Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Mark Finser

Lead Independent Director at Amalgamated Financial
Board

About Mark A. Finser

Age 65; independent director since May 2018. Founding member and Chair of New Resource Bank until AMAL acquired it in 2018; founder and former President/CEO of RSF Social Finance, later Chair of RSF’s Board of Trustees (assets grew to $120 million under his leadership). Currently Lead Independent Director at AMAL, empowered to call/preside over executive sessions of independent directors .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
RSF Social FinanceFounder; President & CEO; later Chairman of Board of TrusteesFounder (1984); CEO until 2007; Chair 2007–2018Grew RSF assets to $120M; pioneered social finance tools
New Resource BankFounding Member; ChairThrough acquisition by AMAL in 2018Led board until merger; contributed bank director experience
Independent trustee workIndependent trustee for families/multigenerational beneficiariesOngoingAligns financial resources with personal values

External Roles

OrganizationRole
B LabBoard service (member)
Living Lands TrustBoard service (member)
Gaia HerbsBoard service (member)

Board Governance

  • Independence: Board determined Finser is independent under Nasdaq standards (and “outside director” for applicable committees). Independent cohort average tenure ~4.3 years .
  • Lead Independent Director: Serves as LID with authority to call/preside over executive sessions of independent directors; role continues post-2025 annual meeting .
  • Current committee assignments (2024): Executive; Compensation & Human Resources; Nominating & Governance; Trust .
  • Post-annual meeting anticipated assignments (2025): Executive; Compensation & Human Resources; Nominating & Governance; Trust (unchanged) .
  • Attendance/Engagement: Board met 7 times in 2024; each director attended ≥75% of aggregate Board and committee meetings; all directors attended 2024 annual meeting .
  • Committee activity levels (2024): Audit (12), Compensation (9), Nominating & Governance (7), Credit Policy (7), Enterprise Risk Oversight (4), Trust (4); Executive Committee met 0 times .

Fixed Compensation

ComponentAmountNotes
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash (2024)$85,833Includes cash retainers for LID and committees
Stock Awards (RSUs, grant-date fair value)$50,0031,954 RSUs granted 5/22/2024 at $25.59; expected vest 5/22/2025
Total (2024)$135,836Sum of cash + stock fair value

Director compensation structure (policy):

  • Annual cash retainers: Board Chair $150,000; Lead Independent Director $70,000; other directors $50,000 .
  • Committee retainers: Audit member $10,000 (Chair +$15,000); Compensation/Enterprise Risk/Nominating/Credit/Trust members $5,000 (Chair +$10,000); Executive Committee members $5,000 .
  • Equity: Annual RSUs ~ $50,000 grant-date fair value; vest on first anniversary; dividend equivalents paid in cash upon vesting; forfeiture if director resigns before vest .

Performance Compensation

ItemDetail
Performance metrics tied to director payNone disclosed; director equity is time-based RSUs vesting after one year (no performance hurdles)

Other Directorships & Interlocks

Company/EntityPublic/Private/Non-profitRolePotential AMAL Conflict/Interlock
B LabNon-profitBoard memberNone disclosed
Living Lands TrustNon-profitBoard memberNone disclosed
Gaia HerbsPrivateBoard memberNone disclosed

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Social finance pioneer (RSF founder; scaled assets to $120M), strong mission-alignment experience, and bank board leadership (New Resource Bank Chair) .
  • Trusted advisor to high-net-worth families on aligning finance with values; governance experience across multiple mission-driven boards .

Equity Ownership

MetricAmountNotes
Beneficial ownership (common shares)16,521<1% of shares outstanding; includes RSUs vesting within 60 days
RSUs vesting within 60 days1,954Director annual grant (May 2024)
Stock options (exercisable/unexercisable)None disclosedOptions noted for other directors; Finser not listed
Ownership guidelines3× annual cash retainerCounts certain net shares/RSUs/options; measured annually; director must retain 50% of net shares until compliant
Hedging/pledgingCompany bans hedging & pledging practices within compensation philosophyReinforces alignment and compliance culture

Insider trades (Form 4):

  • Proxy does not list specific Form 4 transactions for Finser; company reported certain late Section 16 filings for other insiders in 2024 (names listed), Finser not among them .

Governance Assessment

  • Board effectiveness: Finser’s LID role strengthens independent oversight and executive-session leadership, counterbalancing a chair designated by Workers United under the Investor Rights Agreement .
  • Committee influence: As a member of Compensation and Nominating & Governance, Finser contributes to pay oversight, succession, independence determinations, and board composition; Compensation Committee uses independent consultant (Farient), assessed as conflict-free .
  • Independence & attendance: Independent status affirmed; strong engagement metrics (≥75% meeting attendance; full annual meeting participation) support investor confidence .
  • Compensation alignment: Director pay mix is balanced (cash retainers + time-based RSUs); no performance-linked director metrics, reducing risk of short-termism; stock ownership guidelines promote alignment .
  • Conflicts/related-party exposure: No Finser-specific related-party transactions disclosed; broader structural concentration exists via Workers United (chair designation, nomination rights, Trust Committee chair requirement), requiring vigilance; independent directors and committee structures partially mitigate this risk .
  • Shareholder signals: Prior say‑on‑pay approval at 98.5% indicates broad investor support for compensation governance (applies to NEOs but relevant to overall governance climate) .

RED FLAGS to monitor:

  • Structural influence of Workers United (e.g., right to designate Chair and multiple nominees; mandated Trust Committee chair) could challenge independence optics; continued robust LID function and independent committee leadership are essential mitigants .
  • Executive Committee inactivity (0 meetings in 2024) may be acceptable but warrants clarity on when this body is engaged for time‑sensitive oversight .