AI
AXT INC (AXTI)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 revenue was $19.4m, down 22.9% sequentially and 14.7% year over year, while gross margin collapsed to -6.4% GAAP (-6.1% non-GAAP) on yield issues in semi-insulating GaAs, a 58% Q/Q drop in InP sales due to China export restrictions, and under-absorbed overhead; non-GAAP EPS was -$0.19 and GAAP EPS -$0.20 .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, revenue was slightly above ($18.94m* estimate vs $19.36m actual), but EPS missed (Primary EPS -$0.138* estimate vs -$0.19 actual), and EBITDA was materially below (estimate -$4.17m* vs actual -$8.05m*) .
- Management guided Q2 2025 revenue to $20–$22m and expects gross margin to recover to ~10%, excluding any InP shipments outside China until permits are received; non-GAAP loss per share guided to -$0.12 to -$0.14, GAAP -$0.14 to -$0.16 .
- Near-term stock narrative hinges on permit timing for InP exports (initial responses typically ~45 business days), sequential revenue growth in China data center and lidar demand, and measured execution in GaAs HBT to restore yields and margins; management expects margin improvement beginning in Q2 and continuing through 2025 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- China data center connectivity and domestic innovation efforts are creating incremental InP opportunities; management expects healthy double-digit Q2 growth from China data center applications off Q1 levels .
- Raw material JVs remained strong at $8.3m revenue in Q1, providing diversification and strategic supply chain benefits; JV portfolio spans gallium, arsenic, PBN crucibles, quartz, indium, and germanium .
- OpEx discipline: non-GAAP opex fell to $8.5m vs $10.5m in Q4, reflecting cost control amid revenue pressure .
What Went Wrong
- Gross margin severely disappointed due to three factors: 58% Q/Q reduction in InP sales (China restrictions), significant yield reduction in semi-insulating GaAs wafers for wireless HBT, and under-absorbed overhead on lower substrate sales .
- EPS and profitability deteriorated: GAAP net loss widened to -$8.8m (-$0.20/sh) and non-GAAP net loss to -$8.2m (-$0.19/sh), vs Q4 GAAP -$5.1m and non-GAAP -$4.3m .
- Geopolitical/tariff uncertainty: exports of InP require permits; shipments to the U.S. likely face tariffs (historically ~25% Section 301 in January), with cost sharing nuanced and evolving case-by-case .
Financial Results
Segment/Product and JV revenue:
Geography mix:
KPIs:
Guidance Changes
Notes: Q2 guidance excludes InP shipments outside China; management expects “several million dollars” of InP backlog to ship most likely in Q3 if permits are received .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We were highly disappointed with our gross margin performance in Q1… we stumbled in trying to scale too quickly [in GaAs HBT].… We expect to see improvement beginning this quarter and continuing through the balance of 2025.” — CEO Morris Young .
- “Revenue for Q1 2025 was slightly above the midpoint of our guidance at $19.4 million… Non-GAAP gross margin in the first quarter was a negative 6.1%.” — CFO Gary Fischer .
- “In keeping with our comments today, we believe Q2 revenue will be in the range of $20.0 million to $22.0 million… we do believe that we can see a recovery in our gross margin to around 10% in Q2.” — CFO Gary Fischer .
- “We have submitted comprehensive [InP export permit] applications… we typically hear back initial applications within 45 business days… we do not expect to be able to ship indium phosphide to customers outside of China before mid-June at earliest.” — CEO Morris Young .
- “Sales in Q1 [raw material JVs] were strong… we continue to invest in expanding our capability… we are ahead of the curve in developing this unique integrated supply chain.” — CEO Morris Young .
Q&A Highlights
- GaAs HBT yields: management acknowledged scaling too fast; expects quick margin recovery to ~10% in Q2 as yields stabilize; emphasizes measured approach and solution in hand .
- InP permits/backlog: earliest external shipments mid-June; “several million dollars” backlog could ship quickly (1–2 weeks after permits), driving inventory rebuild and potential overship vs end-demand in Q3/Q4 .
- Customer retention risk: AXTI believes it holds ~40–50% of global InP market; competitors limited by capacity/quality; customers continuing to place orders despite delays .
- Tariffs: January shipments paid ~25% Section 301 tariff; future rates under discussion; AXTI pursuing mitigation plans; cost-sharing varies by customer .
- HBT revenue sizing: one large customer represents a bit over $1m per quarter today; opportunity remains active despite Q1 stumble .
Estimates Context
Q1 2025 actuals vs S&P Global consensus:
Q2 2025 consensus vs company guidance:
Interpretation:
- Revenue was a modest beat vs consensus; EPS was a notable miss given margin compression; EBITDA fell well short amid yield issues and overhead under-absorption .
- Q2 revenue guidance is above consensus (ex-InP exports), signaling sequential growth driven by China demand and manufacturing improvements; EPS guidance still negative, reflecting gradual margin recovery .
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The margin reset is execution-driven and transitory: management expects ~10% GM in Q2 and further recovery through 2025 as GaAs HBT yields normalize and substrate volumes/mix improve .
- InP export permits are the swing factor: earliest H2 recovery for ex-China shipments; backlog visibility supports potential shipment surge and inventory rebuild in Q3/Q4, especially for AI/data center optics .
- China market strength is a near-term offset: domestic data center and lidar demand underpin sequential growth even without ex-China InP shipments in Q2 .
- Revenue guidance above Street sets a bar; EPS remains pressured: traders should watch margin cadence and yield execution in GaAs HBT as the primary driver of EPS normalization .
- JV raw materials provide ballast and strategic supply optionality, supporting revenue and cost structure resilience across cycles .
- Tariff outcomes are manageable but uncertain; case-by-case mitigation may reduce volatility once permit flow normalizes .
- Medium-term thesis: AXTI’s low-EPD leadership in InP/GaAs positions it for AI optical interconnect upgrades (EML/silicon photonics, photodetectors) and share gains in wireless HBT; permit timing and yield execution are the gating factors to re-rate .