Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

AR

ARK RESTAURANTS CORP (ARKR)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 2025 delivered $43.72M revenue and $(0.96) diluted EPS, down year over year primarily on Bryant Park litigation costs (~$0.8M), Washington D.C. demand weakness, and a $4.70M impairment at Sequoia; adjusted EBITDA was $1.79M .
  • Same-store sales ex-closed units fell 7.4% in the quarter, with Bryant Park event business negatively impacted by landlord dispute publicity; Las Vegas cash flow improved despite broader Strip softness .
  • Balance sheet remains resilient: cash $12.33M and debt $3.86M at quarter-end; credit facility maturity extended to June 1, 2028, with covenants revised and net income covenant removed .
  • No formal forward guidance; management focus centers on litigating to retain Bryant Park leases, mitigating D.C. softness, and opportunistic growth; Q3 call featured no Q&A, keeping catalysts concentrated on legal outcomes and operating execution .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Las Vegas operations increased cash flow despite Strip softness; Robert (NYC) and Rustic Inn (FL) performing better than last year, with “the rest of our portfolio restaurants continue to meet expectations” .
  • Liquidity/financing de-risked: credit facility extended to 2028; minimum net worth covenant raised; net income covenant removed, preserving flexibility .
  • Adjusted EBITDA remained positive at $1.79M despite headwinds; cash held at $12.33M provides support for growth initiatives .

What Went Wrong

  • Bryant Park litigation drove ~$0.8M expense and damaged catering/a la carte demand, causing SSS to decline 7.4% in Q3; management cites “negative publicity” impact .
  • Sequoia (Washington D.C.) saw additional $4.70M impairment as future cash flow projections no longer support carrying values; D.C. market demand described as difficult .
  • Year-over-year revenue fell to $43.72M vs $50.40M, and net income swung to $(3.45)M vs $0.64M, reflecting litigation costs and impairments, plus removal of Tampa Food Court and El Rio Grande revenue contributions .

Financial Results

MetricQ3 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Revenue ($USD Millions)$50.40 $44.99 $39.73 $43.72
Diluted EPS ($USD)$0.18 $0.88 $(2.57) $(0.96)
Operating Income ($USD Millions)$0.82 $5.69 $(4.62) $(3.42)
Net Income ($USD Millions)$0.64 $3.16 $(9.26) $(3.45)
Adjusted EBITDA ($USD Millions)$3.38 $1.38 $(0.69) $1.79

Notes:

  • Q/Q: Revenue improved vs Q2 ($43.72M vs $39.73M) while losses narrowed (EPS $(0.96) vs $(2.57)) as litigation expense persisted but goodwill impairment was concentrated in Q2 .
  • Y/Y: Revenue down ~13%, EPS down from $0.18 to $(0.96), reflecting Bryant Park event business softness and Sequoia impairment .

Balance Sheet Snapshot

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Cash and Equivalents ($USD Millions)$13.10 $11.12 $12.33
Total Outstanding Debt ($USD Millions)$4.70 $4.28 $3.86

Segment/Contribution Snapshot (YTD)

Item39 Weeks Ended Jun 29, 202439 Weeks Ended Jun 28, 2025
Bryant Park Grill & Café + The Porch revenue ($USD Millions)$23.3 (16.7% of total) $19.7 (15.4% of total)

KPIs and Non-GAAP Adjustments

KPI / ItemQ3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025
Company-wide SSS ex El Rio Grande/Tampa Food Court-7.4% (13 weeks) +0.4% (13 weeks) -2.3% (13 weeks)
Litigation expense (Bryant Park)>$0.80M (quarter) ~$0.65M (consulting/legal impact on EBITDA narrative)
Impairment – Sequoia ROU + long-lived assets$4.70M (quarter)
Goodwill impairment$3.44M (YTD, recorded in Q2 period) $3.44M
Adjusted EBITDA$1.79M $(0.69)M $1.38M

Guidance Changes

No quantitative forward guidance was provided. Financing and covenant changes materially updated:

MetricPeriodPrevious Guidance/TermsCurrent Guidance/TermsChange
Credit Agreement maturityFacilityJune 1, 2025June 1, 2028Extended
Max permitted obligationsFacility$30.0M$20.0M (incl. promissory notes)Lowered
Minimum tangible net worth covenantFacility$22.0M$28.0MRaised
Annual net income covenantFacilityRequiredRemovedRemoved

Dividend/Buyback posture noted previously as contingent on Bryant Park lease outcome (Q1 call), not formal guidance .

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 2025)Previous Mentions (Q2 2025)Current Period (Q3 2025)Trend
Bryant Park leases/litigationLandlord selected a new operator; outcome uncertain; capital allocation constrained by lease uncertainty Holdover tenant; filed suit; injunction denied; appeal pending; 26-week revenue contribution 15.0% Litigation ongoing; discovery beginning; Q3 event demand pressured; 39-week contribution 15.4% Intensifying legal process; operational headwind continues
Washington D.C. demand (Sequoia)Operational efforts; market weakness noted Impairment $4.70M; event business dried up; market difficult Worsened
Las Vegas performanceOperational efficiency improving; cash flows ahead of projections Cash flow increased despite Strip softness Improving execution vs macro softness
Capital structure/liquidityCash $13.10M; debt $4.70M In process of renewing credit facility Facility extended; debt $3.86M; cash $12.33M De-risked
Macro demand/SSSSSS -2.3% (Q1) SSS +0.4% (Q2) SSS -7.4% (Q3) Volatile; Q3 worsened
Meadowlands casino licenseStrategic optionality tied to NY downstate licensing Strategic optionality reiterated Belief closer to NJ referendum trigger post NY licenses Monitoring (potential upside catalyst)
Dividend/buyback postureDependent on Bryant Park outcome Unchanged dependency

Management Commentary

  • “The current quarter showed positive EBITDA of $1,791,000… due in large part to the expense of our ongoing litigation involving our Bryant Park operations which exceeded $800,000 in the quarter.” – Michael Weinstein, CEO .
  • “Our operations at the New York-New York Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas increased cash flow despite softness on the Las Vegas Strip.” – Michael Weinstein .
  • “We recognized additional impairment charges of $2,940,000 and $1,760,000 during the 13 weeks ended June 28, 2025 related to Sequoia’s ROU and long-lived assets, respectively.” – Company disclosure .
  • “We did extend our credit agreement during the quarter through… 2028 with $20,000,000 of capacity… and removed the annual net income covenant.” – Anthony Sirica, CFO .

Q&A Highlights

  • No analyst questions on the Q3 call; management reiterated focus on Bryant Park litigation, operating performance, and Meadowlands optionality .

Estimates Context

  • S&P Global consensus for Q3 2025 appears unavailable for EPS and revenue (no estimates and counts returned). As a result, no beat/miss vs Street can be determined; investors should note low/limited coverage for ARKR. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Near-term results are dominated by Bryant Park lease litigation: expect continued event/catering pressure and legal costs until resolution; stock sensitivity to legal updates is high .
  • Operational resilience: Las Vegas, Robert (NYC), and Rustic Inn (FL) offset some headwinds; focus on efficiency/cash flow remains a mitigating factor .
  • Impairment risk persists in weaker markets (Washington D.C.); monitoring future performance at Sequoia and potential further impairments is prudent .
  • Liquidity and covenants are favorable post credit facility extension, reducing financing risk and supporting selective growth initiatives .
  • Quarterly SSS volatility suggests macro sensitivity and venue-specific issues; traders should watch Q4 seasonality and Bryant Park event calendar normalization .
  • With no formal guidance and minimal Street coverage, price action likely tied to legal milestones (injunctions/appeals), operational updates from Las Vegas/NYC, and any Meadowlands progress .
  • Capital allocation (dividends/buybacks) remains on hold pending Bryant Park lease outcome; medium-term thesis hinges on lease retention and stabilization of D.C. .