CI
Calumet, Inc. /DE (CLMT)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 revenue was $1.027B, above consensus, while GAAP net loss widened to $147.9M and basic EPS was -$1.70; Adjusted EBITDA was $55.1M and Adjusted EBITDA with Tax Attributes was $76.5M, supported by Specialties margin expansion and record cost reductions at Montana Renewables .
- Specialties delivered robust margins despite a planned month-long Shreveport turnaround; Montana Renewables’ operating cost fell to a record $0.43/gal, and the company is on track for 120–150MM gal/year SAF by Q2 2026 .
- Deleveraging accelerated: Stonebriar financing added $80M cash and an $80M redemption notice; in total, $230M of 2026 notes were called over the past few months, with management targeting $800M restricted-group debt longer term .
- Regulatory catalysts supportive: PTC extension and SRE decisions; Calumet later received EPA small refinery exemptions reducing the RIN accrual from 396MM to 89MM—potentially a positive for cash/liquidity trajectory .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Specialties margin expansion and volumes: “Robust margin expansion and strong volumes were demonstrated in our Specialties segment despite a planned, month-long turnaround at our Shreveport facility” .
- Montana Renewables cost leadership: Operating cost (ex-SG&A) fell to $0.43/gal, lowest since launch; management: “firmly established… one of the most competitively advantaged producers in the space” .
- Deleveraging progress: Stonebriar deal increased asset value to $120M and proceeds will redeem 2026 notes; management called a cumulative $230M of 2026 notes year-to-date .
-
What Went Wrong
- GAAP profitability pressured: Q2 GAAP gross loss of $43.6M and net loss of $147.9M, with heavy RINs mark-to-market impacts and turnaround effects .
- Montana Renewables segment still negative on Adjusted EBITDA (pre-tax attributes) amid “lowest industry margin” for renewable diesel, though improved YoY on with-tax basis .
- Rail service disruption increased logistics costs and complexity during the quarter, requiring alternative arrangements to keep customers supplied .
Financial Results
Estimates vs Actual (Q2 2025):
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Segment performance:
KPIs and operating metrics:
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “Our second quarter results reflect continued strength in our Specialties business, record operational performance at Montana Renewables, and meaningful cost reductions across the portfolio.”
- CEO: “MaxSAF™ expansion remains on pace, with 120–150 million gallons of SAF production expected online in the second quarter of 2026.”
- CFO: “We now will have called $230,000,000 of the 2026 notes in the last few months… We remain confident in our plan to reach our ultimate goal of $800,000,000 of restricted group debt.”
- CEO: On SAF market and pricing: “We continue to see SAF premiums in the previously reported $1 to $2 per gallon over renewable diesel range.”
- CEO: On PTC monetization: “We just signed a term sheet on about half of our credits… we historically projected that established tax credits sell for 95%–98% of their value.”
Q&A Highlights
- Renewable diesel mid-cycle earnings: Management points to proposed RVO implying 4.5–5.5B gal biomass-based diesel demand and historical margin ranges ~$1.50–$2.00/gal, with MR capable of $140–$150M Adjusted EBITDA with tax attributes at ~$1.50/gal, plus incremental SAF premium uplift .
- Balance sheet path: $230M of 2026 notes called; focus shifts to managing 2027 notes via strategic actions, restricted group FCF, and potential Montana Renewables monetization; liquidity ~$200M revolver .
- Cost reductions detail: Major driver was water minimization and efficiency; contractor reductions as internal teams matured; persistent OpEx per-gallon declines .
- SAF market/regional strategy: Attractive Midwest credits; flexibility serving West Coast and Canada via BNSF; diversified customer slate across fuelers, airlines, and credit buyers .
- Regulatory outlook: PTC extension; encouragement that half-RIN for imports (if implemented) would force RIN prices to adjust rather than imported feed prices falling; expectation for quicker PTC monetization in “near future” .
Estimates Context
- Revenue beat consensus in Q2 2025 (actual $1,026.6M vs $948.2M*), driven by Specialties margin expansion and strong volumes, plus improved MR throughput despite weak industry margins .
- EPS missed on S&P Primary EPS metric (actual -$0.400* vs -$0.215*), with company-reported GAAP basic EPS of -$1.70 reflecting notable RINs and turnaround impacts; analysts may need to adjust for non-GAAP, RINs mark-to-market, and tax attribute treatment going forward .
- EBITDA modestly below consensus (company Adjusted EBITDA $55.1M vs S&P EBITDA consensus 56.9M*), but Adjusted EBITDA with Tax Attributes reached $76.5M, signaling the growing role of 45Z credits in reported performance .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Specialties is the earnings anchor; margin discipline and fixed cost reductions yielded SPS Adjusted EBITDA margin 10.6%, with further gains likely as Shreveport turnaround benefits and rail normalization flow through Q3 .
- Montana Renewables cost position creates asymmetric upside when margins recover; record $0.43/gal OpEx and SAF premium ($1–$2/gal) support medium-term profitability as RVO/SRE clarity improves .
- Deleveraging is advancing, reducing near-term refinancing risk; Stonebriar cash and cumulative $230M note redemptions are meaningful signals of execution .
- Regulatory tailwinds are forming: PTC extension/transferability and SRE decisions clean up industry overhangs; potential RVO step-up could restore margins toward mid-cycle .
- Watch near-term catalysts: PTC monetization closings, MR monthly run decisions under weak RD margins, and 2H 2025 restricted group FCF delivery (~$50–$60M) .
- Estimate models should incorporate tax attributes and segment dynamics; using Adjusted EBITDA with Tax Attributes better aligns with how management and creditors evaluate performance .
- Trading implications: Revenue beat and structural cost progress vs headline GAAP loss create a mixed tape; stock reaction likely tied to signs of regulatory-driven margin normalization and concrete PTC monetization cash inflows .