AT
Aspen Technology, Inc. (AZPN)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Strong print: revenue $303.6M and non‑GAAP EPS $2.06 beat consensus ($294.5M revenue, $1.85 EPS) and topped prior intra‑quarter revenue guide ($290–$300M). License & Solutions grew 23.5% YoY; bookings rose to $307.5M; ACV up 9.2% YoY and 2.5% QoQ .
- No call/guidance: Due to Emerson’s $265/share tender offer, AZPN did not host an earnings call or provide updated guidance this quarter; watch deal process as the near‑term stock driver .
- Operating leverage improved: GAAP swung to income from operations ($9.0M) vs. loss prior year; non‑GAAP operating income up to $149.0M; free cash flow improved to $36.4M (vs. $29.2M) .
- Merger dynamics/activism: Post‑results, Elliott publicly opposed the tender as unfair to minorities, adding process uncertainty and potential price/disclosure pressure .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Beat on revenue and EPS: $303.6M revenue and $2.06 non‑GAAP EPS vs. ~$294.5M/$1.85 consensus; exceeded the earlier Q2 revenue guide high end ($290–$300M) .
- Mix and bookings strength: License & Solutions revenue grew 23.5% YoY to $188.2M; bookings rose to $307.5M (from $233.4M) .
- Profitability/FCF: GAAP operating income turned positive ($9.0M vs. $(49.2)M); non‑GAAP operating income to $149.0M; FCF improved to $36.4M (from $29.2M) .
-
What Went Wrong
- No updated guidance/call: Management withheld guidance and skipped the earnings call due to the Emerson tender, limiting fundamental transparency this quarter .
- Cash declined sequentially: Cash and cash equivalents fell to $181.8M (from $237.0M at FY24 end) reflecting buybacks and the Open Grid Systems acquisition outflow .
- Collections cadence remains a watch item: Management previously flagged collection timing issues in certain geographies and heavier H2 cash seasonality; investors lack a Q2 call update on remediation progress .
Financial Results
Revenue, earnings and cash flow vs prior periods and estimates
Segment revenue breakdown
KPIs and bookings
Estimates vs. actuals
Note: S&P Global consensus was unavailable via tool mapping this quarter; consensus figures above reference public Zacks/Nasdaq reporting.
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
(There was no Q2 FY25 call; themes below reference prior two quarters)
Management Commentary
- “We integrated more industrial AI and sustainability capabilities into our portfolio and launched our new microgrid solution…” – Antonio Pietri, Q1 FY25 .
- “We remain confident in our year 2025 guidance… ACV growth of approximately 9% and free cash flow generation of approximately $340 million.” – Antonio Pietri, Q1 FY25 .
- “We expect Q2 revenue to be between $290 million and $300 million…” – David Baker, Q1 FY25 .
- “As a result of… the Merger Agreement… AspenTech will not host an earnings conference call for its second quarter fiscal 2025 results nor provide future guidance.” – Q2 PR .
Q&A Highlights
(From Q1 FY25 call; no Q2 call held)
- ACV cadence and seasonality: Expect historical pattern; potential variability from large deals; growth largely mid‑term contracts rather than renewals .
- Microgrid and DGM opportunity: Microgrid opens non‑utility TAM (chemicals/refining, mining, transport); EU regulation accelerates network model management demand (OGS) .
- Collections timing: Administrative delays in certain geos drove softer Q1 cash; processes strengthened; FCF still H2‑weighted .
- Emerson channel: Joint go‑to‑market producing faster deals in APM; expect increasing contribution .
Estimates Context
- Consensus beat: Q2 FY25 non‑GAAP EPS $2.06 vs. $1.85; revenue $303.6M vs. $294.5M consensus, per public Zacks/Nasdaq reporting .
- S&P Global consensus was unavailable via tool mapping this quarter; thus, third‑party public consensus sources are cited instead.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Fundamental beat with quality mix: License & Solutions growth (+23.5% YoY) and bookings strength ($307.5M) underpinned revenue/EPS upside; ACV rose 9.2% YoY/2.5% QoQ, sustaining mid‑to‑high single‑digit ACV trajectory .
- Execution leverage: GAAP operating income turned positive; non‑GAAP operating income expanded sharply; FCF improved YoY despite no call to elaborate on drivers .
- Guidance vacuum: With guidance withheld and no call, the near‑term narrative is deal‑driven (tender process, potential competing views from activists), not new fundamentals—monitor tender milestones and any supplemental disclosures .
- DGM structural tailwinds intact: EU regulatory requirements for network model management and broader electrification/microgrid adoption support medium‑term growth, with OGS now integrated (cash outlay recognized) .
- Watchlists: Chemicals downcycle and collection timing risks remain watch items; cash generation expected to skew to H2 based on prior commentary; absence of Q2 call leaves less color on near‑term resolution .
- Tactical: Results topped prior intra‑quarter revenue guide high end ($303.6M vs. $290–$300M), a positive data point if deal timing elongates and fundamentals re‑assert as a secondary driver .