AE
Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 headline loss driven by non-cash items, while operating metrics improved: GAAP net loss of $21.0M (−$0.52 EPS) due to a $34.0M impairment; Adjusted EBITDA rose 7% q/q to $20.3M as LOE/boe fell 11% q/q to $19.67 and production grew to 19.7 Mboe/d .
- Portfolio simplification accelerated: AMPY agreed to divest all Oklahoma and East Texas assets for $220M total consideration; one deal closed in October with the rest expected in Q4, with proceeds earmarked to repay the $123M revolver and fund Beta development .
- Beta execution exceeded type curve: C08 delivered IP30 ≈ 550 bopd; C61 online in late October with promising early results; five D‑Sand wells to date are projected to generate >100% IRRs at $65 WTI, supporting 2026 acceleration post-divestitures .
- Guidance cadence: Company introduced Q4 capex of $8–$12M and reiterated expectations for lower LOE run‑rate (including ~$10M/yr savings at Bairoil), while maintaining FY25 framework from August; deleveraging plus Beta growth are key stock catalysts into 2026 .
- Estimates context: S&P Global consensus for Q3 2025 was unavailable; third‑party aggregator indicated revenue $67.7M and EPS $0.09 vs actual $66.4M and −$0.52, implying headline misses (note comparability and non-cash impairment) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Operating execution: Adjusted EBITDA rose to $20.3M (+7% q/q) on lower LOE/boe ($19.67, −11% q/q) despite weaker commodity prices; production increased to 19.7 Mboe/d (+0.6 q/q; +~10% adjusted for Eagle Ford sale) .
- Beta outperformance: C08 IP30 ≈ 550 bopd; five D‑Sand wells to date outperform the Beta type curve; management expects >100% IRRs at $65 WTI and ≈40% Beta production growth since early 2024 after offsetting base declines .
- Strategic clarity and cost actions: Announced $220M of asset sales to simplify portfolio and reduce G&A; Bairoil CO2 contract and plant project lower LOE run‑rate by ≈$10M/yr and cut power usage ~30% .
Management quotes:
- “We intend to simplify our portfolio, strengthen our balance sheet, and focus our resources on our assets with the highest potential upside opportunities.” — CEO Dan Furbee .
- “We are excited about the continued success we are having with our drilling program at Beta… and meaningful cost savings at Bairoil.” — CEO Dan Furbee .
-
What Went Wrong
- GAAP earnings impact: $34.0M impairment tied to marketed assets drove GAAP net loss of $21.0M (−$0.52 EPS) vs Q2 GAAP net income of $6.4M .
- Pricing/mix headwind: Unhedged revenue fell to $64.2M despite higher volumes as prices declined; liquids mix fell to 57% from 64% in Q2, reflecting higher East Texas gas volumes .
- Free cash flow timing: FCF was −$0.7M (vs −$10.1M in Q2) given front‑loaded 2025 capital spend (~85% by Q3), with GPT/boe up to $2.89 from $2.71 .
Financial Results
Segment production and LOE (Q2 → Q3):
- Production volumes (MBoe): Bairoil 286 → 280; Beta 355 → 357; Oklahoma 404 → 402; East TX/N. LA 584 → 768; Eagle Ford 111 → 4 .
- LOE ($M): Bairoil $14.0 → $13.0; Beta $13.4 → $14.0; Oklahoma $4.3 → $4.5; East TX/N. LA $5.7 → $4.2; Eagle Ford $1.2 → $(0.02) .
Actual vs third‑party consensus (Q3 2025):
- Revenue: $66.4M actual vs $67.7M consensus (MarketBeat) → small miss .
- EPS (GAAP): −$0.52 actual vs +$0.09 consensus (MarketBeat) → miss, driven by $34.0M impairment .
Note: S&P Global consensus was not available for Q3 2025.
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Note: A Q3 2025 earnings call transcript was not available; themes below reflect management commentary from Q1/Q2/Q3 press releases.
Management Commentary
- “We intend to simplify our portfolio, strengthen our balance sheet, and focus our resources on our assets with the highest potential upside opportunities.” — CEO Dan Furbee .
- “We are excited about the continued success we are having with our drilling program at Beta… meaningful cost savings at Bairoil, and… CCUS initiatives can further increase future cash flow.” — CEO Dan Furbee .
- “We expect all five [Beta D‑Sand] wells will generate IRRs greater than 100%, assuming $65 WTI oil prices.” — Company release .
Q&A Highlights
- Q3 2025 earnings call transcript was not available at the time of analysis; no Q&A details could be reviewed.
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus estimates for Q3 2025 were unavailable.
- Third‑party aggregator MarketBeat showed: Revenue consensus $67.70M; EPS consensus $0.09. Actuals were revenue $66.4M and GAAP EPS −$0.52, implying misses primarily due to a $34.0M impairment tied to asset marketing .
- Given non‑cash impairment and differing EPS bases (GAAP vs possible adjusted), we expect Street models to recalibrate for divestiture scope changes and lower LOE trajectory.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Deleveraging catalyst: Closing $220M of asset sales and applying proceeds to repay the $123M revolver materially reduces leverage and supports a 2026 Beta acceleration plan .
- Beta is the growth engine: Continued well outperformance and >100% IRR outlook at $65 WTI reinforce a focused, oil‑weighted development story post‑divestitures .
- Cost structure inflecting: LOE/boe down 11% q/q to $19.67 with ~$10M/yr Bairoil run‑rate savings, supporting higher margins even in softer price tapes .
- Mind the optics: Q3 GAAP loss and EPS miss were driven by a non‑cash $34M impairment; underlying Adjusted EBITDA improved and FCF trajectory is set to improve with lower Q4 capex and divestiture proceeds .
- Mix considerations: Liquids mix declined to 57% (from 64%) on East Texas gas contributions; divestitures and Beta growth should re‑tilt toward oil over time .
- Hedge support: Additional 2026–2027 oil swaps around ~$62 provide downside protection; overall hedge book remains robust .
- Near‑term positioning: Focus on deal closings, Q4 execution (pipeline upgrade, Beta facilities), and any borrowing base updates; shares should be sensitive to de‑risking of proceeds, Beta well results, and sustained LOE reduction .