Question · Q4 2025
Vishal Shreedhar asked about the discrepancy between management's previously articulated leverage target of mid-2s at closing and the current 3x net debt to pro forma adjusted EBITDA. He also inquired how the EPS CAGR guidance changed given the increased synergies and the consideration of HanesBrands Australia.
Answer
Luca Barile, EVP and CFO, attributed the 3x leverage to a slightly higher debt level at closing and adjustments to pro forma EBITDA, emphasizing the focus on delevering with over $850 million in free cash flow generation and potential HAA sale proceeds. He clarified that the EPS CAGR guidance remains consistent; the difference is due to HAA being classified as discontinued operations, with its $0.21 EPS contribution now reported separately.
Ask follow-up questions
Fintool can predict
GIL's earnings beat/miss a week before the call