AC
APA Corp (APA)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- APA delivered a clean beat: adjusted EPS of $1.06 vs consensus $0.82, and total revenue of $2.64B vs $2.20B; adjusted EBITDAX was $1.49B. Strength came from Permian drilling efficiencies, Egypt gas outperformance, and profitable gas marketing activity . Estimates are from S&P Global.*
- Capital discipline accelerated: 2025 development capital cut by $150M and exploration reduced by $25M, while maintaining U.S. oil production guidance at 125–127 kbpd and lowering Permian rig count to 6 by end-Q2 .
- Cost-savings trajectory raised: in-year savings increased to $130M (from $60M) and the year-end 2025 run-rate target doubled to $225M, driven chiefly by ~$800K per-well Permian drilling cost reductions and overhead initiatives .
- Portfolio streamlining and deleveraging: announced $608M sale of New Mexico assets with proceeds earmarked primarily for debt reduction; dividend maintained at $0.25/share .
- Exploration optionality improved: Sockeye-2 Alaska well flowed ~2,700 bbl/d unstimulated, confirming superior reservoir quality and derisking broader prospectivity on APA’s 325k-acre position—potential medium-term catalyst as appraisal progresses .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Permian efficiency gains cut well costs by ~$800K per well; management expects to hold U.S. oil volumes flat with ~6 rigs, reducing capital intensity and protecting FCF in a volatile price environment .
- Egypt gas program outperformed: realized gas price was $3.19 in Q1, above guidance; management raised the trajectory with Q2 ~$3.40 and Q4 ~$3.80, supporting margin resilience .
- Alaska Sockeye-2 success: 25 ft net pay, ~20% porosity, 100–125 md permeability; 2,700 bbl/d unstimulated flow supports high-quality reservoir and improves optionality without near-term capital strain .
What Went Wrong
- LOE pressures: inflationary costs in compression and water disposal slowed near-term LOE savings; more meaningful reductions expected later in 2025 and into 2026 .
- U.S. gas/NGL curtailments: APA curtailed ~8 MMcf/d of gas and ~500 bbl/d of NGLs in Q1 due to weak/negative Waha pricing (not contemplated in prior guidance) .
- Egypt gross oil volumes: continued slight decline expected through 2025; Q1 decline was somewhat more than “slight” due to downtime, though condensate-rich gas and waterflood programs mitigate oil declines .
Financial Results
Income Statement Summary
Margins (computed from company-reported figures)
Note: EBITDAX margin = Adjusted EBITDAX / Total Revenues using company-reported figures and .
Actual vs S&P Global Consensus – Q1 2025
Values with asterisk retrieved from S&P Global.
Production by Geography (BOE/day)
KPIs and Cash Metrics
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We delivered strong first quarter results with in-line production and lower capital investment relative to guidance… Capital came in below guidance largely due to significant improvements in drilling performance.” – CEO John Christmann .
- “We have captured an impressive $800,000 in cost savings per well in the Permian… slim hole drilling, modifying casing designs and fit-for-purpose directional tools have considerably shortened drilling durations.” – President/CFO Steve Riney .
- “We intend to allocate most of the proceeds from this divestiture toward debt reduction… a full exit from New Mexico, allowing us to focus solely on the Texas side of the basin.” – CEO John Christmann .
- “The Sockeye-2 well… averaged 2,700 barrels of oil per day… the flow test indicates significantly higher reservoir quality compared to similar topset discoveries to the west.” – APA press release .
Q&A Highlights
- Cost-savings cadence: Management lifted in-year savings to $130M and YE25 run-rate to $225M, with potential for the longer-term $350M target to rise as efficiencies accrue; majority of savings now coming from capital (Permian) .
- Permian rig program: Confidence to hold 125–127 kbpd with 6 rigs (down from 8), anticipating further efficiency gains into 2026 .
- Alaska optionality and funding: High-quality Sockeye-2 reservoir derisks the play; Suriname’s timing precedes any meaningful Alaska capital, reducing funding stress; appraisal strategy will be measured .
- LOE roadmap: Near-term inflation in compression and water disposal; plan includes commercial renegotiations, workflow simplification, and route optimization; more progress expected later in 2025/2026 .
- Capital breakevens and shareholder returns: With $350M run-rate savings, APA can fund base program and dividend at ~$50 WTI; buybacks remain opportunistic given deleveraging from asset sale .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 beat: Adjusted EPS $1.06 vs $0.82 consensus; revenue $2.64B vs $2.20B; EBITDA $1.42B vs $1.35B; beats driven by Permian well-cost reductions, stronger Egypt gas realizations, and locked-in basis spreads supporting marketing income . Consensus figures from S&P Global.*
- Near-term estimates likely rise for EBITDA and EPS on reduced development capital, higher marketing income ($575M guide), and upward trajectory in Egypt gas price realizations .
Values with asterisk retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Bold beat on Q1 revenue/EPS with improving capital efficiency; Permian rig count reduction with flat oil volumes is a major structural positive for FCF .
- Cost-savings acceleration (in-year $130M; YE25 run-rate $225M) should lower breakevens and enhance resilience through commodity cycles .
- Egypt gas pricing and volume trajectory supports margin stability, with Q4 realized gas expected near ~$3.80/Mcf; marketing basis hedges lock-in substantial 2025 income .
- Portfolio high-grading continues: $608M New Mexico sale simplifies Permian footprint and aids deleveraging; dividend maintained .
- Exploration catalysts: Alaska Sockeye-2 flow test confirms superior reservoir quality; Suriname development remains on track for 2028 first oil .
- Watch near-term LOE pressures (compression/water); savings likely back-half weighted; expect incremental clarity on Permian inventory density as costs fall .
- Trading stance: Positive skew on execution/cost trajectory and gas marketing income; oil price downside mitigated by gas-focused Egypt program and portfolio flexibility; monitor WTI in low-50s as potential trigger for deeper activity cuts .