Q3 2024 Earnings Summary
- Albemarle is implementing significant cost reductions, targeting $300 million to $400 million of cost and productivity improvements, including a further reduction of its global workforce by 6% to 7%, to maintain long-term competitiveness and financial flexibility.
- Despite market challenges, Albemarle delivered volumetric growth in energy storage and specialties, strong operating cash conversion of over 100%, and is maintaining its full-year 2024 outlook considerations.
- The company remains committed to its long-term strategy in the lithium market, focusing on high-return projects and maintaining flexibility to capitalize on future market upswings while adjusting its execution in response to market conditions.
- Albemarle is reducing capital expenditures by more than $800 million to $900 million in 2025, which may impact its long-term growth prospects and ability to capitalize on future opportunities.
- Persistent low lithium prices are pressuring Albemarle's revenues, and the company acknowledges that more supply needs to come out of the market to support price recovery, indicating potential challenges ahead.
- Albemarle is considering selling non-core assets like Ketjen, reflecting potential strategic shifts or financial pressures that may affect the company's future performance.
| Metric | YoY Change | Reason |
|---|---|---|
Total Revenue | -41% ( ) | The decline to $1,355 million was driven by lower lithium pricing in the Energy Storage segment (a core revenue contributor), as well as unfavorable market conditions suppressing demand for carbonate and hydroxide. Additionally, currency headwinds contributed to the shortfall. Longer term, management plans to optimize production and renegotiate prices to mitigate volatility. |
Energy Storage Segment | -55% ( ) | Sales declined to $767 million due to an 89% drop in pricing for lithium products, despite continued ramp-ups in production capacity. The segment has been greatly affected by soft market fundamentals and reduced equity earnings from joint ventures. Going forward, ALB intends to adjust its contract structures and continue scale-up of facilities to capture eventual market recoveries. |
Ketjen Segment | -6% ( ) | Revenue of $245 million was marginally lower due to slightly reduced pricing in clean fuel technologies, although higher sales volumes offered partial offset. The prior-year period also benefited from one-time insurance gains, creating a tough comparison. ALB expects continued product diversification and operational improvements to support future segment growth. |
Operating Income | - $1.109 billion vs. -$140 million ( ) | The substantial decline reflects asset write-offs (including the Kemerton Train 4 project), reduced gross profit from falling lithium prices, and increased financing costs. While SG&A expenses decreased, it could not offset the impact of major impairments and lower sales. The company aims to streamline capital projects and pursue strategic realignments to improve profitability. |
Net Income | - $1.069 billion vs. $264 million ( ) | Primarily impacted by steep revenue declines in Energy Storage, one-time project write-offs, and reduced equity income from JVs. The absence of the prior year’s legal accruals slightly lessened the drop, but overall results were still significantly negative. Management is focusing on cost-containment and refining capital allocations to restore net profitability. |
Diluted EPS | - $9.46 vs. $2.57 ( ) | The EPS decline stems from the same factors depressing net income—lower lithium pricing, asset impairments, and unfavorable market conditions—resulting in a net loss. Lower SG&A could not offset these pressures. Looking forward, ALB expects improved contract terms and potential market price recovery to help stabilize earnings. |
| Metric | Period | Previous Guidance | Current Guidance | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Lithium pricing scenario | FY 2024 | $15/kg scenario | Near the lower end of $12–$15/kg scenario | lowered |
Adjusted EBITDA | FY 2024 | Aligned with $12–$15/kg scenario, with potential upside | Expected to be in the middle of the $12–$15/kg scenario range | lowered |
Energy storage volume growth | FY 2024 | Higher end of 10%–20% | More than 20% | raised |
Operating cash flow conversion | FY 2024 | 50% | 50% | no change |
Fourth quarter volumes | Q4 2024 | No prior guidance | Down sequentially | no prior guidance |
Fourth quarter margins | Q4 2024 | No prior guidance | Slightly higher sequentially | no prior guidance |
Specialties and Ketjen segments | Q4 2024 | No prior guidance | Modest sequential improvements | no prior guidance |
-
2025 EBITDA Outlook
Q: Can you keep EBITDA flat if prices don't change?
A: Management is not providing a specific outlook for 2025 yet but noted several factors. Current market pricing is 20%–25% below the average achieved in 2024, suggesting a pricing headwind. Additionally, an unusual $100 million uplift from the Talison JV in Q2 won't repeat in 2025. On the positive side, fixed costs are expected to come down due to $300–$400 million in cost and productivity actions, with 40%–50% run rate savings expected by year-end. Plant ramp-ups, especially in lithium, will continue to improve fixed asset utilization in 2025. -
Impact of CapEx Cuts on Volume Growth
Q: How will CapEx cuts affect 2025 lithium volume growth?
A: CapEx reductions won't significantly impact 2025 volumes, as growth is driven by assets already built and ramping up, like the Salar yield improvement project, Meishan in China, and Kemerton in Australia. However, longer-term growth forecasts have been adjusted from a 20% CAGR through 2027 to approximately 15% due to CapEx cuts and volume reductions. -
CapEx Reductions and Long-Term Growth
Q: Are the reduced CapEx levels mainly maintenance capital, and could they go lower?
A: The reduced CapEx of $800–$900 million includes both maintenance capital and high-return projects. Maintenance capital is targeted at 4%–6% of revenue on a normalized basis, although it may be slightly higher next year due to below-normal pricing levels. The company will continue to assess opportunities, but future CapEx will depend on high-return projects and market conditions. -
Cash Conversion Outlook
Q: What's the outlook for cash conversion in the coming quarters?
A: Strong cash conversion in the recent quarter was aided by working capital management, but such levels aren't repeatable. Going forward, Albemarle is focused on cash generation and aims to reach free cash flow breakeven. Factors affecting cash conversion include working capital management, cost and productivity actions, and dividends from the Talison JV. Notably, Talison JV dividends are expected to be zero in Q4, which will lower cash conversion. -
Energy Storage Pricing and Mix Impact
Q: Did realized energy storage pricing decline due to contract changes?
A: There were no significant changes in contracts during the quarter. The apparent pricing decline is due to a shift in sales mix, including higher volumes of spot and spodumene sales, which affected average prices. Contracted volumes remain at about two-thirds of total sales, with some contracts having floors and ceilings. The mix effect should balance out on a full-year basis. -
Lithium Supply Reduction and Price Recovery
Q: Does supply need to decrease for lithium prices to recover?
A: Management believes both supply reduction and demand growth are necessary for price recovery. They expect more supply to exit the market if low prices persist, although it's uncertain how quickly this will happen. Demand remains strong, bolstered by fixed storage volumes exceeding expectations. -
Leverage Covenants and Limits Through 2026
Q: How will leverage covenant limits evolve through 2026?
A: The company has shaped covenant waivers based on trailing 12-month EBITDA, considering current and projected EBITDA patterns. Covenant limits rise to 5.75x in Q2 and Q3 of 2025, aligning with anticipated EBITDA trends. This approach provides a substantial buffer under the covenants. -
Cost Savings Range Explanation
Q: Why is there a wide range in the $300–$400 million cost savings target?
A: The range accounts for uncertainties in overhead reductions, operating cost improvements, and productivity actions at plants. The lower end is conservative, while the upper end is more aggressive, providing flexibility as the company works through these initiatives. -
Asset Sale Rumors and Clarifications
Q: Are you planning to sell stakes in Greenbushes or other assets?
A: Albemarle is always reviewing its portfolio but is not considering selling its stake in Greenbushes. Non-core assets like Ketjen are being considered for sale. The company clarified that rumors about selling Greenbushes are unfounded. -
Future Strategy Amid Price Recovery
Q: How will Albemarle's strategy change if lithium prices recover?
A: The company's strategy remains unchanged, but execution will adapt to market conditions. If prices recover, Albemarle will cautiously adjust its plans, ensuring that price improvements are sustainable before shifting strategy. The focus is on maintaining a cost structure that allows competitiveness through cycles while retaining flexibility to scale up if the market improves.
Research analysts covering ALBEMARLE.