BH
BAIYU Holdings, Inc. (BYU)·Q1 2014 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2014 net income was $1.09M, down 30% YoY as guarantee defaults and lower permissible lending rates compressed earnings; EPS was $0.105 vs $0.174 YoY .
- Net revenue fell 23% YoY to $2.05M as net commission on guarantee services swung to a loss, driven by an under-provision reversal to address guarantee losses (under/(over) provision of $(0.31)M vs +$0.04M YoY) .
- Credit quality deteriorated: nonaccrual loans rose to $4.88M (5.46% of loans) from $2.82M; allowance increased to $1.95M (2.18% of loans) and accrual for guarantees to $0.89M, reflecting repayment obligations on defaulted guarantees .
- Management cited regulatory rate caps and tighter PBOC liquidity as headwinds, and became more cautious on new loan originations; guarantee defaults required $5.45M of repayments to banks .
- No formal guidance or earnings call transcript was provided; S&P Global Wall Street consensus estimates were unavailable for BYU, so estimate comparisons cannot be made (consensus unavailable via SPGI tools).
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- “Interest expense on short-term bank loans decreased by $60,965, or 20%,” driven by lower bank borrowing balances ($16.2M vs $20.7M YoY) .
- Management tightened underwriting and became more cautious amid shadow banking risks: “management decided to grant new loans in a more cautious manner” .
- Operating discipline contained core opex lines; salaries and business taxes modestly declined YoY .
What Went Wrong
- Rate cap pressure: “maximum interest rate… permitted… shall be fifteen percent compared to eighteen percent previously,” reducing net interest income despite a slightly larger loan portfolio .
- Guarantee stress: “a number of our financial guarantee customers defaulted on their loans… outstanding repayment balance amounted to $5.4 million,” driving a $(0.31)M under-provision in guarantee services .
- Credit deterioration: more loans migrated from “special mention” to “substandard” and “doubtful,” increasing the allowance and nonaccruals to $4.88M (vs $2.82M) .
Financial Results
Income statement comparison (YoY)
Revenue and fee composition
KPIs and balance sheet (trend)
Note: Company operates a single reportable segment (financial services in PRC), per ASC 280 disclosure .
Guidance Changes
Management did not issue formal quantitative guidance in the 8‑K or 10‑Q .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
No Q1 2014 earnings call transcript was identified for BYU in the period; therefore, themes and Q&A comparisons are unavailable .
Management Commentary
- “The decrease is the net effect of decrease in effective weighted average loan interest rate… due to… maximum interest rate… permitted… fifteen percent compared to eighteen percent previously” .
- “People’s Bank of China withdrew a significant amount of liquidity… management decided to grant new loans in a more cautious manner” .
- “During the three months ended March 31, 2014, a number of our financial guarantee customers defaulted… As of March 31, 2014, the outstanding repayment balance amounted to $5.4 million” .
- “Non-interest expenses… increased… primarily due to… audit-related fees… and an increase in D&O insurance premium of $70,875” .
Q&A Highlights
No earnings call or Q&A transcript was available for Q1 2014 .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus estimates via S&P Global were unavailable for BYU Q1 2014 due to missing coverage mapping in the SPGI dataset, so comparisons to consensus EPS and revenue cannot be made (consensus unavailable).
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Regulatory rate caps in Jiangsu compressed loan yields and net interest income despite stable loan balances; expect continued NIM pressure unless policy eases .
- Guarantee business stress is material: defaults required $5.45M of bank repayments and drove a swing to net commission loss; watch guarantee exposure reductions and recoveries from counter‑guarantors/collateral .
- Credit quality deteriorated with nonaccruals and allowances rising; litigation and collections are in process—near‑term earnings carry elevated provisioning risk .
- Liquidity tightened (cash fell to $5.20M; restricted cash down), and operating cash flow declined; financing flexibility remains via short‑term bank lines, but growth capital may be constrained .
- Management is prudently slowing originations amid shadow banking risks; expect lower volume but potentially improved credit selection over coming quarters .
- No formal guidance was issued; with estimates unavailable, trader focus should be on subsequent guarantee recoveries, nonaccrual trends, and any regulatory changes affecting rates .
- Structural note: BYU operated a single PRC microcredit/guarantee segment in 2014; subsequent strategic shifts (e.g., P2P platform launch) were nascent and not revenue‑generating in Q1—limited diversification benefit in near term .