Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

AS

Ascent Solar Technologies, Inc. (ASTI)·Q1 2016 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q1 2016 revenue was $0.71M, up ~8% YoY, with product sales up ~29% YoY to $0.69M; net loss improved ~41% YoY to $(10.5)M as non‑cash interest and operating efficiencies eased the drag versus Q1 2015 .
  • Distribution expanded meaningfully: EnerPlex products penetrated “more than 1,000” Verizon Wireless authorized retail locations nationally, a key set‑up for H2 sell‑through and brand visibility .
  • Liquidity remains the core risk/catalyst: cash was $0.35M at 3/31/16, with negative working capital and stated need for additional 2016 financing; management executed a $7M Series F in Jan and announced a $2M Series G in April (subsequent event) .
  • Listing transition: NASDAQ appeal was denied; shares moved to OTCQB on Feb 25, 2016—an overhang near‑term but not impacting operations per the company .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

  • What Went Well

    • Retail/channel expansion: “increased penetration…into more than 1,000 Verizon Wireless authorized retail stores,” bolstering distribution breadth and brand recognition .
    • Product sales mix improvement: product revenue rose ~$154k YoY (+~29%), reflecting expanded channels and EnerPlex acceptance .
    • YoY loss improvement: net loss improved ~41% YoY to $(10.5)M, aided by lower non‑cash interest following 2015 note restructuring and operational efficiencies .

  • What Went Wrong

    • Scale/gross economics: cost of revenues ($2.16M) far exceeded sales ($0.71M) due to under‑utilized factory and promotional pricing; management emphasized margin improvement hinges on higher volumes/utilization .
    • Liquidity stress: operating cash burn of $(5.86)M in Q1 with only $0.35M cash at quarter‑end; additional financing is required to fund 2016 .
    • Capital structure complexity/dilution risk: continued use of convertible preferred (Series F in Jan; Series G announced Apr 29) and an April exchange creating rights to ~42.1M common shares underscore ongoing dilution risk .

Financial Results

MetricQ2 2015Q3 2015Q1 2016
Revenue ($)$2,234,223 $1,253,056 $710,222
Operating Income (Loss) ($)$(6,927,146) $(7,034,246) $(7,503,639)
Net Income (Loss) ($)$(11,337,676) $(6,113,202) $(10,525,014)
EPS (Basic & Diluted) ($)$(0.37) $(0.11) $(0.05)

Revenue mix (segment proxy):

Revenue MixQ2 2015Q3 2015Q1 2016
Product Sales ($)$2,143,000 $1,177,000 $687,000
Gov’t R&D ($)$91,000 $76,000 $23,000

KPIs (distribution reach proxy):

KPIQ2 2015Q3 2015Q1 2016
Verizon Wireless partner retail presence~300 premium TCC stores 456 TCC premium retailers >1,000 authorized retail locations

Liquidity snapshot (quarter‑end):

MetricQ1 2016
Cash & Equivalents$350,323
Current Liabilities$15,122,282
Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity$(1,784,328)

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent Guidance/CommentaryChange
Operating Expenses2016n/a“Operating expenses to remain relatively flat while…increase revenue growth” Qualitative – maintained flat opex posture
Revenue2016n/aNo quantitative revenue guidance provided in Q1 release/10‑Q n/a
Liquidity/Financing20162015 disclosures highlighted need for financing Additional financing required; negative working capital at 3/31/16; executed Series F in Jan; announced Series G in Apr (subsequent) Reiterated/heightened
Listing/Trading Venue2016Prior NASDAQ deficiency notices in 2015 Transitioned to OTCQB effective Feb 25, 2016 New development

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

(No Q1 2016 earnings call transcript located in repository; themes synthesized from press releases and MD&A.)

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q2 2015, Q3 2015)Current Period (Q1 2016)Trend
Retail/channel expansionQ2: Broadening partners; Sports Authority/Cabela’s launch; Verizon TCC presence (~300) Q3: Expanded to 456 TCC premium retailers Entry into >1,000 Verizon authorized locations; “growing acceptance” of EnerPlex
High‑value PV markets (UAV/space/near‑space)Q2: Silent Falcon production supply Q3: MilPak finalist; continued UAV focus “Great traction” in space/near‑space/drone applications
Gross margin path/under‑utilizationQ2: Under‑utilized factory; margins pressured by promos Q3: Same under‑utilization; focus on raising utilization Under‑utilization persists; margin lift contingent on sales/usage improvements
Liquidity and capital structureQ2: Restricted cash release mechanics; continued financing needs Q3: Notes cancellation/amendment; new convertibles (Sept 2015) Requires additional 2016 financing; Series F in Jan; Series G announced Apr; exchange to fixed share rights
Listing status2015: NASDAQ compliance issues/appeals —NASDAQ appeal denied; trading moved to OTCQB Feb 25, 2016

Management Commentary

  • “Given the continuous expansion of our retail footprint…into more than 1,000 Verizon Wireless authorized retail stores, we remain optimistic on the opportunities ahead for growth.” — Victor Lee, President & CEO .
  • “Net loss for the quarter totaled $10.5 million, a significant improvement of approximately 41% compared to…last year,” driven by “increasing revenue, improved operational efficiencies, and significant reduction of non‑cash interest expenses” post 2015 note restructuring .
  • MD&A tone underscores scale economics and liquidity: factory “significantly under‑utilized,” with gross margin improvement dependent on sales growth; “additional financing” required to fund 2016 .

Q&A Highlights

  • No Q1 2016 earnings call transcript was found in the document repository; as a result, there are no Q&A highlights to report based on primary documents [ListDocuments returned none].

Estimates Context

  • Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q1 2016 EPS and revenue was unavailable via our feed during this analysis; we cannot benchmark reported results to consensus. If needed, we will refresh when data access is restored.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Distribution velocity is the near‑term growth lever: >1,000 Verizon authorized locations materially expand EnerPlex’s reach; monitor sell‑through in H2 seasonally stronger periods .
  • Profitability remains scale‑dependent: persistent under‑utilization and promotional mix keep gross economics negative; margin recovery requires volume and factory utilization gains .
  • Liquidity is the gating factor: $0.35M cash at quarter‑end and ongoing burns necessitate continued external financing (Series F closed Jan; Series G announced Apr 29), implying dilution risk until cash generation improves .
  • Capital structure complexity persists: conversions, embedded derivatives, and rights‑to‑shares exchanges add volatility and potential dilution; track subsequent events and redemptions closely .
  • Listing downgrade to OTCQB may depress liquidity and institutional interest near‑term but does not alter operations; re‑rating hinges on execution and funding visibility .
  • YoY loss improvement is tangible (~41%), reflecting lower non‑cash interest and operating efficiencies; sustaining this requires revenue acceleration through expanded retail and specialty PV wins .
  • Watch catalysts: retail POS performance, any large specialty PV orders (UAV/space), financing cadence/terms, and any return to a national exchange once financial criteria permit .

Notes:

  • Primary sources: Q1 2016 8‑K/press release ; Q1 2016 10‑Q ; Q3 2015 10‑Q ; Q2 2015 10‑Q and press release ; OTCQB transition 8‑K .
  • No Q1 2016 earnings call transcript was available in the repository at the time of this analysis.