AR
ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP (ARLP)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 revenue was $547.5M and EPS $0.46; Adjusted EBITDA $161.9M. Versus Q2 2024, revenue declined 7.7% and EPS fell from $0.77; sequentially, revenue rose 1.3% while EPS decreased due to a $25.0M impairment and higher depreciation .
- Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) expected $583.9M revenue and $0.61 EPS; ARLP missed both, driven by lower realized coal pricing and the impairment; Adjusted EBITDA was roughly in line with consensus* .
- Guidance mix shifted: Illinois Basin coal sales volumes were raised; Appalachia volumes lowered due to Tunnel Ridge issues and a customer default; oil & gas BOE volume guidance midpoint increased ~5%; total coal price guidance for Appalachia lifted, and total cost per ton guidance reduced .
- Capital allocation pivot: quarterly distribution reduced to $0.60 from $0.70 to strengthen balance sheet and increase flexibility amid supportive regulatory developments and contracting momentum—likely a near-term stock reaction catalyst for yield recalibration and debate on growth optionality .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Illinois Basin execution: tons sold +15.2% YoY; segment Adjusted EBITDA expense/ton -7.1% YoY on lower maintenance and improved recoveries; monthly shipping records at Hamilton and River View in June .
- Contracting momentum: added 17.4M committed and priced sales tons for 2025–2029 (incl. 1.1M option tons), bringing YTD new commitments to 35.1M tons since January .
- Royalty volumes strength: Oil & Gas BOE +7.7% YoY; coal royalty tons +10.4% YoY; total Royalties Segment Adjusted EBITDA grew sequentially .
“Coal shipments of 8.4 million tons were up 6.8% YoY and up 7.9% sequentially…Hamilton and River View mines achieving monthly shipping records in June” — CEO Joe Craft .
What Went Wrong
- Pricing headwind and impairment: coal sales price/ton down 11.3% YoY; non‑cash $25.0M impairment on a battery materials investment; higher D&A impacted EPS .
- Appalachia underperformance: tons sold -16.8% YoY; Segment Adjusted EBITDA -35.1% YoY; mining challenges at Tunnel Ridge persisted (albeit with expected improvement post longwall move) .
- Distribution coverage compressed: DCF of $90.7M vs distributions paid $90.7M (1.00x coverage) even as free cash flow remained positive; hence distribution reset to $0.60 to prioritize flexibility .
Financial Results
Headline metrics vs prior periods and estimates
Consensus vs actual (Q2 2025)
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment breakdown (Coal)
KPIs and Royalties
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “All operations performed well during the quarter, with the exception of Tunnel Ridge…outlook…improved following the recent completion of a longwall move…higher productivity rates and higher in‑seam yields going forward” — Joe Craft, CEO .
- “We committed an additional 17.4 million tons…bringing total new commitments secured this year to 35.1 million tons” — Joe Craft .
- “We are seeing the most encouraging outlook for domestic coal since early 2023, supported by the most favorable regulatory environment in decades…distribution reflects a proactive step to strengthen our balance sheet and increase financial flexibility” — Joe Craft .
- “Segment adjusted EBITDA expense per ton…decrease…driven by lower maintenance…improved recoveries at River View and Hamilton” — Cary Marshall, CFO .
Q&A Highlights
- Distribution reset rationale: management emphasized sustainability, flexibility for growth (e.g., data center energy infrastructure, minerals, Gavin Power Plant fund), and stronger after‑tax yields under OBBBA—no immediate deployment announced .
- 2026 sales visibility: 97% committed for 2025 and 80% for 2026 (up from 61%); potential +0.75–1.0MM tons capacity recovery at Tunnel Ridge; optional 1.0MM+ in IL Basin if markets warrant .
- Export dynamics: high‑sulfur netbacks remain inferior to domestic; will flex to domestic unless pricing improves; some stabilization and inquiries emerging .
- Inventory and demand: utilities near equilibrium; purchases aligning with burns vs pile draws; favorable natural gas curve supports coal consumption .
- Royalties capital allocation: focus on Permian/Delaware; disciplined underwriting; competitive market anticipated with ample auction opportunities .
Estimates Context
- Q2 2025 reported revenue $547.5M vs S&P Global consensus $583.9M* (miss); EPS $0.46 vs $0.61* (miss). Adjusted EBITDA $161.9M was close to EBITDA consensus of $168.6M* .
- Drivers of variance: lower realized coal pricing (total coal price/ton $57.92, -11.3% YoY), reduced transportation revenues, and a $25.0M non‑cash impairment; partially offset by higher volumes and +$12.9M change in fair value of digital assets .
- Implication: Street models likely to reduce Appalachia volumes and price/mix assumptions and reflect a lower distribution rate; cost/ton improvements and increased IL Basin volumes support margin stability in 2H .
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Volume resilience with cost discipline: IL Basin led performance; total tons sold +6.8% YoY; cost per ton improving, supporting stable coal margins despite lower pricing .
- Appalachia recovery in 2H: Tunnel Ridge’s longwall move and better geology expected to lower costs and lift productivity—monitor quarterly cadence .
- Strong contracting and book visibility: 35.1M YTD commitments; 2025 ~97% committed and 2026 ~80% committed—reduces near‑term price/volume uncertainty .
- Capital flexibility and distribution reset: $0.60 quarterly distribution and 1.00x Q2 coverage prioritize optionality for growth (e.g., energy infrastructure, minerals) and de‑risk payout amid policy shifts .
- Policy tailwinds: OBBBA and executive orders bolster baseload generation and data center electrification—constructive for domestic coal demand and pricing stability .
- Royalty segment steady growth: BOE volumes up and guidance raised; expense ~14% of revenue—accretive, capital‑light growth vector .
- Watch list: export market netbacks (potential upside), coal price realization trajectory, execution at Tunnel Ridge/Hamilton, and any announced capital deployments (e.g., power assets/data center infrastructure) .