Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
- AAR's distribution and USM segments both performed strongly in the quarter, with distribution experiencing a growing backlog and expectations of continued growth due to new contracts, indicating strong business momentum.
- USM growth accelerated from Q1 to Q2, with more assets available and more opportunities, and the company expects this growth to continue in the balance of the fiscal year, potentially leading to increased revenue.
- AAR's strong sourcing capabilities allow them to acquire assets ahead of competitors, positioning them well to capitalize on opportunities in USM and support future growth.
- AAR's Parts Supply segment experienced a decrease in EBITDA margin from 13.2% to 12.4% year-over-year, primarily due to lower-margin whole asset sales, which could indicate potential margin pressure in this segment.
- The recent improvement in the Used Serviceable Material (USM) business may not be sustainable, as management noted it's too early to determine if increased asset availability is a lasting trend.
- Expanding into PMA parts could risk AAR's relationships with OEM partners, potentially leading to conflicts that may impact future distribution agreements.
| Metric | Period | Previous Guidance | Current Guidance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sales Growth | Q3 2025 | 18% to 22% | 22% to 25% | raised |
Adjusted Operating Margin | Q3 2025 | 9.1% | 9.2% to 9.4% | raised |
Net Interest Expense | Q3 2025 | $18.3 million | $18.8 million | raised |
Effective Tax Rate | Q3 2025 | no prior guidance | 27% | no prior guidance |
| Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
Distribution and Parts Supply Growth | Consistently positive narrative in Q1 2025, Q4 2024 and Q3 2024 with strong growth numbers, double-digit increases in distribution sales, and improvement in backlog support ( ). | Very strong performance in Q2 2025 with a 20% year-over-year growth, new multiyear agreements (e.g. with Whippany and Chromalloy) and emphasis on an independent distribution model driving both growth and backlog strength ( ). | Consistent positive momentum; the narrative remains upbeat with enhanced emphasis on exclusive agreements and robust backlog support. |
USM Business Performance and Supply Constraints | Mixed performance in prior periods: Q1 2025 saw a 22% decline due to limited whole asset availability ( ), while Q4 2024 reported modest growth and Q3 2024 highlighted record day-to-day parts sales despite constraints on large assets ( ). | USM rebounded in Q2 2025 with renewed growth driven by increased availability of whole assets and strong demand, though margins remain more transactional ( ). | Improvement from earlier setbacks; sentiment shifts from earlier challenges to a more positive outlook as USM posts renewed growth. |
Government Sales Trends and Contract Recovery | Prior periods reflected a recovery trend: Q1 2025 reported a 20% increase driven by major wins (e.g. Navy contracts) ( ); Q4 2024 and Q3 2024 noted turnaround and early signs of recovery after previous declines, backed by higher bookings and improved government distribution ( ). | In Q2 2025, government sales grew by 16% year-over-year with new contract wins (including a DoD contract) and continuing pipeline strength in new parts distribution ( ). | Steady recovery and growth in the government segment; the trend is consistently improving across periods with a clear focus on converting new contracts into revenue. |
Operating Margins and Profitability Dynamics | Across prior periods (Q1 2025, Q4 2024, Q3 2024) the company reported continuous margin expansion. Adjusted operating margins climbed (e.g. Q1 margins at 9.1%, Q4 margins improving by 150 bps, and Q3 margins increasing for 12 consecutive quarters), driven by efficiency gains and acquisitions ( ). | Q2 2025 reported improved margins – adjusted operating margin increased from 8.1% to 9.2% – with positive contributions from cost synergies in the Product Support acquisition and ongoing operational improvements ( ). | Consistent upward trend; the company maintains a focus on driving profitability through synergies and efficiency while targeting further margin expansion. |
Acquisition Strategy and Financial Leverage Impact | Previous calls (Q1 2025, Q4 2024, Q3 2024) emphasized strategic acquisitions such as TRAX and the Triumph Product Support acquisition, with discussions on achieving cost synergies, margin accretion, and gradual deleveraging from around 3.6x to targets near 2x ( ). | Q2 2025 continued this focus with integration progress on the TPS acquisition, ongoing interest in aftermarket acquisitions, and improved financial leverage (net leverage reduced from 3.6x to 3.17x), all while targeting a 2x net leverage within two years ( ). | Steady focus on growth through acquisitions with disciplined deleveraging; sentiment remains positive regarding integration synergies and improving leverage metrics. |
Working Capital Management and Free Cash Flow Challenges | Q1 2025 discussions noted working capital headwinds due to inventory investments and seasonal cash burn ( ). Q3 2024 elaborated on heavy inventory investments impacting free cash flow, with seasonal variations and a commitment to disciplined working capital management ( ). Q4 2024 did not provide details. | Q2 2025 statements were less detailed but indicated that free cash flow should follow a similar positive trajectory as in prior years, with Q3 expected to be positive and Q4 stronger, contributing toward deleveraging efforts (<strong> </strong>). | Recurring challenge with a cautiously optimistic tone; while inventory investments continue to pressure free cash flow, management expects normalization in subsequent quarters. |
OEM Relationships Risk and PMA Parts Expansion | Q4 2024 highlighted a strong independent OEM distribution model and progress with FAA-approved PMA initiatives ( ). Q3 2024 detailed active expansion of PMA capabilities with Triumph’s portfolio and stressed that these efforts do not conflict with OEM relationships ( ). Q1 2025 did not discuss this topic. | Q2 2025 explicitly addressed managing OEM relationships to avoid conflict and detailed an exclusive distribution agreement with Chromalloy as part of PMA parts expansion, along with ongoing discussions to further expand PMA offerings ( ). | Emerging emphasis and clarity; discussion on OEM risk and PMA expansion has become more explicit and structured, reflecting a proactive approach to growth in this high-margin area. |
Investigation and Contract Termination Cost Concerns | Q3 2024 mentioned $2 million in investigation costs as part of SG&A and Q1 2025 noted recurring investigation expenses along with contract termination costs related to Expeditionary Services ( ). Q4 2024 had no discussion. | Q2 2025 detailed the resolution of FCPA-related issues with a $55.6 million settlement and disclosed a noncash pretax loss of approximately $60 million due to the landing gear divestiture, highlighting a more definitive resolution and restructuring of cost concerns ( ). | Transition from recurring small expenses to a more significant, resolved event; the focus has shifted from ongoing investigation costs to recognizing a major settlement and associated termination costs, reflecting a maturing of risk management. |
-
USM Business Outlook
Q: Is the worst behind us for USM; have we turned a corner?
A: Early signs are encouraging; supply has loosened this quarter, meeting high demand, potentially accelerating USM growth. We saw growth this quarter and expect more through the fiscal year. -
Margin Expansion
Q: How do you see Parts Supply margins trending into the second half?
A: We expect margin expansion in the second half versus the first, driven by new distribution agreements ramping up and growth in USM. Q3 margins should expand, with further expansion in Q4. -
USM Asset Availability and Pricing
Q: What's driving increased asset availability for USM, and how is pricing?
A: Asset availability increased due to our sourcing efforts, though it's situational. Pricing remains very strong; values aren't accelerating as before but are still robust, preserving our spreads. -
New Distribution Agreements Impact
Q: How quickly will new agreements like Chromalloy and Whippany contribute?
A: Chromalloy will contribute immediately, ramping to full run rate by fiscal year-end. Whippany will ramp over multiple quarters, contributing more in FY '26 due to channel dynamics. -
Managing OEM Relationships with PMA Growth
Q: How are you managing potential conflicts with OEM partners as you expand in PMA?
A: We manage relationships carefully, avoiding conflicts. We focus on parts without conflicts, targeting areas where OEM partnerships aren't affected. -
Leverage and M&A Amid Rising Rates
Q: What's your long-term view on net leverage and M&A given rising interest rates?
A: Deleveraging is a focus; aiming for 2x net leverage two years post-acquisition. Rising rates affect floating debt, but we're prioritizing paying down debt. We'll continue to pursue aftermarket acquisitions while integrating TPS. -
R&E Margins Post Landing Gear Divestiture
Q: How will R&E margins change after shedding the landing gear business?
A: Margin expansion will come from TPS synergies realized in Q1 next fiscal year and hangar expansion. Landing gear will exit results after deal closes, improving margins. -
Distribution and USM Performance
Q: Will there be a period when both distribution and USM perform well simultaneously?
A: Yes, they clicked this quarter. Distribution continues strong with growing backlog; USM saw strong demand and asset availability, positively impacting results. -
Parts Supply Margins Decline Concern
Q: Is there concern over Parts Supply EBITDA margins declining year-over-year?
A: No concern; decline driven by lower-margin whole asset sales this year. It's situational based on asset availability and costs. Pipeline is stronger moving forward. -
Government Efficiency and PMA
Q: How can PMA fit into government efficiency efforts?
A: PMA is part of the conversation, but greater impact comes from used parts utilization. For example, selling used C-40 aircraft saved the government about $60 million on two aircraft. -
Exposure to Low-Cost Carriers
Q: What's your revenue exposure to ultra-low-cost carriers?
A: Minimal exposure; our largest customers are United, Delta, American. Business with lower-cost carriers is a very small part in North America. -
Organic Growth Numbers
Q: Do you have organic growth numbers for commercial and government?
A: We don't disclose organic growth by activity. Inorganic growth came from TPS, mostly commercial. Second half was close to that, but no specific numbers provided. -
Free Cash Flow Outlook
Q: How is the full-year free cash flow outlook shaping up?
A: Similar trajectory to last year: positive cash in Q3 and stronger Q4, aiding deleveraging alongside EBITDA growth. -
Impact of Low-Cost Carriers' Viability
Q: Given concerns about low-cost carriers, how might that impact you?
A: Since our exposure to ULCCs is minimal, we're not significantly impacted. Major carriers are our primary customers. -
Quantifying USM Growth
Q: Can you quantify USM growth and its potential upside?
A: We aren't breaking out specific growth figures, but USM accelerated from Q1 to Q2. More assets are available, fueling growth expected to continue if we capture those assets. -
PMA Parts Distribution Restrictions
Q: Are there restrictions preventing distribution of Chromalloy PMA parts for CFM56 and V2500?
A: We're aware of Chromalloy's PMA portfolio. We're discussing with Chromalloy and FTAI, always looking for ways to grow the business together.