CE
CAMBER ENERGY, INC. (CEI)·Q2 2016 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Calendar Q2 2016 (quarter ended June 30, 2016): revenue fell to $0.15M and diluted loss per share widened to $(0.80); operating loss was $(0.94)M and net loss was $(1.37)M, driven by lower volumes and higher lease operating/workover expense .
- Year-over-year declines reflect a 49% volume drop and a 24% realized price decline; management restarted workovers late in the quarter to bring shut-in wells online, expecting production increases in coming quarters .
- Liquidity and going-concern issues remained acute: working capital deficit expanded to $10.9M; financing hinged on closing the pending asset acquisition (Hunton assets) in Aug/Sep 2016 and related capital transactions .
- NYSE MKT delivered a non‑compliance notice in July (equity deficiency); management submitted a plan to regain compliance, with acquisition financing and ~1,000 BOE/d target production from acquired assets cited as remediation catalysts .
- No Wall Street consensus estimates were available via S&P Global for CEI; estimate comparison and beat/miss assessment therefore not applicable (S&P Global data unavailable).
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Workover program resumed late June, returning multiple shut-in wells to service; management reported an uptick in production volumes and expects continued increases as legacy wells return online (“we saw a resulting uptick in our production volumes. We expect to see an increase in production from our legacy wells continue throughout the remainder of this year.”) .
- Operating efficiencies: certain G&A categories declined excluding transaction costs; share-based compensation decreased ~30% year over year .
- Strategic path clarified: anticipated closing of Hunton acquisition in Aug/Sep 2016 with plan to drill six initial wells and rebrand as Camber Energy, expanding footprint and targeted development schedule .
What Went Wrong
- Revenue deterioration: net operating revenues fell to $0.153M from $0.394M YoY due to 49% volume decline and lower realized prices, compressing scale and profitability .
- Cost pressure: lease operating expenses rose to $0.276M (up ~70% YoY), largely from workovers; total operating expenses increased to ~$1.095M, deepening operating loss .
- Liquidity and going concern: working capital deficit widened to $10.9M; dependence on pending financing/asset acquisition remained high with explicit going‑concern disclosure, and NYSE MKT compliance deficiency presented listing risk .
Financial Results
Calendar Q2 2016 corresponds to the quarter ended June 30, 2016 (reported by Lucas Energy as FY2017 Q1).
Key operating and KPI detail:
Narrative drivers:
- YoY revenue decline ($0.24M) reflects unfavorable volume variance (
$0.15M) and price variance ($0.09M) . - LOE increase includes concentrated workover spend to return wells to service .
Estimates comparison:
- No S&P Global consensus EPS or revenue estimates were available for CEI for Q2 2016 (S&P Global data unavailable).
Guidance Changes
Formal numerical guidance was not provided. Strategic/timing updates disclosed:
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
No earnings call transcript was available for Q2 2016. Themes synthesized from press release and 10‑Q narrative:
Management Commentary
Key strategic messages:
- “With the shareholder vote on the proposed acquisition… the recent financial results will be less meaningful if the transaction is approved… we are eager to bring it to a close.” — Anthony C. Schnur, CEO .
- “We resumed our workover program in late June… returned several shut-in wells back into service, and… saw a resulting uptick in our production volumes.” .
- Plan to close acquisition and drill six initial wells; broader development potential across multiple sands (Hunton, Prue, Mississippi Lime, Woodford) .
Q&A Highlights
- No earnings call transcript or Q&A was available for Q2 2016. Disclosures were provided via 8‑K press releases and the 10‑Q filing .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus estimates (EPS, revenue) via S&P Global were not available for CEI for calendar Q2 2016. As a result, beat/miss assessment is not applicable (S&P Global data unavailable).
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Operational actions (workovers) began to reverse production declines; however, scale remains small and cost per barrel elevated due to LOE/workover intensity .
- The near‑term equity story hinges on closing the Hunton acquisition and associated financing, which would add ~1,000 BOE/d and a development inventory, and trigger rebranding to Camber Energy .
- Liquidity remains constrained (working capital deficit ~$10.9M), with explicit going‑concern disclosure; capital structure complexity (convertibles, debenture, warrants) is high and dilutive risk persists .
- Exchange listing risk emerged (NYSE MKT non‑compliance); management submitted a plan—timely progress on equity and asset transactions is a key listing and valuation catalyst .
- In absence of analyst coverage and estimates, trading is likely driven by transaction milestones (proxy vote, close, NYSE plan acceptance) and production updates from legacy workovers .
- Medium‑term thesis depends on capital discipline post‑close: executing six initial Hunton wells, managing LOE, and realizing identified multi‑sands optionality to scale production sustainably .
- Risk management: monitor debt maturities (Rogers loan), funding from preferred/convertible structures, and any delays in closing that could exacerbate liquidity pressure .
Sources: Q2 2016 press release and 8‑K ; Q2 2016 10‑Q financials and MD&A ; Q4 2015 press release ; NYSE MKT notice press release .