AH
Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2024 revenue was $774.2M (+4.2% y/y), while diluted EPS fell to $0.35 and adjusted EPS to $0.64; adjusted EBITDA declined to $153.1M and margin compressed to 19.8% due to a $14.3M professional liability reserve increase, $11.2M start-up losses, and a $5M impact from a facility closure .
- Same-facility revenue rose 4.7% y/y on patient days +3.2% and revenue per patient day +1.4%; total facility revenue per patient day was $997 (+1.7% y/y) and same-facility adjusted EBITDA was $196.4M .
- FY 2025 guidance: revenue $3.3–$3.4B, adjusted EBITDA $675–$725M, adjusted EPS $2.50–$2.80; Q1 2025 guidance: revenue $765–$775M, adjusted EBITDA $130–$135M, with elevated start-up losses and lower supplemental payments expected in Q1 .
- Capital allocation/catalysts: new $300M share repurchase authorization; management highlighted a 2026 EBITDA/FCF inflection as start-up losses decline and CapEx moderates, and indicated plans to upsize the revolver to ~$1B in a refinancing disclosed in the 10-K context .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Same-facility growth: Revenue +4.7% y/y on patient day growth (+3.2%) and pricing (+1.4% revenue per patient day), showing resilient underlying demand .
- Capacity expansion and JV momentum: 577 newly licensed beds added in Q4; JV hospitals opened in Denver (Intermountain) and Detroit (Henry Ford), with 800–1,000 beds targeted for 2025 .
- Technology/quality investments: CEO detailed broad deployment of EMR, patient monitoring, and staff wearables, plus real-time dashboards with 50+ KPIs to drive safer, compliant care and operational effectiveness .
What Went Wrong
- Margin compression: Adjusted EBITDA margin fell to 19.8% from 22.8% y/y, driven by a $14M reserve increase for professional/general liability and $11.2M start-up losses; closure impacted revenue ($7M) and EBITDA ($5M) .
- Underperforming facilities: Management flagged a small group as a ~$20M EBITDA headwind embedded in FY25 guidance; turnaround timing remains uncertain .
- Supplemental payment timing: Revenue per patient day growth moderated versus Q3, with Q1 2025 net supplemental payments expected down $10–$15M y/y; full-year FY25 assumes flat to +$15M net supplemental payments .
Financial Results
KPIs and Operating Stats:
Estimate Comparison (Wall Street consensus):
- S&P Global consensus data for Q4 2024 and Q1 2025 was unavailable at time of analysis due to API rate limits; no comparison to consensus is provided [GetEstimates errors].
Guidance Changes
Assumptions embedded: start-up losses ~$50–$55M FY25 (up ~$25M y/y), net Medicaid supplemental payments $0–$15M FY25, Q1 2025 start-up losses ~$20M (up ~$15M y/y) and net supplemental payments down ~$10–$15M y/y .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “We believe we have led the industry in adopting the latest technology… helping us to deliver safe, quality care with positive clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction scores.”
- CEO: “We completed construction on approximately 1,300 beds in 2024… expect to add between 800 and 1,000 total beds this year.”
- CFO: “Adjusted EBITDA margin was 19.8%… prior year 22.8%… due to a $14M increase to reserves for self-insured professional and general liability claims… and $11.2M start-up losses.”
- CFO: “Our FY25 guidance assumes… ~$20M EBITDA headwind from [a] small group of underperforming facilities… same-facility RPPD growth in the low single digits.”
- CFO: “Total gross supplemental payments would be less than $200 million… a good ballpark for net is about two-thirds.”
- CFO: “We’ve refinanced the existing bank facilities and… upsizing our revolver to about $1 billion.”
Q&A Highlights
- Financing and liquidity: Management expects revolver upsizing to ~$1B and natural deleveraging as EBITDA grows; comfortable increasing leverage to fund buybacks within prudent thresholds .
- Bridge from Q1 to full-year: Q1 is a low contributor given start-up losses (~$20M, ~35%–40% of FY total) and supplemental payment timing; Q2 likely similarly below typical cadence with improvement second half .
- Underperforming facilities: Actions include local competitive review, programming, BD funnel, admissions process, leadership assessment, tech adherence (EMR/monitoring), and physical plant improvements .
- Returns on de novo/JV amid higher construction costs: Management still sees attractive returns supported by rate improvement and volume ramp into 2026 .
- Pricing outlook: Conservative posture given policy noise; commercial rate environment expected stable; CTC tailwind normalizing after outsized growth in 2023–early 2024 .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus (EPS, revenue, EBITDA) for Q4 2024 and Q1 2025 was unavailable at time of analysis due to API limits, so beats/misses versus Wall Street cannot be assessed. The company’s own Q1 guide embeds higher start-up losses and lower net supplemental payments, which may drive near-term estimate conservatism, while FY25 assumes a $20M EBITDA headwind from underperformers and liability expense +$10M y/y .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term setup: Expect softer Q1 (and potentially Q2) due to elevated start-up losses and supplemental payment timing; model cadence improving in second half .
- Structural demand intact: Same-facility growth and RPPD resiliency support the thesis; technology/quality investments differentiate operations and mitigate risk .
- Capacity-driven growth: Record beds added in 2024 with 800–1,000 targeted for 2025; embedded EBITDA from 1,600–1,800 beds supports a 2026 earnings inflection .
- Margin watchpoints: Liability reserving (+$14M in Q4, +$10M y/y in FY25) and underperforming facilities (~$20M FY25 headwind) explain recent compression; upside if remediation progresses faster .
- Supplemental payments: Gross exposure < $200M; net typically ~two-thirds; cadence is lumpy—monitor Tennessee program timing and state-directed dynamics .
- Capital allocation: $300M buyback authorization provides potential support; revolver upsizing to ~$1B enhances flexibility ahead of an expected FCF inflection by end of 2026 .
- JV pipeline: Partnerships with leading systems (Intermountain, Henry Ford) deepen market presence and may accelerate volume ramp as licensing and operations mature .
Additional notes:
- Cross-reference: Q4 2024 press release cites 163 CTCs across 33 states, while Q3 2024 press release cited 164 across 32 states—likely timing/classification differences; monitor future disclosures for consistency .