AC
AAR CORP (AIR)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Record Q3 FY25 sales of $678.2M (+20% YoY) and adjusted EPS of $0.99 (+16% YoY); GAAP EPS was $(0.25) driven by a $63.7M pre-tax charge tied to the Landing Gear Overhaul divestiture .
- Mixed vs Wall Street: EPS beat ($0.99 vs $0.964*) while revenue missed ($678.2M vs $699.1M*); EBITDA slightly below consensus ($77.4M vs $79.2M*) but company-reported adjusted EBITDA was $81.2M .
- Margins expanded: adjusted operating margin 9.7% (up from 8.3% YoY and 9.2% QoQ); strength in Parts Distribution, Trax, and airframe MRO efficiency offset USM volume timing headwinds .
- Portfolio optimization catalyst: closing of $51M sale of Landing Gear Overhaul post-quarter; management guides Q4 sales growth mid-single digits (high-single digits excluding Landing Gear), adjusted operating margin 9.7%–9.9%, net interest expense ~$18M, tax rate ~30% .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Parts Distribution and MRO execution drove margin expansion; adjusted EBITDA rose 39% YoY to $81.2M and adjusted operating margin improved to 9.7% from 8.3% .
Quote: “We are particularly proud of the progress on EBITDA margin… our internal initiatives to drive efficiency improvements continue to produce meaningful results” — CEO John Holmes . - Repair & Engineering surged: sales +53% YoY to $215.9M; adjusted EBITDA +110% to $27.9M; integration of Product Support on track; hangars near capacity with good efficiency .
- Trax momentum: Cathay Pacific win and strong margins (Trax is highest-margin business), pipeline strengthening; integrated solutions’ adjusted EBITDA +11% YoY .
What Went Wrong
- USM volume timing: engine shop inputs at certain customers deferred, driving lower-than-expected USM demand; management expects temporary effect and signs of material loosening .
- Higher net interest expense: $18.1M vs $11.3M YoY due to debt for Product Support acquisition; deleveraging progressing but financing cost remains a drag .
- Operating cash flow used: $(18.7)M in Q3 (adjusted $(15.0)M excluding AR financing), reflecting $56M FCPA settlement payment in the quarter .
Financial Results
Consolidated Financials vs Prior Periods
Q3 FY25 vs Wall Street Estimates (S&P Global)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Segment Sales and Operating Income (Q3 YoY)
KPIs and Balance Sheet Highlights
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Sales were 20% higher than in the same quarter last year as demand remains elevated for our aftermarket services… Repair & Engineering segment sales increased more than 53% year-over-year, with significant contributions from the Product Support acquisition” — CEO John Holmes .
- “We expect further margin expansion through growth in new parts Distribution, Trax, Airframe MRO efficiencies and the realization of Product Support synergies… net leverage [down] to 3.06x” — Holmes .
- “Part supply… new parts distribution continues to drive exceptional growth… better-than-expected margins due to favorable product mix and scaling efficiencies” — Holmes .
- “We reduced our net debt leverage from 3.17x to 3.06x despite having an operating cash use of $19M due to the FCPA settlement of $56M… expect to continue to delever” — CFO Sean Gillen .
Q&A Highlights
- USM dynamics: Lower quarter due to customer engine maintenance deferrals; expected to rebound; whole assets supply improving; extended exclusive CFM56 arrangement with FTAI through 2030 .
- Trax scaling: Cathay and Singapore deals accretive; robust pipeline; Trax poised to become parts sales channel later this calendar year .
- Tariffs: Not stockpiling ahead of tariffs; confident in passing through OEM price increases; potential benefit to domestic repair volumes .
- MRO margin drivers: Paperless hangar rollout continuing; throughput gains driving margin expansion; Oklahoma expansion ahead of schedule, Miami slightly delayed .
- Landing Gear sale: Margins slightly accretive post-divestiture; Q3 included full results; Q4 assumes ~1 month contribution pre-close .
Estimates Context
- EPS beat: $0.99 vs $0.964*; margin expansion and mix (Trax, MRO) offset USM timing .
- Revenue miss: $678.2M vs $699.1M*; primarily USM volume timing at certain contracts .
- EBITDA: Consensus $79.2M* vs actual $77.4M*; company-reported adjusted EBITDA $81.2M indicates non-GAAP adjustments (e.g., legal reversal, acquisition/integration) supporting stronger underlying performance .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term: Expect modest top-line growth in Q4 with margin resilience (9.7%–9.9% guide); watch USM demand normalization and post-divestiture mix shift as potential upside catalysts .
- Medium-term margin runway: Trax scaling, MRO efficiency initiatives (paperless), capacity expansions, and Product Support synergies support continued margin expansion into FY26 .
- Portfolio discipline: Landing Gear sale cleanses lower-return activities; proceeds used to delever; net leverage down to 3.06x with target 2.0–2.5x over time .
- Parts Distribution growth: Exclusive OEM and PMA agreements (Unison, Chromalloy) and DLA programs drive durable, higher-margin distribution growth; key to sustained mix benefits .
- Estimate revisions: EPS likely nudged higher on margin outperformance; revenue forecasts may be trimmed near-term given USM variability, but improving asset availability supports recovery .
- Risk watch: Elevated interest expense persists; tariff volatility manageable but monitor pass-through; government USM adoption would be incremental upside not in current run-rate .
- Stock narrative: Margin expansion and deleveraging, plus software (Trax) optionality and distribution contracts, remain the primary positive catalysts; USM execution is the swing factor quarter-to-quarter .