Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Raymond F. Lancy

Director at BRIDGFORD FOODS
Board

About Raymond F. Lancy

Raymond F. Lancy (age 71 as of Feb. 24, 2025) is a retired Bridgford Foods executive and current director (first appointed 2013). He served as CFO (2003–Oct. 2022), Treasurer (1995–Feb. 2023), and Vice President (2001–Feb. 2023), and was a member of the Executive Committee (2001–Oct. 2022). He is a CPA (inactive) and previously spent 10 years as an auditor at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP; he retired from employment on Feb. 1, 2023 and continues to provide consulting services to the Company .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Bridgford Foods CorporationChief Financial Officer2003–Oct. 2022 Executive Committee member; finance and management leadership
Bridgford Foods CorporationTreasurer1995–Feb. 2023 Treasury oversight
Bridgford Foods CorporationVice President2001–Feb. 2023 Executive leadership
Bridgford Foods CorporationExecutive Committee member2001–Oct. 2022 Served in lieu of CEO structure
Bridgford Foods CorporationDirector2013–present Full Board serves as Nominating Committee; Lancy is a member

External Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPAuditor~10 years (prior to 1992) Audit and assurance experience

Board Governance

  • Committee assignments: Nominating Committee member; not on Audit or Compensation Committees .
  • Independence: Not independent (retired executive and current consultant); BRID is a NASDAQ “controlled company” and relies on exemptions; Audit and Compensation Committees are fully independent, but Lancy is not on those committees .
  • Attendance: Board held 11 monthly meetings in FY2024; all directors attended at least 75% of Board and committee meetings on which they served .
  • Shareholder support: 2025 election results for Lancy: For 7,908,628; Withheld 338,476; Broker non-votes 281,514—consistent with broad slate support and typical controlled-company voting dynamics .
  • Board leadership/structure: Chairman of the Board (Michael W. Bridgford) is not a director; the Executive Committee (management) acts in place of a CEO; the Chairman may call executive sessions of independent directors as needed .

Fixed Compensation

Component (FY2024 unless noted)AmountNotes
Director meeting fees$29,280 BRID pays per-meeting fees; typical range $2,580–$2,780 per Board meeting; no annual retainer
Audit Committee feesN/ALancy is not on Audit; Audit Committee members receive $350–$550 per meeting
Compensation Committee feesN/ADirectors typically do not receive additional fees for Compensation Committee; Lancy is not a member
Consulting fees (FY2024)$6,773 Paid under consulting agreement after retirement
Consulting rate (agreement)$157.50/hour Terminable by either party on 30 days’ notice; reimburse reasonable expenses
Prior employment bonus paid in FY2024$48,642 Bonus earned prior to retirement; paid in FY2024
Total reported (FY2024)$84,695 Sum of director fees and all other amounts

Performance Compensation

Performance MetricMechanismTargetingNotes
Pretax income (Company)Discretionary cash bonuses to NEOs tied to overall profitabilityNo pre-set public targets; committee discretionCompany emphasizes pay-for-performance but did not award discretionary bonuses for FY2024
Business unit profit objectivesDiscretionary cash bonuses to NEOs tied to unit performanceNo pre-set public targets; committee discretionSupports alignment with operational performance
Long-term equityNone (no options/RSUs/grants in recent years)N/AStock plan expired in 2009; equity deemed of limited incentive value and expensing considered burdensome

Lancy’s FY2024 amounts reflect director fees plus a bonus earned before his retirement and modest consulting fees; directors do not receive equity grants, and there were no equity awards outstanding at FY2024 year-end .

Other Directorships & Interlocks

CategoryDetail
Other public company boards (past 5 years)None for any BRID directors
Non-profit/academic/private boardsNot disclosed for Lancy beyond PwC prior employment
Interlocks with competitors/suppliers/customersNot disclosed; related-party relationships (legal counsel, family consultants) are reviewed and pre-approved by Audit Committee

Expertise & Qualifications

  • CPA (inactive); former CFO/Treasurer; deep finance, management, and audit background; 10 years at PwC .
  • Extensive knowledge of Company operations and financial controls; continues consulting on business development and strategic partnering .

Equity Ownership

HolderShares Beneficially Owned% of Outstanding Shares
Raymond F. Lancy242 <1%
Shares outstanding (record date)9,076,832 N/A

BRID family entity (BII) controls ~78.8% (7,156,396 shares), underscoring controlled-company dynamics; all directors and executive officers as a group held ~80.7% .

Insider Trades

PeriodSummarySource
Last 18 monthsNo reported Form 4 insider transactions by Raymond F. Lancy

Governance Assessment

  • Independence and conflicts: Lancy is classified “not independent” due to his status as a retired executive and current consultant; his consulting agreement (hourly, at-will terminable) creates ongoing related-party exposure, though BRID’s Audit Committee pre-approves related-party transactions per charter .
  • Committee effectiveness: He is not on the Audit or Compensation Committees (which are fully independent and include three audit committee financial experts), reducing potential conflicts in pay and financial oversight; he is on the full Board Nominating function .
  • Attendance and engagement: The Board met 11 times in FY2024; all directors met at least the 75% attendance threshold, indicating baseline engagement .
  • Director compensation alignment: Directors receive cash per-meeting fees and no equity; Lancy’s modest share ownership (242 shares) suggests limited direct equity alignment, but BRID’s controlled-company structure and family ownership dominate alignment dynamics; hedging of company stock is prohibited for directors .
  • Shareholder signals: 2025 election support for Lancy was consistent with broad slate approvals; a shareholder proposal to take the Company private failed (For 690,046; Against 7,555,665), reflecting controlled-company voting outcomes and management’s reinvestment focus .

RED FLAGS

  • Related-party exposure: Ongoing consulting relationships with former executives/directors (including Lancy), family legal services, and family consultants necessitate robust Audit Committee oversight; BRID is a controlled company and exempts certain independence requirements .
  • Low director equity alignment: No equity grants; Lancy’s personal holdings are minimal (242 shares) relative to outstanding shares .
  • Structural governance: Chairman is not a director; Executive Committee substitutes for CEO role, which may diffuse accountability compared to a standard single-CEO structure .

Say-on-Pay & Shareholder Feedback

  • Say-on-pay cadence: Every three years; last approval at 2024 Annual Meeting; next say-on-pay vote in 2026 .

Compensation Committee Analysis

  • Composition: Scott (Chair), Andrews, Schott—all independent; typically does not retain compensation consultants; uses competitive company data when reviewing pay .
  • Meetings: One meeting in FY2024; no additional fees to directors for Compensation Committee service .
  • Policy posture: Emphasizes pay-for-performance via discretionary cash bonuses tied to pretax income and business unit performance; no long-term equity grants outstanding .

Related Party Transactions

  • Lancy’s consulting agreement: Effective Feb. 2, 2023; $157.50/hour; 30-day termination; reimbursable expenses; paid $6,773 in FY2024 .
  • Audit Committee pre-approval: Required for related-party transactions per charter; examples include family legal services and consultants .

Voting Support Snapshot (2025 Annual Meeting)

DirectorVotes ForVotes WithheldBroker Non-Votes
Raymond F. Lancy7,908,628 338,476 281,514

Director Compensation (FY2024)

ComponentAmount
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash$29,280
All Other Compensation (bonus earned pre-retirement + consulting)$55,415
Total$84,695

Committee Assignments

CommitteeRoleNotes
Nominating (full Board)MemberFull Board performs nominating functions; actions require majority of independent directors
AuditNot a memberCommittee is fully independent; meets quarterly with auditors
CompensationNot a memberCommittee is fully independent; one meeting in FY2024

Policies and Risk Controls

  • Hedging/Derivatives: Company prohibits director and employee hedging/offsetting transactions in BRID equity .
  • Code of Ethics and Insider Trading Policy: Adopted and posted; insider trading policy filed as exhibit to 2024 Annual Report .

Employment & Contracts

ItemDetail
Consulting AgreementEffective Feb. 2, 2023; hourly rate $157.50; 30-day at-will termination; allowed to contract elsewhere if no conflict; confidentiality and IP assignment provisions
Severance/COCNo severance or change-in-control agreements for NEOs; directors compensated via fees; Lancy’s consulting is at-will

Equity Ownership Alignment

  • Beneficial ownership: 242 shares; less than 1% of outstanding shares .
  • Pledging: Not disclosed; hedging prohibited by policy .
  • Ownership guidelines: Not disclosed for directors .

Performance & Track Record

  • Company pay-versus-performance disclosures indicate CAP correlated with net income trends; TSR declined in FY2024; no equity awards outstanding; Lancy included among NEOs in FY2022 as an Executive Committee member before retirement .

Implications for Investor Confidence

  • Lancy brings deep finance and audit expertise from CFO tenure and PwC, but his non-independent status and ongoing paid consulting relationship represent persistent related-party and independence optics risks; mitigation depends on robust Audit Committee pre-approval and the absence of committee roles in pay/financial oversight .
  • Minimal personal equity holdings and the absence of director equity grants limit alignment via “skin-in-the-game”; BRID’s controlled-company structure concentrates governance influence within the founding family, which moderates the relevance of minority shareholder voting outcomes (e.g., private proposal defeat) .