BC
Boxlight Corp (BOXL)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 missed Street on revenue, EPS, and EBITDA as tariffs and weaker industry demand compressed margins: revenue $29.3m vs $32.7m est*, EPS $(1.88) vs $(0.94) est*, EBITDA $(1.1)m vs $1.9m est*; gross margin fell to 29.1% (–470 bps YoY; –590 bps QoQ) due largely to $1.6m of incremental tariffs in the U.S. market .
- Sequentially, revenue declined 4.9% from Q2 2025 after a strong Q2 rebound, while net loss widened to $(6.2)m; Adjusted EBITDA swung to $(0.4)m from $1.3m in Q2 .
- Liquidity improved: cash ended at $11.8m (from $7.6m in Q2), aided by a $3.6m equity raise and $1.9m of warrant exercises; Boxlight regained Nasdaq compliance in October, removing a delisting overhang .
- Credit watch items: company disclosed covenant non‑compliance on borrowing base (July–Sept) and senior leverage ratio at quarter‑end under its Credit Agreement, highlighting ongoing balance sheet risk .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Strengthened balance sheet and listing status: Raised $3.6m gross via a registered direct offering, received $1.9m from warrant exercises, and regained Nasdaq compliance (Oct 8) .
- Product and market activity: Launched CL Totem digital signage in North America; management sees “opportunity‑rich” demand for upgrades and refresh cycles across K‑12 and corporate signage .
- Cash build: Cash rose to $11.8m with positive working capital of $1.5m at quarter‑end, from a $(0.5)m deficit in Q2 .
What Went Wrong
- Demand/mix and tariff pressures: Revenue down 19.2% YoY; tariffs increased by $1.6m in Q3, driving gross margin down to 29.1% (from 33.8% YoY; 35.0% QoQ) .
- Profitability deterioration: EBITDA $(1.1)m and Adjusted EBITDA $(0.4)m vs $1.6m and $2.2m in Q3’24; net loss widened to $(6.2)m vs $(3.1)m YoY .
- Credit covenant breaches: Not in compliance with borrowing base tests (July–Sept) and senior leverage covenant at 9/30/25, underscoring financing and liquidity risks despite the improved cash balance .
Financial Results
Income statement trend (YoY and QoQ)
Q3 2025 actual vs S&P Global consensus
Values with asterisks (*) retrieved from S&P Global.
Balance sheet & operating KPIs
Note: Company did not disclose a segment revenue breakdown in the Q3 press release and 8‑K materials –.
Non‑GAAP notes: Adjusted EBITDA adds back stock comp, derivative/warrant FV changes, and purchase accounting effects (inventory, deferred revenue), among other items – –.
Guidance Changes
Management commentary referenced a qualitative outlook and a market “reset,” but no numeric guidance ranges were issued in Q3 disclosures .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
(Note: No Q3 2025 earnings call transcript was available in the document set as of Nov 20, 2025.)
Management Commentary
- “The market cycle … is still in the process of resetting itself, but … evolving trade dynamics and disruption in government funding are having negative effects on the entire industry. Tariff costs, in particular, contributed to downward pressure on margins.” — CEO Dale Strang .
- “Despite these challenges, we see an opportunity‑rich future … numerous opportunities for product upgrades, replacements and refreshes … awarded multiple opportunities in both the K‑12 education and the corporate digital signage market segment.” — CEO Dale Strang .
- “We were … pleased to receive notice from Nasdaq … that our actions taken in the third quarter resulted in Boxlight regaining full compliance with their listing rules.” — CEO Dale Strang .
Q&A Highlights
- No Q3 2025 earnings call transcript was available in the filings/press releases set reviewed; therefore, no Q&A themes or clarifications could be extracted at this time.
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 delivered a broad miss vs S&P Global consensus: revenue $29.3m vs $32.7m est*, EPS $(1.88) vs $(0.94) est*, EBITDA $(1.1)m vs $1.9m est*, driven by tariff‑related gross margin compression and softer volumes/mix .
- Given the magnitude of the EBITDA and gross margin shortfall, near‑term Street models may need to reset lower on margins and profitability until tariff headwinds ease and demand normalizes .
Values with asterisks (*) retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near‑term pressure from tariffs and funding disruption is the central narrative; $1.6m tariff impact drove a 590 bps QoQ GM decline, flipping Adj. EBITDA negative despite lower OpEx .
- Liquidity runway improved with cash at $11.8m and total debt down to $36.7m, helped by a $3.6m equity raise and $1.9m warrant proceeds, but covenant non‑compliance highlights ongoing credit risk and lender dependence .
- Regaining Nasdaq compliance removes a key listing overhang; if sustained, this can broaden capital markets options and reduce technical pressure on the stock .
- Sequential revenue dip after Q2 rebound suggests recovery remains choppy; watch for order conversion in K‑12 refresh cycles and corporate signage to validate management’s “opportunity‑rich” pipeline .
- Execution focus: protect gross margin (pricing, sourcing, tariff mitigation), continue working capital improvements (inventory down materially YTD), and hold OpEx discipline to drive operating leverage on recovery .
- Trading lens: absent catalysts, prints will skew to margin/run‑rate cash metrics; any tariff relief, large K‑12 awards, or improved covenant footing could be upside catalysts; further covenant stress or dilution would be negative .
Values with asterisks (*) retrieved from S&P Global.