AH
Astrana Health, Inc. (ASTH)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Revenue grew 100% year over year to $956.0M, at the high end of Q3 guidance and modestly above Wall Street consensus; Adjusted EBITDA was $68.5M, also at the high end of guidance .
- GAAP diluted EPS was $0.01; management reiterated that cost trends remained within expectations, with guidance trimmed for FY25 solely due to timing of full‑risk contract transitions into Q1 2026 .
- FY25 guidance was lowered to revenue $3.10–$3.18B and Adjusted EBITDA $200–$210M (from $3.10–$3.30B and $215–$225M), citing delays unrelated to core performance; Prospect Health’s standalone Q3 performance exceeded expectations, and $12–$15M synergy targets were reaffirmed .
- Strategic catalysts: integration of Prospect (visibility, scale, leverage), Intermountain Health partnership in Nevada, and a new SoCal enablement client (~40K lives) onboarding in H1’26 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- “Astrana delivered solid third quarter results…strong momentum in our first quarter of combined operations with Prospect Health,” with Prospect exceeding expectations and integration progressing well .
- Cost trends “remained firmly within expectations,” with Medicare trending favorably; blended legacy Astrana trend ~4.5% YoY and Medicaid sequentially improved vs Q2 .
- Synergy plan reiterated: “We are reiterating our synergy targets of $12 to $15 million over the coming quarters” as enablement and platform standardization advance .
What Went Wrong
- EPS compressed to $0.01 diluted despite strong top line; Adjusted EBITDA margin was 7% vs 9% in the prior year quarter, reflecting higher “Other, net” items (e.g., $13.0M legal matter, ~$12.7M transaction/integration costs) .
- FY25 guidance cut (revenue and Adjusted EBITDA) due to delays in transitioning several contracts from partial‑ to full‑risk to Q1 2026, reducing expected FY25 contribution (timing, not fundamentals) .
- Care Partners margin lagged Enablement in Q3; management noted Prospect’s trend runs “several points higher” than legacy Astrana, with opportunity to normalize post-integration .
Financial Results
Quarterly Financials vs Estimates
Note: EPS consensus (“Primary EPS”) and EBITDA consensus reflect S&P Global methodologies and may not be directly comparable to GAAP diluted EPS or company-reported Adjusted EBITDA.
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment Breakdown (Q3 2025)
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Management attributed FY25 guidance cuts to timing delays in full‑risk transitions, with completion expected in Q1 2026; underlying cost trends and performance remained stable .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Prospect’s performance exceeded our expectations, and integration is progressing well…expanding our scale, capabilities, and physician reach across key markets.” — Brandon Sim, CEO .
- “We are reiterating our synergy targets of $12 to $15 million over the coming quarters…standardizing operating systems and implementing the Astrana technology platform.” — Management .
- “We now expect several payer contracts to transition…in the first quarter of 2026 instead of mid‑2025…this is purely a matter of timing.” — CEO .
- “Medical cost trend…was stable and in line with our expectations across both legacy Astrana and Prospect.” — CFO .
Q&A Highlights
- Guidance timing: FY25 reductions driven by delays across several payers and both legacy Astrana and Prospect; half procedural/regulatory filings, half operational feeds; clear sightline to Q1’26 go‑live .
- Segment margins: Enablement margins strong on scale from Prospect clients; Care Partners margins lower given Prospect’s higher trend, with opportunity to normalize as integration progresses .
- Medicaid/exchange exposure: Medicaid disenrollment manageable (mid‑ to high‑single digits annualized); exchange exposure ~3% of revenue; cautious stance into ’26 .
- MA rates: Expect margin stabilization/expansion in ’26/’27 with strong rate notices; minimal impact from V28; opportunity from matured full‑risk cohorts and synergies .
- Leverage/FCF: Net leverage ~2.5x PF; expect deleveraging via EBITDA growth and ~40–45% FCF conversion for FY25 .
Estimates Context
- Revenue modestly beat consensus in Q3: $956.0M actual vs $952.8M consensus*; Q2 beat and Q1 slight miss vs consensus* .
- EPS: Company reported GAAP diluted $0.01 vs S&P “Primary EPS” consensus $0.4413*; management did not provide non‑GAAP EPS, and S&P Primary EPS may differ from GAAP diluted .
- EBITDA: Company reported EBITDA $35.462M and Adjusted EBITDA $68.482M; S&P EBITDA consensus was $67.289M*, indicating definitional differences; Adjusted EBITDA landed at the high end of company guidance .
- Target price consensus mean: $42.38 from 8 estimates*; recommendation text unavailable via S&P pull.
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Integration execution strength: Prospect standalone performance ahead of plan, synergy target ($12–$15M) intact, and enablement margins robust—supportive of medium‑term margin trajectory .
- Revenue quality vs EPS optics: Strong top line and Adjusted EBITDA at guidance high end, but GAAP EPS compressed by non‑core items (“Other, net”), highlighting the relevance of Adjusted EBITDA to underlying performance .
- FY25 de‑risked by transparent timing: Guidance cut reflects delayed risk transitions, not operating deterioration; visibility to Q1’26 activation lowers execution risk and sets up FY26 acceleration .
- Cost trend discipline sustained: Medicare favorable, Medicaid improving sequentially; management expects Medicaid stabilization by late ’26, with MA rate tailwinds into ’27 .
- Balance sheet capacity: ~$462M cash, ~2.5x net leverage PF—room to invest while deleveraging via EBITDA growth and FCF conversion .
- Strategic partnerships as growth vectors: Intermountain Health in Nevada and new SoCal enablement client (~40K lives) should augment scale and platform leverage without immediate risk assumption .
- Near‑term trading lens: Focus on Q4 trend integrity and any early signals on Q1’26 full‑risk commencements; medium‑term thesis hinges on margin normalization at Prospect, enablement scale, and MA rate tailwinds .