BB
Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2024 was mixed: consolidated revenue declined 8.2% YoY to $1.10B on the 53rd week lap and closures, GAAP diluted EPS was $(0.93) while adjusted diluted EPS was $0.38, within the company’s prior Q4 guidance range of $0.32–$0.42 .
- Continuing operations showed margin compression: GAAP operating income margin fell to 1.7% (from 4.6%), adjusted operating income margin to 3.5% (from 7.7%), and restaurant-level margin to 12.4% (from 15.9%) YoY .
- 2025 outlook implies a reset: U.S. comps (2.0%) to flat, adjusted EPS $1.20–$1.40, commodity inflation 2.5%–3.5% (beef mid-single digits), labor inflation 4%–5%, capex $190–$210M; Q1 2025 adjusted EPS guided to $0.55–$0.60 .
- The board cut the quarterly dividend to $0.15 ($0.60 annualized) from $0.24, citing the Brazil refranchising impact and desire to align payout to post-transaction earnings; management highlighted Outback turnaround, menu simplification, Ziosk rollout (80% pay-at-table adoption in tests), and ~$22M annualized G&A savings as 2025 catalysts .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Flemings comp sales +3.0% in Q4; average check in U.S. up 4% with value-led trade-ups in Aussie 3‑Course (“hero” traffic driver) .
- Operational simplification underway: 10%–20% menu reduction across brands, everyday value replacing frequent LTOs, and Ziosk enabling 80% pay-at-table in tests to improve guest experience .
- Strategic portfolio action: sold 67% of Brazil, moved to franchise royalties with reduced earnings volatility; plan to earn interest on second installment and refocus capital on remodels .
-
What Went Wrong
- Industry underperformance: lost share by ~260 bps on sales and ~410 bps on traffic versus Black Box; U.S. comps −1.1% and combined U.S. traffic −5.1% in Q4 .
- Margin pressure: adjusted consolidated operating margin fell to 4.4% (from 7.5%); restaurant-level margins compressed on labor, operating, commodity, insurance/legal and advertising costs .
- Impairments and discontinued ops dragged GAAP: $31M domestic asset impairments; discontinued Brazil operations loss impacted EPS (GAAP diluted $(0.93) vs adjusted $0.38) .
Financial Results
Consolidated metrics (sequential trend)
Continuing operations (YoY comparison)
Segment breakdown (Q4 YoY)
KPIs – Comparable sales, traffic, average check by brand (U.S.; % YoY)
Comparable sales
Traffic
Average check per person
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Although our fourth quarter results were within our expected guidance range, we underperformed the industry and lost share… by 260 basis points on sales and 410 basis points on traffic.” — CEO Mike Spanos .
- “We are reducing our menu items in all brands by 10% to 20% in 2025… transitioning to abundant value as part of our everyday menu offering.” — CEO Mike Spanos .
- “We will now have immediate guest feedback at Outback through our partnership with Ziosk… in our test restaurants, approximately 80% of our guests are using Ziosk pay at the table.” — CEO Mike Spanos .
- “We have transitioned [Brazil] to a franchise model… a more stable revenue stream… we do not anticipate that the post-tax contribution will produce a meaningful contribution to our net income in 2025.” — CFO Michael Healy .
- “Our new annual dividend will be $0.60 per share compared to $0.96 per share previously.” — CEO Mike Spanos .
Q&A Highlights
- Demand/consumer: Management sees “choppy” conditions and “choosy” consumers; Q1 comps guided down 0.5% to 1.5%, with traffic −4% to −5% and pricing ~4% .
- Cost outlook: 2025 commodities 2.5%–3.5% (beef mid-single digits), ~76% locked; labor inflation ~4% .
- Outback turnaround: Focus on consistency of execution, quality, value, guest experience; testing in 14 stores, aiming for 50% of stores touched via remodel in 2–3 years and slower unit growth starting 2026 .
- G&A and investments: 2025 total G&A ~$225M; ~$22M annualized savings (≈$17M realized in 2025), $10M IT/Ziosk/product enhancements, $12M bonus reload .
- Marketing shift: Everyday value allows ~$10M non-working marketing savings; potential redeployment to working media if returns justify .
Estimates Context
- We attempted to retrieve S&P Global consensus estimates for Q4 2024 and Q1 2025, but access was unavailable due to a daily request limit being exceeded. As a result, we cannot provide definitive beat/miss vs Wall Street consensus for this quarter. Values intended for estimates would have been retrieved from S&P Global; however, they are unavailable at this time [SPGI daily limit error].
- Company provided Q1 2025 adjusted EPS guidance of $0.55–$0.60 and U.S. comps of (1.5%) to (0.5%) .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Margin reset and traffic recovery are central: adjusted operating margin compression and traffic underperformance vs industry make the Outback turnaround (menu simplification, everyday value, execution focus) the key near-term narrative driver .
- 2025 guidance is conservative amid inflation: steeper commodity (beef) and labor inflation, flat-to-down comps, and investment in IT/Ziosk suggest patience is warranted as initiatives scale through 2H 2025 .
- Capital allocation pivot lowers risk: Brazil refranchising reduces earnings volatility; dividend reset and leverage target (<3x lease-adjusted) prioritize balance sheet health and remodel ROI over new units .
- Segment dynamics mixed: U.S. segment revenue and operating income fell sharply YoY; International franchise royalties are stable; Flemings’ comps strength indicates premium brand resilience .
- Execution KPIs to watch: Ziosk rollout completion by April, guest satisfaction uplift, frequency gains, restaurant-level margin trajectory, and U.S. traffic stabilization across Outback, Carrabba’s, and Bonefish .
- Q1 headwinds baked in: Weather/holiday shifts are a ~4¢ EPS drag; comps down modestly; better momentum expected in 2H as everyday value scales, though guidance embeds choppiness .
- Potential stock catalysts: Evidence of share recapture vs industry (Black Box), improving traffic on Aussie 3‑Course, tangible remodel ROI, and execution of G&A savings could shift sentiment .