Clearday, Inc. (CLRD)·Q2 2019 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2019 delivered no revenue as the company focused on pre‑production ramp for Conductus HTS wire; net loss widened to $2.6M (‑$0.57/share) vs. $1.5M (‑$1.24/share) YoY; cash ended at $2.5M after a May equity raise of ~$1.6M net .
- Management cited initial wire orders (including India’s Institute for Plasma Research) and began initial shipments post‑quarter; DOE NGEM Phase 2 expected to begin in Q4, positioning for “tens of kilometers” of shipments later in 2019 and ultimately “thousands” over the next few years .
- Operating expenses remained elevated amid ramp preparations, driving gross losses with zero revenue; going‑concern risk persists with runway into Q4 2019 absent material revenue or new capital .
- Nasdaq notified of minimum bid deficiency in July (180‑day cure period), a potential stock overhang; near‑term catalysts include DOE Phase 2 funding release and pace of commercial shipments .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- “Initial orders” received for Conductus high‑performance magnet wire (IPR in India and a startup targeting fusion) broadened the early customer base; management noted increasing fusion market entrants driving demand .
- Process improvements to prepare for high‑volume manufacturing were implemented, with initial deliveries against existing orders starting after quarter‑end .
- DOE NGEM project expected to enter Phase 2 in Q4 alongside TECO Westinghouse, MIT, and UNT, with synergies to commercial ramp of best‑in‑class 2G HTS wire .
What Went Wrong
- Zero revenue in Q2 vs. $0.79M in Q2’18; continued gross losses as fixed manufacturing costs flowed through COGS without offsetting sales .
- Net loss widened YoY to $2.6M (‑$0.57/share) from $1.5M (‑$1.24/share); operating expenses rose on R&D and ramp activities .
- Liquidity remains tight despite the May raise; cash declined to $2.5M with management expecting runway only into Q4’19 absent revenue inflection or additional capital; Nasdaq bid‑price notice increases listing risk .
Financial Results
Income statement and liquidity (chronological: Q4’18 → Q1’19 → Q2’19; YoY shown for Q2’18)
Notes: Q1/Q2 2019 and Q4 2018 had no revenue; Q2 2018 revenue was DOE contract-related .
Revenue composition and gross loss (Q2 2019 vs. Q2 2018)
Balance sheet and other KPIs
Guidance Changes
No formal quantitative guidance was provided. Management directional commentary:
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
We identified the Q2 2019 earnings call transcript (Aug 13, 2019) but the full text was not available in our document corpus; external sources host it: Marketscreener and Seeking Alpha . The following trend table synthesizes themes from Q4’18 and Q1’19 press releases vs. Q2’19 disclosures:
Management Commentary
- “We received initial orders for our Conductus high performance magnet wire from several customers, including the Institute for Plasma Research, India, and a startup… planning to disrupt the fusion market… We are encouraged by the traction we are gaining” — Jeff Quiram, President & CEO .
- “We… implemented process improvements to prepare for our ramp to high-volume manufacturing. Subsequent to quarter end, we started delivering initial quantities… [and] expect to ship 10s of kilometers of wire later this year” .
- “We anticipate… beginning in the fourth quarter Phase 2 of our Department of Energy project… focused on the deployment of components for Next Generation Electrical Machines” .
Q&A Highlights
We located the Q2 2019 earnings call transcript externally but could not retrieve the full text via our document tools; as a result, detailed Q&A themes and verbatim responses are not available for citation. Sources: Marketscreener and Seeking Alpha transcript listings .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus estimates were unavailable for CLRD/SCON due to missing mapping in our SPGI CIQ dataset; therefore we cannot provide S&P‑anchored estimate comparisons at this time (S&P Global data unavailable).
- Publicly available source (Barchart) shows Q2’19 EPS estimate of ‑$0.67 vs. reported ‑$0.57 (implying a ~$0.10 beat) and Q1’19 estimate of ‑$0.53 vs. reported ‑$0.70 (miss) .
Where estimates may need to adjust: Given zero revenue in Q2 and commentary pointing to initial shipments starting post‑quarter with “tens of kilometers” expected in 2H19, street models (where maintained) would need to reflect limited 2019 revenue recognition timing and ongoing gross losses during ramp .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near‑term revenue inflection hinges on execution of early Conductus shipments and conversion of evaluation orders/backlog; management disclosed initial deliveries post‑Q2 and “tens of kilometers” targeted in 2H’19 .
- Liquidity is the critical constraint: $2.5M cash at Q2‑end with runway only into Q4’19 absent revenue or additional capital; watch for financings and potential dilution .
- Operational leverage is negative at current volumes; fixed manufacturing overhead flowing through COGS with zero revenue drove gross losses—improving yields/throughput is essential to margin recovery .
- Regulatory/listing risk: Nasdaq minimum bid price deficiency notice introduces headline risk over the 180‑day cure window .
- Program milestone catalyst: DOE NGEM Phase 2 start in Q4’19 could validate technology and support commercial scaling narratives .
- Position sizing should reflect binary elements: funding access, customer acceptance ramp, and timing of revenue recognition.
- Trading setup: stock may be headline‑sensitive to DOE funding news, shipment updates, and any capital raise; risk/reward skewed to execution on commercialization path.
Appendix: Additional Context (Prior Quarters)
- Q1 2019: No revenue; net loss $(2.3)M; plans to begin deliveries in Q2 and ramp to tens of km later in 2019; cash $3.6M .
- Q4 2018: No revenue; net loss $(2.26)M; cash $5.6M; highlighted transition from performance improvement to production ramp; ~$2M DOE revenue recognized through Phase 1 .