eric Lefkofsky stated that moving somatic assays to Ambry's lab is a longer-term initiative for redundancy, planned over the next 1-2 years. CFO Jim Rogers explained that Ambry's seasonality is similar to Tempus's but expects sequential growth throughout the year. Lefkofsky clarified the slipped data delivery was over $10 million and a matter of timing, not a client issue. Rogers added that the $940 million in total remaining contract value provides strong visibility for 2025 data revenue.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Tempus AI (TEM) leadership • Q3 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant inquired about the strategic rationale for acquiring Ambry Genetics, the sustainability of its growth, and Tempus's capacity to integrate the new business while advancing its existing somatic and MRD portfolios. He also asked for clarification on the sequential growth of the Data and Services TCV and visibility into the expected Q4 revenue step-up.

    Answer

    CEO Eric Lefkofsky explained that Ambry fits squarely into Tempus's strategy of providing comprehensive, end-to-end patient care and that Ambry is taking market share with a stable growth outlook. He affirmed that the MRD portfolio's ramp is gated by reimbursement, not internal focus. Regarding the data business, Lefkofsky noted strong performance despite subsiding market tailwinds. CFO Jim Rogers confirmed the TCV remains "north of $900 million," providing strong visibility, and noted that a Q4 step-up in data revenue is typical due to pharma budget cycles.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to MYRIAD GENETICS (MYGN) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to MYRIAD GENETICS (MYGN) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    Tejas Savant of Morgan Stanley asked about expectations for Myriad's MRD test, including upcoming data at ASCO and the sensitivity threshold required for clinical adoption. He also asked about CEO Sam Raha's strategic philosophy and the specific reasons for GeneSight's underperformance in the quarter.

    Answer

    CEO Samraat Raha highlighted an upcoming MRD podium presentation at ASCO and stated that a sensitivity of 2-5 parts per million is the key threshold for low-shedding cancers. He described his leadership philosophy as focused on simplification and execution excellence. COO Mark Verratti attributed the GeneSight volume weakness to a deliberate reduction in marketing investment made in Q1 in response to the UnitedHealthcare coverage change.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to MYRIAD GENETICS (MYGN) leadership • Q3 2024

    Question

    Speaking for Tejas Savant, an analyst from Morgan Stanley asked if payers, facing cost pressures, might view pharmacogenomics as 'low-hanging fruit' for claim denials and whether Myriad has received inbounds from other payers following the UnitedHealthcare decision.

    Answer

    President and CEO Paul Diaz acknowledged broad payer cost pressures but argued that GeneSight improves payer MLR by reducing other healthcare costs associated with depression and anxiety. He stated they have had no inbound calls from other payers and do not expect them to follow United's policy, as other coverage decisions are tied to national and local determinations, not a single commercial payer's policy.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to IQVIA HOLDINGS (IQV) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to IQVIA HOLDINGS (IQV) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    Tejas Savant asked about any stranded costs from the delayed mega trial and the risk of the second trial also slipping. He also inquired about specific organic or M&A actions being taken to capitalize on policy-driven opportunities in real-world evidence.

    Answer

    EVP and CFO Ron Bruehlman stated there was a small but not significant impact from stranded costs, as resources from the delayed trial will be reallocated. He confirmed they are proceeding based on the client's plan for the second trial. Chairman and CEO Ari Bousbib added that IQVIA is recognized as the industry leader in RWE and is well-positioned to capitalize on emerging opportunities, expressing overall optimism based on current metrics and client conversations.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to SOPHiA GENETICS (SOPH) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to SOPHiA GENETICS (SOPH) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    On behalf of Tejas Savant from Morgan Stanley, a representative asked for details on the traction from the AstraZeneca collaboration, its impact on volume and ASP, and whether the balance sheet is sufficient to reach the 2027 adjusted EBITDA breakeven target.

    Answer

    Co-Founder and CEO Jurgi Camblong and President Ross Muken detailed that the AstraZeneca partnership, which began with HRD testing, has expanded to include MSK-ACCESS and MSK-IMPACT, contributing to one of the company's fastest new product launches. They noted growing interest from other top pharma companies like J&J. CFO George Cardoza affirmed confidence in the balance sheet, citing over $100 million in available liquidity ($68M cash + $35M credit line) as sufficient to reach the adjusted EBITDA profitability goal in 2027, given shrinking losses and disciplined expense control.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to SOPHiA GENETICS (SOPH) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant of Morgan Stanley inquired about the geographic split (U.S. vs. OUS) of the MSK-ACCESS/IMPACT pipeline, the potential impact of NIH cost caps, and the assumptions underlying the 2025 guidance and path to profitability.

    Answer

    Co-Founder and CEO Dr. Jurgi Camblong noted the U.S. is the company's strongest growth market. President Ross Muken described the MSK pipeline enthusiasm as "quite balanced globally." Regarding NIH caps, Camblong stated the company's exposure is minimal. CFO George Cardoza addressed guidance, expecting about $0.60 of each incremental sales dollar to drop to the bottom line and reiterated the goal of approaching adjusted EBITDA breakeven by year-end 2026. He also noted a modest negative FX impact is factored into the 2025 guide.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to SOPHiA GENETICS (SOPH) leadership • Q3 2024

    Question

    An analyst on behalf of Tejas Savant from Morgan Stanley inquired about the status of pricing headwinds across different regions and asked for an update on the progress of the whole genome application being developed with Microsoft and NVIDIA.

    Answer

    President Ross Muken acknowledged modest pricing pressure continued in Spain but noted stabilization in France and Italy. He stated that the overall pricing trend remains a long-term positive, aided by a product mix shift to higher-ASP applications. Co-Founder and CEO Dr. Jurgi Camblong confirmed that the whole genome application is progressing as planned to meet market demand for more comprehensive sequencing.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to HOLOGIC (HOLX) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to HOLOGIC (HOLX) leadership • Q2 2025

    Question

    Tejas Savant asked for clarification on the 60 basis point reduction in the organic ex-COVID growth guidance, questioning if factors beyond China and tariffs, such as Africa or Breast Health weakness, were involved. He also questioned if Hologic is reconsidering its premium pricing strategy for the upcoming Envision gantry.

    Answer

    CFO Karleen Oberton confirmed the guidance reduction was primarily due to the revenue takedown in China and a larger-than-expected impact from funding cuts in Africa. COO Essex Mitchell addressed pricing, stating the company remains confident in the value proposition of the Envision platform, which is comparable to the current premium-priced 3Dimensions system, and will focus on creative acquisition models for customers.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to HOLOGIC (HOLX) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    Tejas Savant inquired about lessons learned from the Breast Health forecast revision beyond market dynamics and asked for a portfolio-level overview of manufacturing exposure to potential tariffs.

    Answer

    CEO Stephen MacMillan admitted that management was 'a little overeager' and should have more deeply challenged the growth assumptions for the gantry market post-chip shortage. He expressed confidence in the new leadership team in that division. On tariffs, CFO Karleen Oberton identified Costa Rica, where surgical and disposable breast products are made, as the largest potential exposure. Mr. MacMillan added that a majority of gantries and molecular diagnostics are manufactured in the U.S., which provides a strategic benefit.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to HOLOGIC (HOLX) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    For Tejas Savant, an analyst asked if Hologic expects to recoup any of the lost Skeletal Health sales in fiscal 2025 after shipments resume. He also requested quantification of the financial impact from discontinuing the Bioabsorb product.

    Answer

    Chief Financial Officer Karleen Oberton stated that the financial impact from the Bioabsorb product withdrawal is de minimis, as it was a revenue line item of less than $10 million in 2024. Regarding Skeletal Health, she said the immediate focus is on getting the product back on the market to satisfy customer demand and did not project a specific level of sales recapture for fiscal 2025.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Avantor (AVTR) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to Avantor (AVTR) leadership • Q1 2025

    Question

    Tejas Savant requested a bridge for the 200 basis point reduction in the organic growth forecast, asking for a breakdown of the impact from different headwinds. He also asked why the current tariff and supply chain environment isn't a more significant share gain opportunity for Avantor against smaller distributors.

    Answer

    CFO R. Jones attributed the guidance reduction primarily to the policy environment impacting Lab Solutions and weaker biotech funding, essentially extending Q1 trends for the full year. CEO Michael Stubblefield responded that the company is uniquely positioned to help customers navigate the complex environment, which enhances its value proposition and does present an opportunity. He stated they are aggressively pursuing this but are not seeing a trend of customers disintermediating them due to the strength of their supply chain and service model.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Avantor (AVTR) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant asked for modeling clarifications on FX impact, confirmation of the long-term double-digit growth expectation for bioprocessing, and whether the company might revisit its M&A strategy sooner given the market environment.

    Answer

    An Unknown Executive provided specific FX headwind figures for revenue, EBITDA, and EPS. CEO Michael Stubblefield reaffirmed conviction in long-term double-digit bioprocessing growth. On M&A, he stated that while debt paydown is the priority, the company will have more flexibility once leverage is below 3.0x, and M&A remains a key part of the long-term strategy.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Avantor (AVTR) leadership • Q3 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant asked for an update on sentiment among mid-cap biotech customers and potential catalysts for improvement. He also inquired about business trends in Europe, particularly concerning potential government spending trade-offs.

    Answer

    President and CEO Michael Stubblefield observed a mixed biotech environment, with smaller firms still pressured but larger, established biotechs returning to growth. He identified Europe as Avantor's strongest geography in Q3, outperforming the Americas, helped by its end-market mix which includes less relative exposure to preclinical biotech and strong performance in applied markets.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Guardant Health (GH) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to Guardant Health (GH) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant asked for an update on the timing for a potential ACS guideline inclusion for Shield and questioned how a potential adverse Supreme Court ruling on the USPSTF mandate might impact Guardant's commercial strategy.

    Answer

    Co-CEO AmirAli Talasaz expressed optimism for ACS guideline inclusion for Shield sometime in 2025 but noted the exact timing is uncertain. Regarding the Supreme Court case, he stated that Guardant's current commercial focus is on the Medicare population, which would not be impacted by the ruling, and that the company is monitoring the situation closely.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Guardant Health (GH) leadership • Q3 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant sought a more precise estimate on the quantum of clinical volume acceleration expected in 2025 beyond the 20% floor. He also asked about operational lessons from the Shield launch, including lab setup and any pushback from health systems regarding quality scores.

    Answer

    CFO Michael Bell reiterated confidence in accelerating clinical volume growth above 20% in 2025, driven by Guardant360, TissueNext, and Reveal, but declined to provide a more specific number. Co-CEO AmirAli Talasaz noted that learnings from the LDT phase were incorporated into the successful IVD launch, with about 15% of current orders coming via EMR integration. He added that the company is strategically avoiding health systems highly sensitive to quality scores until guidelines are updated.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA (PACB) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA (PACB) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant inquired about the customer concentration risk embedded in the 2025 guidance, citing key projects in EMEA and the Berry Genomics partnership in China. He also asked about any customer concerns in China following competitor Illumina's addition to an 'unreliable entity list'.

    Answer

    President and CEO Christian Henry acknowledged the concentration with large-scale projects but noted the risk is mitigated as more customers, particularly in diagnostics, are scaling up to become large users themselves. Regarding China, he stated that PacBio has not seen any negative impact or customer concern, as there are no local long-read alternatives. He added that the main unpredictable risk in the region relates to potential changes in U.S. export policy.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA (PACB) leadership • Q3 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant of Morgan Stanley inquired about customer feedback on the new SPRQ chemistry's $500 genome cost versus short-reads and the market opportunity unlocked by lower DNA input requirements. He also asked about the Vega platform's theoretical maximum pull-through and the market appetite for in-house long-read sequencing versus outsourcing.

    Answer

    CEO Christian Henry described feedback on SPRQ as "remarkable," noting the sub-$500 price for large projects is a catalyst and that the reduced DNA input requirement unlocks potentially millions of samples. For Vega, Henry clarified the theoretical max pull-through is around $250,000 and explained that it will ultimately drive more demand to service providers by making HiFi sequencing more ubiquitous and putting pressure on service pricing.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Adaptive Biotechnologies (ADPT) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to Adaptive Biotechnologies (ADPT) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant of Morgan Stanley asked for clarification on the timing of pharma MRD milestones, the impact of the NovaSeq transition on sample turnaround times, and the potential regulatory path and upside for the digital in silico model being developed with Genentech.

    Answer

    CFO Kyle Piskel advised modeling the $6-7 million in pharma milestones evenly throughout the year. Chief Scientific Officer Harlan Robins explained the NovaSeq transition will not impact turnaround times as current volumes allow for daily batching. Regarding the Genentech partnership, CEO Chad Robins noted they are not yet at the regulatory stage, while Harlan Robins highlighted the model's potential for massive time and cost advantages in personalized cell therapy and other applications.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to Adaptive Biotechnologies (ADPT) leadership • Q3 2024

    Question

    Representing Tejas Savant, an analyst asked about potential challenges from private payers given broader industry trends and inquired if Roche's recent pipeline reorganization had affected the Genentech partnership.

    Answer

    CEO Chad Robins addressed payer concerns by emphasizing clonoSEQ's strong value proposition and health economic benefits, such as guiding the cessation of expensive therapies. He also stated that Roche has assured them that their oncology research reorganization does not impact the ongoing partnership with Genentech.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to ILLUMINA (ILMN) leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to ILLUMINA (ILMN) leadership • Q4 2024

    Question

    Tejas Savant posed a strategic question about whether Illumina would support a reversal of BGI's exclusion from the U.S. market in exchange for access to China. He also asked for color on recent high-profile wins by competitors in proteomics and single-cell applications.

    Answer

    CEO Jacob Thaysen stated that competition is beneficial for the industry and that Illumina will compete based on its technology leadership. He deferred on the political question, saying decisions in Washington are for lawmakers. Regarding competitive deals, he noted that Illumina does not issue a press release for every win.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to AKYA leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to AKYA leadership • Q3 2024

    Question

    Asked for a breakdown of the Q3 shortfall, expected Q4 milestone revenue, potential NIH budget impacts from the election, customer hesitancy due to the company's situation, and the timeline for its strategic review.

    Answer

    Management attributed the Q3 miss primarily to macro CapEx pressures (~80-85%), with a smaller impact from the recent restructuring. They expect $2-3 million in service revenue in Q4 from delayed projects. They declined to speculate on election impacts but noted past NIH budget trends. They do not believe their strategic review is causing significant customer hesitancy and signaled confidence in finding a path forward without giving a specific timeline.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to AKYA leadership • Q2 2024

    Question

    Questioned the guidance cut in light of strong Q2 placements, asking about demand pull-forward and funnel weakness. Also inquired about the company's ability to grow after significant headcount reductions, organizational morale, balance sheet fortification, and the competitive/pricing environment.

    Answer

    The company stated there was no Q2 demand pull-forward; the guidance reflects a more realistic ramp given elongated sales cycles. The restructuring balances growth and profitability, and the path to breakeven strengthens their financial position for any future capital needs. Competitively, they feel they are in a strong position, winning head-to-head deals based on technology advantages, not pricing.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to AKYA leadership • Q1 2024

    Question

    Sought to clarify the drivers of the guidance cut, asking about the macro environment versus internal issues, trends in Q2, the impact of macro on field upgrades, potential pricing strategy changes, and recent trends in the China market.

    Answer

    Management confirmed the guidance cut was primarily driven by the temporary manufacturing disruption and a deferred lab services contract, not a worsening macro environment. They expect a sequential return to normal growth. While macro hasn't impacted field upgrades, they acknowledged the need to compete with competitors' demo placement strategies. In China, they've seen an uptick in grant support requests but no material change in performance, though the KR partnership offers a new avenue for growth.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to AKYA leadership • Q4 2023

    Question

    Asked about the reasons for lighter Q4 instrument placements, the impact of the academic budget environment on guidance, the company's long-term product development roadmap, and whether 2025 would be the first full year of cash flow breakeven.

    Answer

    Executives explained that lower Q4 placements were due to macro pressures and elongated, back-end loaded sales cycles, not competitive shifts. The 2024 guidance assumes current macro headwinds will persist. The product roadmap includes near-term workflow simplifications and long-term development of an IVD system and platforms for large-scale discovery. They affirmed that 2025 is expected to be a full year of positive operating cash flow.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI

    Tejas Savant's questions to CTLT leadership

    Tejas Savant's questions to CTLT leadership • Q4 2023

    Question

    Asked for a detailed bridge for the FY24 EBITDA guidance, the contribution from Sarepta, the timeline for the new strategic review, and whether a capital raise is anticipated.

    Answer

    The company explained the FY24 EBITDA bridge involves replacing declining high-margin COVID revenue with growth from a large gene therapy customer (Sarepta) and operational improvements at key sites. The strategic review is starting immediately with a sense of urgency, but no fixed timeline for reporting findings was given. A capital raise is not expected due to sufficient liquidity and a strong focus on improving working capital and cash flow.

    Ask Fintool Equity Research AI