Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
- Robust Leasing Activity: The executives noted ongoing discussions with multiple hyperscalers and consistent leasing interest across various campuses, underpinning a strong demand for data center capacity and signaling robust future revenue potential.
- Cloud Business Upside: The resolution of technical issues in transitioning GPU clusters to an on-demand model is expected to unlock higher pricing and scalability, supporting improved revenue as the on-demand segment ramps up.
- Scalable Campus Expansion: The planned phased development of the Ellendale campus—with an initial 400 MW capacity and potential to grow further—demonstrates a strong strategic growth path and attractive long-term outlook.
- Contract Nonrenewal Risk: Bitcoin hosting contracts are set to expire in roughly 2 years, leaving the possibility of nonrenewal that could negatively impact future revenue.
- Technical Transition Challenges: The move from a single-tenant to a multi-tenant configuration for GPU clusters has already experienced technical issues, indicating potential for further disruptions as the on-demand model ramps up.
- Uncertainty in Cloud Business Divestiture: Early-stage discussions about the potential sale of the cloud business, coupled with indications of competitive friction from hyperscalers, could introduce strategic uncertainty and execution risks.
Metric | YoY Change | Reason |
---|---|---|
Total Revenue | +22% (from $43,349K to $52,921K) | Total Revenue increased by 22% YoY, driven by the continued expansion of revenue streams—likely enhanced by improved customer uptake and higher utilization of revenue-generating facilities—consistent with the prior period’s growth trends. |
Operating Loss | 66% reduction (loss decreased from $55,820K to $18,943K) | Operating Loss improved drastically by 66%, reflecting better cost management and operational efficiencies. This improvement builds on previous enhancements in cloud services and facility utilization, reducing fixed overheads relative to revenue increases seen in the prior year. |
Net Loss | 43% improvement (decreased from $62,838K to $35,555K) | Net Loss declined by 43% YoY, indicating more effective expense control and margin improvement even as revenue grew. The improvement suggests that initiatives implemented in the previous period have continued to bear fruit in lowering overall losses. |
Interest Expense, Net |
| Interest Expense more than doubled, rising by over 100% due to increased finance leases and borrowing. This increment reflects the company's expanded capital activities and higher debt obligations compared to the prior period. |
Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Share | Improved from ($0.56) to ($0.13) | Net Loss Per Share improved significantly, a result of the reduced overall net loss combined with dilution from a higher weighted average share count. This change indicates better performance on a per-share basis compared to the previous period. |
Operating Cash Flow | 85% decline (from $38,840K to $5,897K) | Operating Cash Flow dropped approximately 85% YoY, reflecting a swing from strong inflows in the previous period to much lower inflows now. This decline is primarily driven by reduced revenue prepayments and increased payments for operating leases, which have altered the working capital dynamics relative to the prior period. |
Metric | Period | Previous Guidance | Current Guidance | Change |
---|---|---|---|---|
First Building Revenue Generation | Q3 2025 | no prior guidance | Calendar Q4 2025 | no prior guidance |
Capital Expenditure (CapEx) | Q3 2025 | no prior guidance | $30 million to $50 million a month | no prior guidance |
Cloud Services Business Annual Revenue | Q3 2025 | no prior guidance | $110 million to $120 million annual business | no prior guidance |
Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
---|---|---|---|
Leasing Agreements | Q4 2024, Q1 2025, and Q2 2025 discussions highlighted a strong LOI with hyperscalers, high demand for data center capacity, extended exclusivity periods (or their expiration), and delays inherent in first‐time supplier engagements ( in Q4; in Q1; in Q2). | Q3 2025 emphasized persistent robust demand and ongoing delays in securing leases at the Ellendale campus—along with an improved pricing trend ( , ). | Consistent strong demand with ongoing execution delays but improved pricing sentiment. |
Data Center Capacity Expansion | Across Q4 2024, Q1 2025, and Q2 2025, the focus was on the Ellendale campus development and external pipelines. Earlier calls described the initial 100‑megawatt facility, expansion to 400 megawatts, and robust external pipelines (e.g. 1.4–1.6 gigawatts) ( in Q4; in Q1; in Q2). | In Q3 2025, the messaging remains optimistic with confirmed on‐schedule construction for the first building, clear expansion plans (including subsequent buildings), and continued aggressive pursuit of external pipeline opportunities ( ). | Steady and disciplined expansion with continued investment and broad capacity pipelines. |
Cloud Business Performance & Strategic Direction | Q4 2024 to Q2 2025 highlighted steady revenue growth—from about $16.8 million in Q4 to $25.9–$27.7 million in Q1–Q2—with a focus on enterprise markets and a consistent operating model ( ). | Q3 2025 saw a drop in revenue to $17.8 million driven by the shift from reserve to on‑demand models, along with discussions on reviewing strategic options including potential divestiture ( ). | A shift in operating model is emerging, with technical and strategic challenges leading to potential divestiture considerations. |
GPU Cluster Deployment & Technical Transition | Q1 2025 was notable for its explicit mention of next‑generation (‘Blackwell’) considerations and preparations for cluster rollouts ( ), while Q2 2025 and Q4 2024 focused more on cluster numbers and financing, without next‑gen specifics ( ; ). | In Q3 2025, the discussion centers on resolving technical challenges from shifting to an on‑demand model, with no further mention of 'Blackwell' ( ). | Initial focus on next‑generation technology has decreased as technical transition hurdles are overcome. |
Financing Structures, Capital Expenditure & Cost‑of‑Capital | Earlier periods emphasized proactive approaches: Q4 2024 noted asset‑level GPU financing structures and cost pressures ( ); Q1 2025 detailed lease financing amendments and site‑level debt expectations ( ); and Q2 2025 stressed strategic partnerships with Macquarie and convertible note offerings ( ). | Q3 2025 reports the issuance of a $450 million convertible note and attractive financing arrangements with partners like Macquarie and SMBC, aimed at mitigating high CapEx and cost‑of‑capital pressures ( ). | A consistent focus on strategic financing is evident, with evolving structures to lower cost‐of‐capital and support a CapEx‑heavy model. |
Competitive Landscape & Market Pressures | Q4 2024 provided detailed insights on competition—from established private data center builders, power bottlenecks, and supply chain challenges ( ). Earlier Q1 and Q2 discussions were less explicit. | In Q3 2025, the narrative shifts to discussing demand rotation among hyperscalers and even hints at converting to a data center REIT to mitigate market pressures ( ). | An increased focus on market pressures appears as competitive dynamics prompt consideration of strategic restructuring. |
Contractual Risks from Nonrenewal | There is little to no discussion in Q4 2024, Q1 2025, and Q2 2025 regarding contractual risks from nonrenewal, including Bitcoin hosting contracts. | Q3 2025 introduces this topic, noting that Bitcoin hosting contracts at Ellendale and Jamestown have roughly two years remaining and that the company does not anticipate nonrenewal issues ( ). | A new topic emerges with limited risk, indicating proactive risk monitoring in a non‑core area. |
Emerging AI Cloud Business Capacity | Q4 2024 mentioned ready deployment (over 30 MW available) and early online clusters; Q1 2025 discussed having 6 GPU clusters online and plans for additional clusters; Q2 2025 reinforced steady growth in cluster deployment ( in Q4; in Q1; in Q2). | Q3 2025 focuses on transitioning GPU clusters from reserve to on‑demand, resolving earlier technical challenges, and expects a ramp‑up in deployment activity ( ). | Consistent expansion is evident, with evolving deployment models to adapt to market demands and technological transitions. |
-
Cloud Sale
Q: When is cloud sale expected?
A: Management indicated that the process for the cloud business sale is just beginning and various structures are under evaluation with no clear timeline yet. -
Business Split
Q: What is the on-demand split?
A: Four of the six GPU clusters remain under reserve contracts while two have shifted to an on-demand model, generating modest revenue after recent technical adjustments. -
CapEx Outlook
Q: What are near-term CapEx needs?
A: The company is on track with past projections, spending roughly $30–50 million per month on the first building, with potential tariff impacts monitored. -
Facility Completion
Q: How is Ellendale progressing?
A: The Ellendale facility is nearing completion with final touches such as generator setup and cabling underway, IT equipment starting to land by July–August and expected service beginning in October. -
Bitcoin Contracts
Q: When do BTC contracts expire?
A: Bitcoin hosting contracts at Ellendale and Jamestown have about 2 years remaining, and management does not foresee significant nonrenewal risk. -
Technical Resolution
Q: Has the GPU technical issue been fixed?
A: Yes, the technical issues from transitioning to a multi-tenant model were resolved by early March, which should support a smooth ramp-up in the next quarter. -
Pricing Stability
Q: What are current HPC pricing trends?
A: Pricing has been stable over the past 90 days with a year-over-year increase, maintaining positive lease expectations. -
AI Lease Terms
Q: How long are the AI cloud leases?
A: Leases typically run for 5–7 years with extension options, covering the core GPU assets and associated software. -
Bitcoin REIT Fit
Q: How does BTC hosting align with REIT plans?
A: Management views BTC hosting as complementary to HPC capacity in a REIT structure, efficiently utilizing unused power capacity. -
Sale Process Terms
Q: Do lessors demand definitive sale terms?
A: Lessors are flexible and do not insist on a definitive agreement, supporting the process of separating the cloud business. -
Hyperscaler Demand
Q: Has hyperscaler build demand changed?
A: Demand among hyperscalers is rotating among a few key players, yet overall interest remains stable to increased, reflecting normal market dynamics.
Research analysts covering Applied Digital.