AI
ANAPTYSBIO, INC (ANAB)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2024 delivered sharply higher collaboration revenue ($43.1M) and narrower net loss (-$21.8M; -$0.72 EPS) versus prior quarters, driven by Jemperli milestones and higher royalties; year-end cash/investments stood at $420.8M and runway extended through 2027 .
- Clinical execution was a highlight: rosnilimab Phase 2b RA achieved statistically significant primary and secondary endpoints and “highest ever” Week 14 responses; UC top-line was accelerated from Q1 2026 to Q4 2025, adding a nearer-term catalyst .
- Portfolio reshaping continued: ANB032 (BTLA) was discontinued after missing endpoints, and imsidolimab was out-licensed to Vanda ($10M upfront, $5M supply payment; milestones/royalties retained) .
- Street estimates from S&P Global for Q4 were unavailable*, so we cannot formally categorize beats/misses; nonetheless, revenue and EPS improved materially vs Q3 and Q2 .
- Stock-relevant catalysts: sustained RA efficacy through Week 28 expected in Q2 2025 and UC top-line in Q4 2025; extended cash runway supports execution without near-term financing overhang .
*Values retrieved from S&P Global (consensus data unavailable due to access limits).
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Rosnilimab RA Phase 2b met primary (mean change DAS28-CRP at Week 12) and key secondary endpoints; Week 14 showed “highest ever” ACR20/50/70 and CDAI LDA responses; management emphasized transformative potential to restore immune homeostasis in RA and UC .
- “Rosnilimab is safe and well tolerated with the highest ever reported CDAI low disease activity at ~3 months that, to date, is sustained and potentially deepening over 6 months… surpass our target product profile” — CEO Daniel Faga .
- UC timeline was pulled forward: top-line Phase 2 rosnilimab data moved up to Q4 2025, increasing nearer-term optionality and potential value inflection .
- Financials improved quarter-over-quarter with collaboration revenue up to $43.1M and net loss narrowing to $21.8M; cash/investments ended at $420.8M with runway extended through 2027, reducing financing risk .
What Went Wrong
- ANB032 (BTLA) in AD missed primary and secondary endpoints across all doses; program was discontinued, removing a prior near-term clinical catalyst .
- Non-cash interest expense tied to sale of future royalties increased ($17.4M in Q4), weighing on reported net loss despite better operating results .
- S&P Global consensus estimates for Q4 EPS/revenue were unavailable*, limiting formal beat/miss framing; investors must rely on sequential and YoY comparisons [GetEstimates error].
*Values retrieved from S&P Global (consensus data unavailable due to access limits).
Financial Results
Notes:
- Collaboration revenue growth in 2024 was primarily driven by Jemperli commercial milestones ($15M and $25M) and increased royalties; GSK reported Jemperli sales of $598.0M in 2024 vs $175.6M in 2023, including $190M in Q4 2024 .
Segment breakdown not applicable; ANAB reports collaboration revenue, not product segments.
Guidance Changes
No explicit revenue/margin/OpEx guidance was provided in Q4 materials.
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Note: A formal Q4 earnings call transcript was not available in our document catalog; management commentary reflects the Q4 press release and Feb 12 RA data call materials.
Management Commentary
- “With approximately $420 million of cash coming into 2025, we are well capitalized through year-end 2027, which does not include the significant potential residual royalties and milestones from our GSK financial collaboration.” — CEO Daniel Faga .
- “Rosnilimab’s transformative potential to restore immune homeostasis… not only in RA but also in other diseases like ulcerative colitis.” — CEO Daniel Faga .
- “Rosnilimab is safe and well tolerated with the highest ever reported CDAI low disease activity at ~3 months that, to date, is sustained and potentially deepening over 6 months… surpass our target product profile in the ~$20 billion U.S. RA market.” — CEO Daniel Faga .
Q&A Highlights
- A full Q4 earnings call transcript was not available in our catalog; however, company Q&A-style clarifications in Feb 12 RA materials emphasized: robust translational biomarkers (90% reduction in PD-1high T cells; ~50% CRP reduction), balanced safety (no malignancies/MACE; similar serious infections vs placebo), and sustained responses through Week 28 (blinded) to be detailed in Q2 2025 .
KPIs (Clinical Outcomes)
Safety (Week 12): No malignancies/MACE; low injection-site reactions; AEs broadly similar to placebo .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus estimates for Q4 2024 EPS and revenue were unavailable at the time of review due to access limitations; as a result, formal beat/miss comparisons cannot be provided*.
- Absent consensus, sequential comparisons show notable revenue growth and narrowing losses, supported by milestone/royalty revenue from GSK’s Jemperli .
*Values retrieved from S&P Global (consensus data unavailable due to access limits).
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Rosnilimab’s RA efficacy and safety profile, plus biomarker validation, strengthens the medium-term thesis; full six-month data in Q2 2025 is a pivotal catalyst .
- UC top-line acceleration to Q4 2025 expands the 2025 catalyst stack and broadens the potential label opportunity beyond RA .
- Collaboration revenue momentum tied to Jemperli milestones/royalties can provide non-dilutive funding tailwinds while development advances; watch GSK trial timelines (COSTAR Lung H1 2025; AZUR-1 in 2026) .
- Portfolio rationalization (ANB032 discontinued; imsidolimab out-licensed) focuses capital on higher-probability assets, aligning with extended runway through YE 2027 .
- Near-term trading setup: anticipate volatility around Q2 2025 RA six-month readout and any interim UC updates; positive durability/safety would be stock-supportive.
- Medium-term: if RA durability and UC efficacy confirm the immune homeostasis mechanism, program differentiation vs current RA classes could support partnering or later-stage investment decisions .
- Risk watch: royalty monetization non-cash interest expense impacts reported GAAP losses; clinical risks remain for UC and later-stage RA development; absence of product revenue keeps dependency on external milestones .