CA
CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 revenue rose slightly sequentially to $633.9M and shipments increased 1% to 168,672 tonnes; adjusted EBITDA was $78.0M, down modestly versus Q4 on higher energy and raw material costs .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, revenue was a significant beat ($633.9M vs $527.0M*), while adjusted EPS missed ($0.36 vs $0.59*) as onetime alumina cost timing and weather-driven power costs weighed; EBITDA vs consensus appeared lower given definitional differences (company-reported adjusted EBITDA of $78.0M vs SPGI EBITDA estimate of $86.0M*) .
- Q2 2025 guidance: adjusted EBITDA of $80–$90M, supported by a full-quarter Midwest premium uplift (expected $866/ton) and easing energy costs, partially offset by temporary maintenance and seasonal labor .
- Catalysts: strengthened U.S. Section 232 tariffs (25%) lifting Midwest premium and domestic demand, liquidity up to $339.1M, and ongoing Jamalco cost-improvement program; management expects sustained premium strength and continued deleveraging .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Premiums and LME pricing: Realized Midwest premium averaged $602/ton (+38% q/q) and realized LME averaged $2,553/ton, supporting top-line resilience despite input headwinds .
- Liquidity and leverage: Liquidity increased to $339.1M and net debt fell by $55M, aided by working capital reduction and strong operating performance .
- Iceland operations and contracts: Grundartangi returned to full production post-curtailments; ON Power PPA extended through Q1 2032; management: “we reached an extension… ON Power to continue to supply the plant into 2032” .
-
What Went Wrong
- Energy and raw materials: Polar vortex-linked spikes raised U.S. energy costs; alumina and other raw materials were a $27M q/q headwind; Q1 adjusted EBITDA decreased $2.9M q/q .
- Onetime costs and derivatives: Emergency energy charges at Mt. Holly ($3.5M) and unrealized derivative losses ($3.0M net of tax) depressed GAAP EPS; adjusted net income fell to $36.6M .
- European billet demand: Softer-than-anticipated billet orders in Europe pressured Grundartangi value-add mix; only a “small uptick” entering Q2 (watch for trend confirmation) .
Financial Results
Margins (S&P Global data; company-reported definitions may differ)
Values with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Vs. Wall Street Consensus (S&P Global)
Values with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment/Geography KPIs
Other KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Century generated $78 million of adjusted EBITDA in the first quarter, driving a reduction in net debt of $55 million and increasing liquidity by $94 million.”
- “Realized LME prices averaged $2,553 in Q1, while realized Midwest and European premiums averaged $602 and $336… Regional premiums have seen the most movement so far in Q2 with spot Midwest premium today sitting at close to $850 a ton….”
- “We reached an extension agreement… ON Power to continue to supply [Grundartangi] into 2032.”
- “We expect Q2 adjusted EBITDA in the range of $80 million to $90 million… lagged U.S. Midwest premium… $866 per ton, up $265.”
- “The outage [Sebree carbon plant] will drive a onetime increase in maintenance spend in the second quarter of about $10 million.”
- “We strongly support today’s Executive Order… imposing a 25% tariff to stop the flood of aluminum imports into the United States.”
Q&A Highlights
- One-time OpEx clarification: “Incremental OpEx costs of $10–$15M… that should be onetime in Q2.”
- Alumina timing: Q1 alumina headwind largely timing of high-priced vessel sales; prices fell into Q2 .
- 45X cash timing: Expect ~$60M cash receipt for FY’23 in Q2; remaining ~$20M later this year or early next .
- Capital allocation: Priority remains debt reduction alongside ongoing CapEx at Jamalco .
- New smelter milestones: Finalize power and site selection next; meaningful CapEx deployment likely post-2026 .
- Premium outlook: Management expects Midwest premium to stabilize in $0.45–$0.50 range as inventories normalize .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 results vs consensus: Revenue was a significant beat ($633.9M vs $527.0M*), adjusted EPS missed ($0.36 vs $0.59*). Only one estimate cited for Q1 revenue/EPS, increasing potential variance. EBITDA consensus ($86.0M*) is not strictly comparable to company-reported adjusted EBITDA ($78.0M) due to definition differences .
- Q4 2024 had revenue and EPS beats versus consensus ($630.9M vs $515.3M*; $0.49 vs $0.445*), reflecting strong alumina sales and premium support .
Values with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Tariff tailwind should be more fully reflected in Q2 via Midwest premium lag, supporting the $80–$90M adjusted EBITDA guide; watch realized premiums and inventory digestion .
- Near-term headwinds (raw materials, one-time maintenance and seasonal labor) are transitory; energy tailwinds and premium strength offset, tilting risk to the upside in H2 if premiums sustain .
- Liquidity improved to $339.1M; expected 45X cash inflows in Q2 enhance balance sheet flexibility and deleveraging capacity .
- Operational execution remains solid: Sebree reliability program and Grundartangi back to full production; Jamalco turbine project is a key 2026 cost catalyst .
- EPS variability stems from macro inputs (energy, alumina, derivatives); focus on adjusted EBITDA and cash generation as truer indicators of core performance .
- Strategic optionality: potential Mt. Holly restart analysis, Hawesville process, and greenfield U.S. smelter provide meaningful volume and margin optionality if premiums and policy stay supportive .
- For positioning, emphasize exposure to U.S. billet and value-add demand and tariff-supported Midwest premium; trade around quarterly input cost volatility and catalysts from premium prints and 45X cash receipts .