AC
AerSale Corp (ASLE)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 revenue was $71.2M and adjusted diluted EPS was $0.04; results reflected zero flight equipment (aircraft/engine) sales in the quarter, while underlying USM/leasing/engineered products drove 18.5% YoY growth ex-whole assets . Versus S&P Global consensus, AerSale materially missed on revenue ($71.2M vs $93.9M consensus*) and EPS ($0.04 vs $0.18 consensus*), as estimates embedded whole-asset sales that did not occur this quarter .
- Margins improved: gross margin rose to 30.2% (vs 28.6% YoY) and TechOps margin expanded to 25.3% on mix (leasing, AerSafe) and cost controls . Adjusted EBITDA rose to $9.5M (13.3% margin) from $8.2M (10.0%) YoY despite no whole-asset sales, highlighting the lease-pool strategy .
- Management reiterated a qualitative full-year view: excluding whole-asset sales, 2025 revenue should exceed 2024 with a greater YoY increase in EBITDA; pipeline visibility improved across Goodyear/Millington MRO and AerSafe demand into 2026 .
- Strategic catalysts: (i) lease-pool expansion (second 757 freighter placed; two more under LOI) ; (ii) “insatiable” engine demand supporting lease/trade monetization ; (iii) MRO bay utilization and long-term contract discussions that could stabilize recurring revenue .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Lease-led mix lifted profitability: Adjusted EBITDA rose to $9.5M (13.3% margin) from $8.2M (10.0%) YoY despite zero whole-asset sales; CEO: “our EBITDA margins expanded as we continued to strategically increase our lease pool” .
- TechOps margins scaled materially (13.6% → 25.3%) on refocus to higher-margin work; gross margin also improved to 30.2% on leasing mix and cost actions .
- Commercial momentum in AerSafe and MRO: AerSafe contributing meaningfully with a regulatory deadline supporting demand into late-2026; Goodyear pipeline expected to keep the facility near full capacity through 2026 .
-
What Went Wrong
- Consensus misses: revenue ($71.2M vs $93.9M*) and EPS ($0.04 vs $0.18*) below S&P Global expectations, driven by absence of aircraft/engine sales in Q3 .
- TechOps revenue declined modestly YoY (Roswell/Goodyear transitions), and company-wide SG&A remains sizable despite reductions ($18.6M vs $21.7M YoY) .
- Operating cash outflow YTD of $34.3M (inventory investments), with revolver usage up to $123.8M outstanding, indicating continued working-capital intensity in feedstock acquisition .
Financial Results
- Notes: Consensus values marked with an asterisk are from S&P Global; values retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment revenue breakdown
KPIs and operating mix
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “While the quarter did not include any sales of aircraft or engines, our EBITDA margins expanded as we continued to strategically increase our lease pool… [and] we were pleased to place an additional 757 freighter aircraft on lease during the third quarter of 2025.” — CEO Nicolas Finazzo .
- “Gross margin was 30.2%… due to higher leasing revenue, mix and cost control measures… [we] increased TechOps margins from 13.6% to 25.3%.” — Management commentary .
- “Looking to the fourth quarter and full-year performance, excluding flight equipment sales, we continue to expect full-year revenue in excess of 2024 levels, with a greater increase in EBITDA year-over-year.” — CFO Martin Garmendia .
- “At quarter end, our 2025 deliveries of AerSafe, plus current backlog, totaled more than $22 million, and we have sufficient orders secured to achieve our 2025 financial plan.” — Management .
- “Demand is insatiable [for engines]… we’re weighing cash sales versus long-term leases to optimize risk-adjusted margin.” — Management .
Q&A Highlights
- MRO expansions baseline (2026): Company expects ~$25M revenue at early run-rate from three projects with $4–$5M margins as facilities come online and scale .
- 757 program: Second aircraft placed; two more under LOI for near-term delivery; scarcity of true 757 alternatives improving placement prospects .
- USM/feedstock: Tight supply but disciplined acquisitions sustain margin/IRR; ample USM inventory to carry through 2026 even if buying slows .
- Engine market: Significant demand across NB/WB types; engine-shop cycle times are long; company balancing immediate cash sales versus leasing to maximize returns .
- Facility transitions: Goodyear near full on recommissioning/transition work through 2026; Roswell shifted to higher-margin teardown; Millington LOI for a large regional fleet .
Estimates Context
- Revenue: $71.2M actual vs $93.9M consensus* — significant miss primarily due to no aircraft/engine sales in Q3 .
- EPS (adjusted/primary): $0.04 actual vs $0.18 consensus* — miss as whole-asset sales embedded in estimates did not occur; adjusted EPS flat YoY .
- EBITDA: $9.5M adjusted actual vs $14.92M consensus* — miss; note consensus/actual may use different EBITDA methodologies; company reports adjusted EBITDA with reconciliation .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q3 headline misses versus consensus were driven by timing/absence of whole-asset sales; underlying mix (leasing/USM/AerSafe) strengthened margins, supporting the strategy to smooth volatility via lease pool growth .
- Consistent YoY gross margin and TechOps margin expansion indicate cost/mix progress; watch for continued leasing uplift and AerSafe shipments into the 2026 regulatory deadline .
- Near-term catalysts: additional 757 placements (two under LOI), engine lease/trade monetization amid tight market, and Goodyear/Millington pipeline conversion to longer-term contracts .
- Working-capital needs remain elevated as inventory/feedstock build continues; revolver utilization increased; monitor cash conversion cadence as asset monetization progresses .
- For modeling, reduce reliance on quarterly whole-asset sales timing; emphasize recurring leasing, MRO, and AerSafe contributions; company’s qualitative guide calls for FY25 revenue (ex-whole asset) above FY24 and a larger YoY increase in EBITDA .
- Upside scenario: faster 757 placements, accelerated engine turn-times, and incremental long-term MRO contracts. Downside: extended engine-shop bottlenecks and delayed asset sales could weigh on quarterly optics.