ASSOCIATED BANC-CORP (ASB)·Q2 2017 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2017 delivered net income available to common equity of $56 million and diluted EPS of $0.36, up 16% year over year; net interest income rose to $184 million and net interest margin held at 2.83% .
- Balance sheet growth was driven by residential mortgage retention and solid commercial lending; average loans rose $449 million sequentially and $880 million year over year to $20.5B, while average deposits increased $1.2B YoY to $21.5B .
- Credit quality improved: nonaccrual loans fell to $232 million (1.12% of total loans) and potential problem loans declined to $263 million, both down materially vs prior year; effective tax rate decreased to 26% due to a reserve release from a favorable state tax court ruling .
- Strategic catalyst: ASB announced the all-stock acquisition of Bank Mutual (~$482M value), expected to be EPS accretive in 2019 with <1% tangible book value dilution at closing—supporting scale, branch density and efficiency improvements .
- EPS was in line with consensus per Zacks/Nasdaq reporting; S&P Global consensus data was unavailable for this request .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- “Robust loan growth and improving fee-based income trends” with residential mortgage retention strategy driving most loan growth; card-based, trust, brokerage and annuity fees supported bottom-line expansion .
- Net interest income increased 4% YoY (to $184M) with loan yields up 27 bps YoY; CET1 ratio of 9.9% and return on average CET1 improved to 10.6% .
- Credit metrics improved: nonaccrual loans down 18% YoY to $232M; potential problem loans down 43% YoY to $263M; oil & gas allowance at $33M (5.4% of O&G loans) indicating disciplined risk management .
-
What Went Wrong
- Elevated interest expense: cost of interest-bearing deposits rose 20 bps YoY to 0.51%, and total interest expense jumped 70% YoY, compressing NII growth sequentially .
- Noninterest expense increased 1% YoY to $176M, with personnel (+$3M) and technology (+$1M) costs higher; efficiency ratio (FTE) rose vs Q1 to 65.21% .
- Net charge-offs increased sequentially to $12.6M (25 bps of average loans), driven by commercial and industrial, though still below year-ago levels .
Financial Results
Noninterest Income Breakdown ($USD Millions)
Key KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Note: The Q2 2017 earnings call transcript could not be retrieved due to a document database inconsistency; thematic tracking uses press release and investor presentation disclosures.
Management Commentary
- “Robust loan growth and improving fee-based income trends drove this quarter’s results… Disciplined expense controls combined with improving credit trends rounded out the quarter. We remain on track to deliver on our full year guidance.” — Philip B. Flynn, President & CEO .
- Outlook emphasized “mid-to-high single digit annual average loan growth,” maintaining loan-to-deposit ratio under 100%, improving NIM trend, and continued efficiency ratio improvement .
Q&A Highlights
- The Q2 2017 earnings call transcript was unavailable due to a retrieval error in the document database. No Q&A excerpts or clarifications can be cited from the call at this time.
Estimates Context
- EPS vs consensus: ASB reported $0.36 diluted EPS; public sources indicate EPS was in line with Zacks consensus for Q2 2017 .
- S&P Global (Capital IQ) consensus estimates were unavailable for this request due to a provider limit error; therefore, estimate comparisons rely on publicly reported consensus from Zacks/Nasdaq for EPS, and revenue consensus was not available.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Residential mortgage retention strategy is a core growth engine; average loans and yields are rising, supporting net interest income resilience even as deposit costs climb .
- Fee income mix is strengthening (card-based, trust, brokerage), helping offset expected declines in mortgage banking revenue through the year .
- Credit normalization is favorable: nonaccruals, potential problem loans, and O&G risk are all lower YoY; allowance coverage remains solid at 1.35% of loans .
- The Bank Mutual acquisition is a notable strategic catalyst, enhancing Wisconsin density, core deposits, and efficiency; management targets EPS accretion in 2019 and minimal TBV dilution at close—supportive for medium-term multiple expansion if integration executes as planned .
- Near term, rising funding costs pressure NII growth vs asset yield gains; watch deposit mix and pricing discipline as rates move to preserve NIM trajectory .
- Expense control remains key: personnel and technology investments are elevating run-rate costs; execution against the efficiency ratio improvement plan is a critical KPI to monitor .
- With EPS in line and improving credit, stock performance likely hinges on integration updates and evidence of NIM improvement and fee momentum; the narrative is constructive but requires delivery against 2017 outlook .
Additional Data and Trend Tables
Loans and Deposits (Period End, $USD Millions)
Asset Quality Highlights
Non-GAAP Measures (FTE Efficiency Ratio, Fee-Based Revenue)
Notes: Efficiency ratio definitions and reconciliations are provided by management; FTE adjusts NII for tax-equivalent basis; “fee-based revenue” is non-GAAP (sum of trust service fees, service charges, card-based fees, insurance commissions, and brokerage & annuity commissions) .
Prior Quarters’ Earnings Materials
- Q1 2017 results (EPS $0.35 diluted; NII $180.3M; noninterest income $79.8M; NIM 2.84%) are shown in the quarterly trend tables above .
- Q4 2016 results (EPS $0.34 diluted; NII $180.0M; noninterest income $92.3M; NIM 2.80%) are shown in the quarterly trend tables above .
Other Relevant Q2 2017 Press Releases
- “Associated Banc-Corp to acquire Bank Mutual Corporation” joint press release (transaction terms, strategic/financial rationale, EPS accretion expectation, TBV dilution <1% at closing) .
- ASB’s Q2 2017 press release hosted on investor site confirms the headline results and summary trends .
S&P Global consensus data was unavailable for this request; EPS consensus references rely on publicly reported Zacks/Nasdaq sources.