Question · Q3 2025
William Grogesky of Greenbridge Capital asked for an estimate of the impact of one-time expenses related to Panama and food products on the Q3 2025 expense line. He also inquired about the EMP division's strong Q3 performance, its expected trend for Q4 and future halves, and the outlook for growth in core Nanochem product lines (oil, industrial) in 2026. Finally, he asked about the rationale behind the Mendota facility sale and leaseback and if EMP production would ever move to Peru.
Answer
Daniel O'Brien, President, CEO, CFO, CAO, and a Director, offered to provide specific numbers for one-time expenses via email, but noted they were responsible for a very large percentage of the Q3 loss. He highlighted EMP's strong Q3, attributing it to sales in the vibrant greenhouse, turf, and golf markets, and predicted a strong Q4, with second halves generally stronger than first halves due to customer early-buy trends. For core Nanochem, O'Brien stated that competitiveness from the Panama factory would determine growth in oil and industrial applications, and Flexible Solutions remains opportunistic. He explained the Mendota sale and leaseback was to limit risk, remove landlord responsibilities, and free up bandwidth, confirming that EMP production would remain there, while Peru would focus solely on food products.
Ask follow-up questions
Fintool can predict
FSI's earnings beat/miss a week before the call