Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

CP

Concrete Pumping Holdings, Inc. (BBCP)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Revenue and margins improved sequentially; Q3 revenue of $103.7M beat S&P Global consensus ($99.8M*) and Adjusted EBITDA rose to $26.8M, while diluted EPS of $0.07 was roughly in line with consensus ($0.063*), reflecting operating discipline amid volume softness .
  • Segment mix showed resilience in U.S. Waste Management (+4% YoY revenue, +3% YoY Adj. EBITDA) against weaker U.S. Pumping and U.K. operations; gross margin was 39.0% vs 40.6% YoY, pressured by underutilization and pricing .
  • FY25 guidance was maintained at revenue $380–$390M, Adjusted EBITDA $95–$100M, and FCF ≈$45M; management reiterated recovery timing now late FY26/early FY27, with infrastructure steady and commercial still deferred due to rates/tariff uncertainty .
  • Liquidity strengthened to $358M with net debt of $384M and leverage ~3.8x; buybacks continued (≈593K shares, $3.8M), supporting capital returns despite macro headwinds .
  • Near-term stock narrative: modest top-line beat and maintained guide, plus Waste Management growth and continued buybacks, offset by pricing pressure and commercial softness—traders should watch Q4 margin trajectory and infrastructure project conversions .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • U.S. Waste Management grew revenue 4% YoY to $19.3M and Adj. EBITDA 3% YoY to $7.4M on organic volume and pricing strength; management emphasized “robust can pickup volumes and sustained improvement in pricing” .
  • Liquidity/Balance sheet: total available liquidity rose to $358.0M; continued buybacks (≈593K shares, $3.8M in Q3) underscore confidence and shareholder returns .
  • CEO tone on resilience and adaptability: “Our disciplined focus on cost management, fleet optimization, and strategic pricing helped buffer against topline softness” .

What Went Wrong

  • Consolidated revenue down 5.4% YoY to $103.7M; gross margin down 160 bps YoY to 39.0%, driven by lower volumes and underutilization .
  • U.S. Concrete Pumping revenue fell 7.9% YoY to $69.3M; segment Adj. EBITDA down 23% YoY to $15.6M amid commercial softness and higher rainfall in central/southeast .
  • U.K. Operations revenue down 5% YoY to $15.1M; management cited higher rates and commercial slowdown, with only infrastructure remaining resilient .

Financial Results

Consolidated Performance vs Prior Periods and Estimates

MetricQ3 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Revenue ($USD Millions)$109.617 $86.447 $93.958 $103.676
Diluted EPS ($USD)$0.13 $(0.06) $(0.01) $0.07
Gross Margin (%)40.6% 36.1% 38.5% 39.0%
Adjusted EBITDA ($USD Millions)$31.638 $17.011 $22.497 $26.843
Adjusted EBITDA Margin (%)28.8% 19.7% 23.9% 25.8%
Estimates vs Actuals (S&P Global)Q3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025
Revenue Consensus Mean ($USD)$99.764M*$99.016M*$90.281M*
Revenue Actual ($USD)$103.676M $93.958M $86.447M
Primary EPS Consensus Mean ($USD)$0.063*$0.043*$0.010*
Primary EPS Actual ($USD)$0.07 $(0.01) $(0.06)

Values retrieved from S&P Global*

Interpretation:

  • Q3 revenue beat consensus by ~$3.9M (~3.9%) and EPS was roughly in line; Q2 and Q1 were misses on both revenue and EPS as macro and weather pressures weighed .

Segment Breakdown

SegmentQ3 2024 Revenue ($M)Q3 2025 Revenue ($M)YoY ChangeQ3 2024 Adj. EBITDA ($M)Q3 2025 Adj. EBITDA ($M)YoY Change
U.S. Concrete Pumping$75.213 $69.271 (7.9%) $20.255 $15.604 (23.0%)
U.S. Waste Management$18.545 $19.337 +4.3% $7.155 $7.371 +3.0%
U.K. Operations$15.859 $15.068 (5.0%) $4.228 $3.868 (8.5%)
Total$109.617 $103.676 (5.4%) $31.638 $26.843 (15.2%)
Segment Net Income (Q3)Q3 2024 ($M)Q3 2025 ($M)
U.S. Concrete Pumping$4.954 $1.625
U.S. Waste Management$1.701 $1.391
U.K. Operations$0.905 $0.683
Total$7.560 $3.699

KPIs

KPIQ3 2025Q2 2025Q1 2025
Total Available Liquidity ($M)$358.0 $352.5 $409.6
Net Debt ($M)$384.0 $387.2 $339.9
Debt Outstanding ($M)$425.0 $425.0 $425.0
Leverage Ratio (x)~3.8x 3.7x 3.1x
Share Repurchases~593K shrs, $3.8M $7.8M in H1 2025 296K shrs, $1.9M

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
RevenueFY 2025$400–$420M (Q1’25) $380–$390M (Q2’25, maintained in Q3) Lowered in Q2; Maintained in Q3
Adjusted EBITDAFY 2025$105–$115M (Q1’25) $95–$100M (Q2’25, maintained in Q3) Lowered in Q2; Maintained in Q3
Free Cash FlowFY 2025≈$60M (Q1’25) ≈$45M (Q2’25, maintained in Q3) Lowered in Q2; Maintained in Q3

Management reiterated that meaningful construction market recovery is expected late FY26/early FY27 .

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 2025)Previous Mentions (Q2 2025)Current Period (Q3 2025)Trend
Macro rates/commercial demandElevated rates delaying commercial starts in U.S./U.K. Continued commercial deferrals; tariff uncertainty contributing to delays Commercial softness persists; larger projects (DCs/warehouses) durable but slower pace Ongoing headwind; cautious outlook
Residential demand/pricingResilient volumes; weather affected regions Emerging challenges and pricing pressure noted Residential resilient; pricing pressure persists in mountain/Texas; expected to ease in ~6 months Stable volumes; pricing pressure easing later
InfrastructureResilient; positioning for growth Resilient; offsetting broader pressures Robust in U.S./U.K.; HS2 and U.S. IIJA funding conversion supportive Positive, steady
Weather impactsSevere weather in central/mountain/southeast Adverse weather in Feb/Apr ~$2M Q3 revenue impact in central/southeast; May/Jun worse vs prior year Episodic headwind
Tariffs/uncertaintyNot directly impacted; uncertainty delays projects Uncertainty contributed to deferrals No direct impact; uncertainty slowing manufacturing commitments Persistent uncertainty
Pricing/competitionN/AN/ACompetitors pushing into complex projects; pricing pressure expected ~6 months Pressure near-term
Capital allocationSpecial dividend; strong liquidity +$15M buyback authorization increase Ongoing buybacks (593K shrs in Q3) and fleet investment Shareholder-friendly posture

Management Commentary

  • CEO: “Our disciplined focus on cost management, fleet optimization, and strategic pricing helped buffer against topline softness… We remain committed to generating healthy free cash flow… and deploying capital thoughtfully” .
  • CFO: “Gross margin declined 160 bps to 39%… ongoing cost control initiatives helped support margin performance, but could not fully offset lower volumes and fleet utilization” .
  • CEO on outlook: “Infrastructure remains resilient… HS2… opportunities domestically from IIJA… larger commercial projects such as data centers and warehouses remain durable” .
  • CEO on tariffs: “We do not anticipate any meaningful direct near-term impact… heightened uncertainty has contributed to delays” .

Q&A Highlights

  • Q4 margin trajectory: Management “feels good” about margin profile and volume; noted Q3/Q4 are “quite compatible” and an extra day in Q4; guide maintained and tightened previously .
  • Recovery timing: Recovery pushed out; optimism building into next year, but clearer upturn now late FY26/early FY27; manufacturing subdued amid tariff talks .
  • Pricing pressure: Competitors pursuing more complex projects amid light commercial softness; residential pricing pressure lingering ~six months before easing .
  • Weather quantification: ~$2M adverse impact vs prior year for Q3 (central/southeast regions), with May/June worse than last year .
  • Geographic footprint for mega projects: Footprint adequate; company expanding opportunistically to capture sizable projects (e.g., data centers, chip plants) .

Estimates Context

  • Q3 2025: Revenue beat ($103.7M vs $99.8M*), diluted EPS roughly in line ($0.07 vs $0.063*), suggesting disciplined execution despite macro pressures .
  • Q2/Q1 2025: Misses on both revenue and EPS versus consensus as commercial deferrals and weather weighed on volumes .
  • Forward implications: With FY25 guidance maintained, Wall Street estimates may modestly adjust for the Q3 revenue beat while reflecting the company’s cautious recovery timeline (late FY26/early FY27) .
    Values retrieved from S&P Global*

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Sequential improvement with a Q3 revenue beat and higher Adjusted EBITDA; EPS in line—evidence of cost control and disciplined pricing amid volume softness .
  • Waste Management (Eco-Pan) remains a bright spot, growing revenue and Adj. EBITDA YoY; consider it a stabilizer supporting consolidated margins .
  • Guidance unchanged after Q2 reset; watch Q4 for margin stability and infrastructure conversion as near-term stock catalysts .
  • Capital returns and liquidity are robust (liquidity $358M; net debt $384M; ongoing buybacks), providing downside support and optionality for M&A/fleet investments .
  • Risks: Persistent pricing pressure (~six months), weather disruption, deferred commercial starts, and tariff/manufacturing uncertainty may cap near-term upside .
  • Medium-term thesis hinges on infrastructure resilience and eventual commercial/residential recovery tied to rate cuts; management expects more pronounced improvement late FY26/early FY27 .
  • Monitoring items: U.S. Pumping utilization, regional residential pricing dynamics, HS2/U.S. IIJA project flow, and any revisions in FY25/FY26 outlook on the Q4 call .