CG
China Green Agriculture, Inc. (CGA)·Q3 2017 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 FY2017 results were mixed: revenue rose 3.4% YoY to $81.3M on newly consolidated VIE distribution sales, while gross margin contracted 520 bps to 26.3% on lower pricing/mix and higher raw material/packaging costs .
- EPS of $0.21 and net income of $8.2M were essentially flat YoY; importantly, management highlighted an internal beat vs its prior Q3 guidance (EPS +$0.03, NI +$1.2M) and raised full-year revenue, net income, and EPS guidance ranges .
- Underlying core production weakness persisted: excluding VIEs, net sales fell ~24% YoY; Gufeng revenue declined 29.5% and Jinong declined 16.7% YoY, offset by VIE contribution (~26% of total) .
- Key watch items: steep increase in selling expenses at Jinong (64% of sales) and higher accounts receivable; positives include strong cash balance and sizable inventory normalization; catalysts include raised FY guide and ongoing channel expansion via VIE acquisitions .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Raised FY2017 guidance: revenue to $281–$301M (from $277–$300M), net income to $25–$29M (from $20–$27M), EPS to $0.65–$0.75 (from $0.52–$0.70) on 38.6M diluted shares; Q4 guidance set at revenue $80–$100M, NI $4–$8M, EPS $0.10–$0.21 .
- VIE-driven expansion: VIEs contributed ~$21.3M (26.3% of Q3 revenue) and supported total sales growth despite declines at core production units; management emphasized acquisitions in Heilongjiang and Anhui to build a national platform: “penetrating the six market areas… building one of the key production and distribution platforms in rural China” .
- Liquidity: cash and equivalents increased to $118.26M (+14.9% vs Jun-16), providing flexibility for working capital and M&A .
What Went Wrong
- Margin compression: gross margin fell to 26.3% (from 31.5% YoY) due to lower-margin product mix (especially at Gufeng), pricing, and higher raw material/packaging costs; Jinong GM 53.9% (from 57.7%); Gufeng mix tilted to lower-margin products .
- Selling expense surge: total selling expenses rose 78% YoY; Jinong’s selling expenses ballooned to 64.2% of segment sales (from 10.2%), reflecting intensified marketing and shipping, partially offset by a sharp reduction in amortization of deferred assets .
- Receivables risk: accounts receivable grew meaningfully with allowance increases; management leaned on channel/credit initiatives to mitigate collection risk; AR dynamics were a focal Q&A topic in prior calls .
Financial Results
Consolidated performance vs prior quarters
Q3 YoY comparison
Segment revenue and profitability (Q3 FY2017 vs Q3 FY2016)
KPIs (volume and pricing)
Notes: VIEs contributed $2.09M gross profit at ~9.8% GM in Q3; Gufeng’s product mix skewed to lower-margin SKUs; Jinong’s higher raw and packaging costs compressed GM .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “On January 1, 2017, Jinong completed the strategic acquisition of two companies… We are now penetrating the six market areas… moving quickly towards our goal of building one of the key production and distribution platforms in rural China.” — Zhuoyu Li, President .
- “Our performance… improved, generating $8.2 million net income in the third quarter… Looking ahead to the 2017 Fiscal Year, we expect revenue of $281 to $301 million; net income of $25 to $29 million; and EPS of $0.65 to $0.75, based on 38.6 million fully diluted shares.” — Tao Li, Chairman & CEO .
- Prior call framing: “Peak quarters normally are the third quarter and the fourth quarter… we acquired… wholesale companies… integrating them… wholesale segment will grow very rapidly… balance business portfolio with one hand on production, the other hand on wholesale.” — Tao Li (Q2 call) .
Q&A Highlights
Note: The Q3 FY2017 call transcript could not be retrieved; themes below reflect Q2/Q1 calls most relevant to Q3 results.
- Accounts receivable and collections: Management emphasized no change in collection policy and highlighted integration of wholesale/VIEs and external credit facilities to mitigate default risk while supporting growth .
- Seasonality: Management reiterated Q3/Q4 as peak quarters, aligning with the observed sequential revenue lift into Q3 .
- Strategy and M&A: Management detailed the rationale, structure, and expected benefits of VIE acquisitions (cash + convertible notes; geographic coverage; rapid expansion of wholesale channel) .
- Governance/procedures: Shareholder-meeting access protocols discussed in Q1 call Q&A context, indicating adherence to internal security procedures (non-financial, but noted by analysts) .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q3 FY2017 revenue/EPS was unavailable for CGA at the time of analysis; therefore, estimate comparisons could not be provided. We anchor to company-issued guidance and reported results instead (consensus unavailable via S&P Global).
- Q3 results vs company guidance (from Q2 release): revenue landed at the top end of the $72–$82M range; net income ($8.2M) and EPS ($0.21) exceeded the $4–$7M and $0.10–$0.18 guidance, respectively .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- VIE distribution strategy is working to offset core production declines, driving total sales growth and prompting a raised FY guide; sustainability depends on integration quality and margin control .
- Margin pressure remains the principal risk: mix/pricing and input costs compressed GM; watch Gufeng mix and Jinong input costs into Q4 seasonally strong quarter .
- Elevated selling expenses at Jinong (marketing push) bear monitoring; while amortization of deferred assets declined sharply, the underlying cash cost of sales/marketing rose materially .
- Receivables management is critical: AR and allowances rose; collection discipline, channel financing, and customer quality are key to preserving cash conversion .
- Balance sheet is strong (cash $118M) and inventory normalization reduces working-capital drag ahead of Q4; provides runway for selective M&A and operations .
- Near-term setup: Q4 guide implies sustained seasonal strength; execution on mix/pricing and expense control will determine whether raised FY targets are met or exceeded .
- Medium-term thesis: Platform-building via VIEs and policy tailwinds toward higher-quality ag inputs are positives; core production competitiveness and governance transparency remain areas to assess continuously .