CH
CLEAN HARBORS INC (CLH)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 was operationally solid in Environmental Services (ES) with record Q2 Adjusted EBITDA margin (21.7%) and strong incineration metrics, while consolidated revenue was flat year-on-year; Clean Harbors reiterated full-year Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted free cash flow guidance, signaling confidence into 2H25 .
- Against S&P Global consensus, revenue and EPS were modest misses (Rev: $1.55B vs $1.59B*, EPS: $2.36 vs $2.39*), reflecting softness in SKSS and lower large emergency response comps; margin execution and ES strength were the offsetting positives . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Management highlighted tailwinds from reshoring, PFAS remediation, and the Kimball incinerator ramp (met Q2 volume target), and guided Q3 Adjusted EBITDA growth of 9-12% YoY; full-year midpoints maintained ($1.18B Adj. EBITDA, $460M Adj. FCF) .
- Likely stock reaction catalysts: visible ES margin expansion durability, PFAS regulatory clarity, and progressive lift from Kimball and Phoenix hub investments; watch for SKSS execution on charge-for-oil and inventory cost tailwinds into 2H25 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- ES pricing and throughput drove another quarter of margin expansion; consolidated Adjusted EBITDA margin rose 60 bps to 21.7% with “outstanding” incineration utilization (89% ex-Kimball) and 7% mix-adjusted incineration price increase .
- Kimball ramp on track; unit hit its Q2 volume target and is expected to deliver incremental network EBITDA as utilization broadens to more waste types in 2H25 .
- Safety performance hit a company best: TRIR 0.40 in Q2 (0.45 in 1H25), reinforcing operational discipline and cost benefits, per management .
-
What Went Wrong
- Consolidated revenue was flat YoY; SKSS revenue was down vs prior year amid weak base oil pricing, though SKSS EBITDA outperformed management’s expectations due to CFO pricing and cost controls .
- Lower large emergency response activity year-on-year weighed on ES top line; management cited ~$24M of ER in Q2’24 vs ~$10M this quarter, although base business margins improved .
- Depreciation and amortization rose with Kimball and higher landfill volumes, modestly pressuring income from operations vs last year (Q2 op income $210.3M vs $215.5M) .
Financial Results
Overall results and estimate context
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Segment breakdown (Q2 YoY)
KPIs and operating metrics
Non-GAAP context: Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted free cash flow are non-GAAP; reconciliations provided by the company .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We improved our consolidated Adjusted EBITDA margin by 60 basis points from a year ago… and posted the best quarterly safety results in our history… TRIR of just 0.40” – Mike Battles, Co-CEO .
- “Incineration utilization, excluding the new Kimball incinerator, was outstanding at 89%… Average incineration price rose 7% on a mix-adjusted basis” – Eric Gerstenberg, Co-CEO .
- “We anticipate a strong second half… executing on pricing strategies, cost mitigation and operational efficiencies to drive further margin improvement” – Mike Battles, Co-CEO .
- “With $700 million in cash, low leverage… we’re in an ideal position to accelerate our growth and scale through both organic investments and strategic M&A” – Management .
Q&A Highlights
- Macro and pipeline: Management sees all-time high network volumes, strong multi-vertical pipeline, and believes it is likely taking share given national footprint; resilience despite slower industrial macro .
- Industrial Services: Turnaround count up ~15% YoY but back-half guidance does not rely on a significant ramp; potential upside if activity accelerates .
- SKSS: CFO shift and FIFO inventory roll-off to drive sequential profitability in Q3; confident in ~$140M 2025 Adj. EBITDA for the segment .
- PFAS: EPA/DoD incineration study supports high-temperature destruction with emissions well below standards; EPA guidance expected, with states already driving activity .
- Kimball: Tracking to ~28k tons in 2025 with incremental network EBITDA; start-up costs created a minor drag that should abate as throughput ramps .
Estimates Context
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Q2 2025 modestly missed revenue and EPS vs consensus; however, consolidated Adjusted EBITDA and margin execution were strong, suggesting Street models may need to reflect ES margin durability and SKSS CFO benefits into 2H25 .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- ES remains the engine: high utilization, price realization, and disciplined SG&A are underpinning sustained margin expansion even with lighter large emergency response activity .
- SKSS stabilization is progressing: CFO pricing and FIFO inventory dynamics point to sequential improvement into Q3/Q4; management reaffirmed ~$140M 2025 Adj. EBITDA .
- Guidance intact with added Q3 color: maintaining FY25 midpoints and calling for Q3 Adj. EBITDA +9–12% YoY suggests confidence in demand, pricing, and execution .
- Capacity-led catalysts: Kimball ramp and Phoenix hub replication should support volumes, network efficiency, and medium-term margin expansion .
- PFAS optionality: favorable testing and expected guidance could accelerate a multiyear, multi-billion opportunity, with Clean Harbors positioned for end-to-end solutions .
- Watch items: SKSS commodity exposure (base oil), tariff-related customer timing, and the cadence of industrial turnarounds—none of which are required for the current back-half guide .
- Tactical angle: Any pullbacks on modest top-line misses may be opportunities if ES margin trajectory, guidance durability, and PFAS/Kimball catalysts continue to firm up .
Source Citations
- Q2 2025 8-K and press release: .
- Q2 2025 earnings call transcript: .
- Q1 2025 press and call (trend, prior guidance): .
- Q4 2024 press and call (trend): .
Note: Consensus estimates denoted with an asterisk are Values retrieved from S&P Global.*