Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Zachary M. Friedlis

Senior Vice President - Director of Retail Leasing at SAUL CENTERS
Executive

About Zachary M. Friedlis

Senior Vice President – Director of Retail Leasing at Saul Centers, Inc. since January 2024; with the Company since 2009 in progressively senior leasing roles (Assistant VP → VP → SVP) . Age 42 . Company performance context during 2024: total revenue rose to $268.8M (from $257.2M in 2023) while net income was $67.7M (vs $69.0M), with FFO to common and noncontrolling interests at $106.8M (vs $106.3M) and commercial portfolio leased at 95.2% (vs 94.1%) . Long-run TSR context (value of $100 initial investment): 2020–2024: $63.94, $112.91, $91.04, $93.56, $98.23 .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic impact
Saul Centers, Inc.SVP – Director of Retail LeasingJan 2024–presentLeads retail leasing across BFS’s portfolio of shopping centers and mixed-use assets .
Saul Centers, Inc.Senior Vice President, Retail LeasingMay 2022–Jan 2024Senior leadership in retail leasing .
Saul Centers, Inc.Vice President, Retail Leasing2017–2022Retail leasing management .
Saul Centers, Inc.Assistant Vice President, Retail Leasing2009–2016Retail leasing execution .

Fixed Compensation

Component2024 Amount
Salary (paid)$473,878
Base salary rate (effective May 1, 2024)$500,000
Annual bonus (Dec 2024)$75,000 (15% of base)
All other compensation (401k/SERP/auto/life/commissions)$86,344 (401k $20,700; SERP $14,401; Auto $12,600; Group life $1,129; Leasing commissions $37,514)

Notes

  • Bonuses are discretionary, informed by CEO recommendations; no formulaic target metrics are used for annual bonuses .

Performance Compensation

Equity awards (2024 grants and outstanding)

InstrumentGrant yearQuantity / statusAccounting grant-date fair valueVesting mechanics
Restricted stock (time-vested)2024Included in 2,100 total 2024 sharesIncluded in $67,964Vests annually over 5 years
Performance-based restricted stock (PSUs)2024Included in 2,100 total 2024 shares; +150 change potential based on performanceIncluded in $67,9645-year cliff; earned 50%–150% based on annual FFO vs Board target (90% threshold; 110% for 150%)
RSUs/PSUs “awarded not yet granted” (future tranches)Authorized900 sharesN/AContingent on target setting in future periods
Unvested restricted stock at 12/31/202420242,250 shares unvested$67,964As above

PSU plan mechanics

  • Metric: Annual Funds From Operations (FFO) vs Board-established target. Threshold 90% (50% earnout) to 110% (150% earnout). PSUs vest on the fifth anniversary; time-vested awards vest over five years .

Stock options

  • None disclosed for Friedlis; no options appear in the executive option table (options listed for other NEOs) .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

ItemDetail
Total beneficial ownership (common shares)3,971 shares; percent of class: “*” (less than 1%)
Unvested restricted shares2,250 (grant-year 2024); plus 900 “awarded not yet granted” authorized
Options outstandingNone disclosed for Friedlis
PledgingNo pledging disclosed for Friedlis in ownership footnotes
Stock ownership guidelinesThe Board does not prescribe stock ownership guidelines for executive officers
Hedging/short salesProhibited for all employees; insider trading policy requires pre-clearance and imposes blackout periods
Rule 10b5-1 plansPermitted with CFO pre-approval; 90-day+ cooling-off for directors/officers; detailed restrictions on amendments and overlapping plans
Deferred compensation (SERP)2024: Exec contrib $4,800; Company contrib $14,401; 2024 earnings $484; YE balance $22,946

Implications

  • Unvested RSUs/PSUs provide retention hooks and potential supply for future sales as tranches vest. No pledging and anti-hedging policy support alignment, though absence of formal ownership guidelines and currently small personal holdings indicate limited “skin in the game” relative to total shares outstanding .

Employment Terms

  • Contracts and severance: No employment or severance agreements with any executive officers; no predetermined termination or change-of-control compensation plan .
  • Clawback: Recoupment policy (effective Oct 2, 2023) mandates recovery of erroneously paid incentive compensation after qualifying restatements (3-year lookback), plus misconduct-based recoupment under the 2024 Stock Incentive Plan .
  • Non-compete / non-solicit: Not disclosed in the proxy or 10-K; no related provisions found.
  • Say-on-pay: 94.8% approval in 2023; triennial frequency adopted .

Performance & Track Record (Company context during tenure)

Metric20202021202220232024
TSR – value of $100 initial$63.94$112.91$91.04$93.56$98.23
Total revenue ($M)$257.2$268.8
Net income ($M)$69.0$67.7
FFO to common & NCI ($M)$106.3$106.8
Commercial portfolio leased94.1%95.2%

Notes

  • Figures reflect BFS consolidated performance; not attributable to any single executive. 2024 results reflect the initial ramp of Twinbrook Quarter Phase I, which the Company disclosed as a headwind to net income and FFO in the quarter/year due to expense recognition ahead of full revenue stabilization .

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Cash vs equity mix: 2024 compensation for Friedlis included salary ($473.9k), a discretionary bonus ($75k; 15% of base), and restricted stock ($67.964k grant-date fair value), plus benefits/perquisites ($86.3k). Equity grants to officers are split 50/50 between time-vested and performance-based awards (FFO-linked) .
  • Shift toward RSUs/PSUs: For 2024, named executive officers received restricted stock (no new stock options for Friedlis), with clear performance linkage for half the award via FFO targets .
  • Discretionary bonuses: Annual bonuses are subjective (no pre-set targets), a potential misalignment risk if discretion overrides performance outcomes; however, long-term equity uses explicit FFO hurdles .
  • Clawback and trading controls mitigate risk: Mandatory recoupment on restatements, hedging prohibitions, and pre-clearance/blackout policy reduce compensation-related risk-taking and inappropriate trading .

Equity Vesting & Insider Selling Pressure

  • Near-term vesting supply: 2,250 unvested restricted shares from 2024 grants plus 900 authorized future tranches. Time-based awards vest annually over five years; PSUs vest at the 5-year cliff subject to FFO performance (50%–150% earnout) .
  • Trading constraints: Pre-clearance required; quarterly earnings blackout from quarter-end until two full trading days after results; event-specific blackouts can also apply; 10b5-1 plans require 90-day+ cooling-off for officers .
  • Options: None, limiting in-the-money option overhang and related exercise-driven selling for Friedlis .

Equity Ownership & Beneficial Holdings Table

HolderShares beneficially ownedPercent of class
Zachary M. Friedlis3,971* (<1%)

Additional notes: excludes 3,449 depositary shares (1/100 of 6.125% Series D preferred) held by Friedlis, which are not common shares .

Employment & Benefits Details (2024)

ItemValue
401(k) employer contribution$20,700
SERP employer contribution$14,401
SERP account balance (12/31/2024)$22,946
Auto allowance$12,600
Group term life insurance$1,129
Leasing commissions (legacy activity)$37,514

Investment Implications

  • Alignment and retention: Balanced equity awards (time + FFO-based PSUs) and multi-year vesting support retention and pay-for-performance. Lack of formal ownership guidelines and relatively small disclosed personal holdings limit “skin in the game,” but anti-hedging and pre-clearance/blackout rules constrain adverse trading behavior .
  • Selling pressure: Expect periodic supply from RSU vesting rather than option exercises; any sales likely channeled via pre-cleared or 10b5-1 trades and outside blackout windows, moderating market impact .
  • Incentive levers that matter: Company sets annual FFO targets for PSU earnouts (50%–150%), directly tying a significant portion of equity to cash-flow performance; however, annual cash bonuses remain discretionary without disclosed metrics, warranting monitoring for pay-for-performance consistency over time .
  • Governance risk low on severance economics: Absence of employment/severance agreements and change-in-control packages reduces golden parachute risk; clawback policy further mitigates downside risk from restatements or misconduct .