CI
CareDx, Inc. (CDNA)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Strong quarter with total revenue of $100.1M (+21% YoY) and non-GAAP diluted EPS of $0.28; delivered record revenue across Testing Services, Patient & Digital Solutions, and Products, while turning GAAP net income positive to $1.7M .
- Results exceeded S&P Global consensus: revenue beat by ~5% ($100.1M vs. $95.3M*) and EPS beat by ~14c ($0.28 vs. $0.14*); CareDx raised FY25 revenue guidance to $372–$376M (from $367–$373M) and Adjusted EBITDA to $35–$39M (from $29–$33M) .
- Margin and cash execution inflected: non-GAAP gross margin ~71% (up 190 bps YoY); cash collections for Testing Services reached 124% of revenue with DSOs improving to 44 days from 71, driven by RCM automation and process wins .
- 4Q25 outlook embeds continued pricing/collections tailwinds (revenue per test $1,400–$1,420, including $4–$6M prior-period collections) and further sequential growth (implied Q4 revenue $101–$105M) .
- Key swing factors: (1) Epic Aura integrations scaling (target ~10% of volume by YE25, ~50% by YE26) , and (2) LCD finalization in early 2026—management reiterates modeled headwind scenarios ($15M or $30M annualized) first laid out in Q2 and unchanged near term .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Broad-based growth: Total revenue +21% YoY to $100.1M, with Testing Services +19% YoY to $72.2M and volumes up 13% to ~50,300; Patient & Digital +30% YoY to $15.4M; Product +22% YoY to $12.5M .
- Cash and collections execution: Cash collections hit 124% of Testing Services revenue; DSOs improved to 44 days from 71; $19M sequential AR reduction; record October collections .
- Strategic pipeline and evidence: Launched HistoMap Kidney (tissue-based gene expression) with early-2026 availability; new SHORE Heart study validated AMR detection; AlloSeq Tx11 and IVDR certifications reinforce global product strength .
-
What Went Wrong
- Macro volumes: Overall transplant volumes were relatively flat YoY across organs; anticipated late-2025 acceleration, especially in kidney, did not materialize in Q3 amid media scrutiny around allocation practices .
- Q2 headwinds and noise: Prior quarter’s GAAP results reflected a $3.8M write-off of aged receivables on prior-period tests; management emphasized focus on “revenue per test” to minimize variability from out-of-period adjustments .
- LCD uncertainty: Draft LCD scenarios imply potential $15M or $30M annual headwinds depending on final design (frequency limits vs. single-test DOS policy), with timing and final provisions still pending into early 2026 .
Financial Results
Summary financials (oldest → newest)
Actuals vs S&P Global consensus (oldest → newest)
Values with asterisks (*) retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment revenue ($M) (oldest → newest)
KPIs (oldest → newest)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We achieved record-setting third quarter 2025 financial results... guided by putting our customers at the center of everything we do.” — John W. Hanna, CEO .
- “Cash collections... accelerated to 124% of testing services revenue... DSOs improved from 71 to 44 days.” — Nathan Smith, CFO .
- “We expect to recognize revenue per test of $1,400–$1,420 in Q4, inclusive of $4–$6M of collections in excess of receivables.” — CFO .
- “We continue to anticipate the draft LCD policy will be finalized in early 2026... expectations are unchanged today.” — CEO .
- “We are officially live at Boston Children’s... 20% reduction in order turnaround time and 60% reduction in specimen holds.” — CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- ASP durability: Management sees durable uplift from strong cash collections on historical claims, increasing predictability of future ASP; Q4 revenue per test guided to $1,400–$1,420 as modeling baseline .
- Epic rollout: ~150 active discussions; ~40 centers expected to go live in 2026; typical 10% uplift post-go-live (too early to quantify); meaningful reductions in TAT and specimen holds observed .
- IOTA dynamics: Kidney volume acceleration delayed by media scrutiny; government clarifications expected to restore center confidence; modest pickup expected into Q4 and materially in 2026 .
- LCD financial sensitivity: If finalized as drafted with frequency limits/bundling → ~$15M headwind; if single-test DOS eliminates AlloMap Heart in HeartCare → ~$30M headwind; no current utilization impact observed .
- Competitive landscape: Management attributes softer August/September more to seasonality and macro, not competition; kidney business up ~20% YoY driven by surveillance protocol re-adoption .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025: Revenue beat by ~$4.8M (Actual $100.06M vs. $95.25M*); EPS beat by ~14c ($0.28 vs. $0.142*). Drivers: RCM collections above accruals ($5.9M benefit), volume growth across organs, and margin discipline .
- Q2 2025: Revenue miss vs. consensus (Actual $86.68M vs. $90.56M*), EPS roughly in line/slight miss ($0.10 vs. $0.122*), complicated by a $3.8M write-off of aged receivables tied to prior periods .
- Q1 2025: Revenue in line (Actual $84.69M vs. $84.54M*), EPS beat ($0.10 vs. $0.068*), with early RCM initiatives and protocol adoption momentum .
Values with asterisks (*) retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Momentum re-accelerated in Q3 with broad-based growth, a clean beat, and raised FY25 guidance; sustained RCM wins (124% collections/DSO 44 days) are improving quality of revenue and margin visibility .
- Near-term catalysts: Q4 revenue per test uplift, continued Epic Aura integrations (10% of volume by YE25; 50% by YE26), and ongoing center protocol re-adoptions supporting kidney growth .
- Watch LCD finalization in early 2026; baseline scenario assumes
$15M annual headwind with frequency limits, with larger risk if single-test DOS removes AlloMap Heart from HeartCare reimbursements ($30M) . - Product and data moat expanding (HistoMap Kidney launch, SHORE Heart AMR validation, IVDR certifications), enhancing long-term differentiation and international opportunities .
- Q2 noise from prior-period adjustments contrasts with Q3’s clean execution; management’s shift to “revenue per test” metric should reduce confusion and better align with forward fundamentals .
- Medium-term thesis: penetration gains (surveillance protocols), operational efficiency (RCM + Epic), and portfolio breadth (tests, digital, pharmacy, products) can sustain double-digit growth and EBITDA scaling, pending LCD outcomes .