CONAGRA BRANDS INC. (CAG) Q4 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 FY25 was mixed: revenue fell 4.3% YoY to $2.78B and adjusted EPS declined 8.2% to $0.56 as cost inflation, FX and supply constraints offset productivity; adjusted operating margin was 13.8% . Versus S&P Global consensus, revenue and EPS were slightly below ($2.84B est vs $2.78B actual; $0.58 vs $0.56), while EBITDA tracking depends on definition (SPGI actual $476M* vs company adjusted EBITDA $544M) .*
- FY26 guidance introduced: organic sales (1)% to +1%, adjusted operating margin ~11.0–11.5%, adjusted EPS $1.70–$1.85; management expects ~4% core inflation plus ~3% tariff-driven COGS inflation (net ~1% mitigations planned), with 53rd week adding ~$0.05 to EPS .
- Management doubled down on volume-led growth in Frozen and Snacks despite near-term margin pressure; service levels recovered to ~98% in Q4 and productivity is guided “north of 5%” in FY26 including tariff mitigation .
- Portfolio reshaping and cash discipline continue (Chef Boyardee, Van de Kamp’s/Mrs. Paul’s divested; quarterly dividend maintained at $0.35); net debt reduced to $8.0B, net leverage 3.6x at FY25-end .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
- What Went Well
- Service recovery to ~98% in Q4, positioning Frozen/Snacks for renewed volume programs; strong innovation (e.g., Banquet Mega Chicken Filets) and planned multi-serve expansion underpin strategy .
- Productivity momentum and mitigation: FY26 plan targets >5% including tariff mitigation; core productivity around 4% vs ~4% delivered in FY25 .
- Cash generation and balance sheet: FY25 free cash flow was $1.30B; net debt down 4.4% YoY to $8.00B; net leverage 3.6x; dividend maintained at $0.35/share .
- What Went Wrong
- Q4 topline/margins pressured: net sales down 4.3% YoY; adjusted gross margin down 184 bps to 25.8%; adjusted operating profit down 10.5% YoY as COGS inflation and operating deleverage outweighed productivity .
- Segment softness: Refrigerated & Frozen sales -4.4% and adj. OP -10.1%; Foodservice adj. OP -20.8% amid volume declines; International sales -13.8% due to FX/M&A despite +0.8% organic .
- FY26 outlook embeds sustained inflation/tariff headwinds, driving a reset in adjusted operating margin to ~11–11.5% and lower adjusted EPS ($1.70–$1.85), prioritizing volume over near-term profitability .
Financial Results
Vs. S&P Global consensus – Q4 FY25
- Note: S&P Global shows an EBITDA actual of ~$476.1M under its standardized definition; company-reported adjusted EBITDA was $544.2M, highlighting methodology differences . Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.*
Segment performance – Q4 FY25
KPIs – Q4 FY25 and FY25 cash metrics
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “While the second half was impacted by higher than expected inflation, foreign exchange headwinds, and supply constraints, our long-term value creation strategy remains unchanged.”
- “In fiscal 2026, we expect elevated inflation and macroeconomic uncertainty to persist but remain focused on… investing in our high-potential frozen and snacks domains… enhancing supply chain resiliency… disciplined cost management and focus on cash flow.”
- On margin path: “We are investing margin this year in the service of volume… We absolutely expect margin expansion going forward, particularly in frozen,” with building blocks including productivity >5%, eventual inflation relief, supply chain repatriation, targeted pricing, and AI-enabled process reengineering .
Q&A Highlights
- Investment vs. margins: Management prioritized volume recovery in Frozen/Snacks despite a sixth year of above-normal inflation; expects margin expansion post-FY26 via productivity, repatriation, and targeted pricing .
- Inflation/tariff breakdown: FY26 core COGS inflation ~4% (animal proteins double-digit; corrugated, cocoa, labor, warehousing up); tariffs add ~3% with ~1% mitigations planned .
- Pricing/elasticity: Company elasticity in grocery near minus one; taking price in tariff-impacted canned categories to protect cash while investing behind growth domains .
- Dividend/leverage: Plan to maintain dividend while investing and paying down ~$700MM debt in FY26 (proceeds plus discretionary FCF); leverage elevated near term due to profit pressure but targeted deleveraging continues .
- Productivity/private label: FY26 productivity ~4% core + ~1% tariff mitigation; monitoring private label exposure in tomatoes, whipped topping, cooking spray with agile pricing .
Estimates Context
- Q4 FY25 vs S&P Global consensus: revenue $2.78B vs $2.84B (miss), adjusted EPS $0.56 vs $0.58 (miss), EBITDA $476M (SPGI actual) vs $511M consensus (miss); company-reported adjusted EBITDA was $544M, reflecting definitional differences . Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Forward implications: Given FY26 margin reset and higher cost outlook, Street estimates may drift lower on EPS/margins near term, with potential upward revisions if tariff outcomes ease or productivity/supply-chain benefits exceed plan .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term margin reset to fund volume growth; FY26 guide embeds elevated inflation/tariffs with mitigations; expect a stronger margin trajectory in FY27 as productivity, repatriation and pricing accrue .
- Frozen/Snacks remain the growth engines; service levels back to ~98% and innovation pipeline performing (e.g., Mega Chicken Filets); watch execution on capacity expansions and multi-serve rollout .
- Mixed Q4 print vs consensus with modest revenue/EPS misses; methodology differences cloud EBITDA comparisons—use consistent definitions when benchmarking .*
- Cash discipline intact: robust FCF ($1.30B FY25), debt reduction, dividend maintained; FY26 plan includes ~$450MM capex and ~$700MM debt paydown .
- Tariff path is a swing factor; management assumes significant COGS impact—any regulatory relief or successful mitigation/pricing could drive upside to FY26 margins .
- Portfolio pruning continues (Chef Boyardee, Van de Kamp’s/Mrs. Paul’s); expect continued tilt toward Frozen/Snacks assets and potential further grocery exits over time .
- Trading lens: Stock likely most sensitive to signs of elasticity resilience in canned pricing, progress on chicken capacity/service, and updates on inflation/tariff trajectory and AI-enabled productivity ramp .
Footnote: *Values retrieved from S&P Global.