Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Priyanka Garg

Executive Vice President—Portfolio and Asset Management at Claros Mortgage Trust
Executive

About Priyanka Garg

Executive Vice President—Portfolio and Asset Management at Claros Mortgage Trust (CMTG); age 49. Joined Mack Real Estate Credit Strategies (MRECS) in 2020 and serves as Managing Director, Head of Credit Strategies, and a member of the MRECS Investment Committee; 20+ years in real estate investing across leading platforms (Goldman Sachs Whitehall Funds, Perry Capital Real Estate Partners, Westbrook Partners, Treeview Real Estate Advisors). Education: B.S. Economics (Wharton), M.A. Education (Stanford GSE), M.B.A. (Stanford GSB) . Company performance context during her NEO tenure: TSR (value of $100 since 11/3/21 listing) fell to $35.72 in 2024 from $100.41 in 2023; 2024 net loss $(221.27)m and Distributable (Loss) Earnings $(95.65)m .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic impact
MRECS (affiliate and external manager to CMTG)Managing Director, Head of Credit Strategies; member, Investment CommitteeSince 2020 (5+ years as of 2025) Leads credit strategy and portfolio/asset management for externally managed mREIT platform
Treeview Real Estate AdvisorsLeadership positionsNot disclosed Advisory and asset management leadership in real estate
Westbrook PartnersLeadership positionsNot disclosed Investment management across real estate equity
Perry Capital Real Estate PartnersInvestment professionalNot disclosed Special situations and real estate investing
Goldman Sachs (Whitehall Real Estate Funds)Investment professionalNot disclosed Institutional real estate private equity

External Roles

No public company directorships or external board roles disclosed in the proxy .

Fixed Compensation

CMTG is externally managed; NEOs (including Garg) do not receive cash salary or bonus from CMTG. Cash compensation, if any, is paid by the Manager; CMTG does not maintain NEO severance or cash CoC programs and reimburses only certain non‑investment personnel costs (not applicable to Garg) .

YearBase salary ($)Target bonus (%)Actual bonus ($)Notes
2024No cash comp from CMTG for Garg; externally managed
2023Same as above
2022Same as above

Performance Compensation

CMTG grants time‑based RSUs under the 2016 Incentive Plan; no PSUs or options disclosed for Garg. Manager-level variable compensation uses discretionary assessment of Distributable Earnings (Loss), Net Income (Loss), and TSR (no fixed weights), while CMTG equity is time‑vested to promote retention .

  • 2024 RSU grant detail (time‑based):
    • Grant date: 3/25/2024; Instrument: RSUs; Units: 125,000; Grant-date fair value: $1,205,000; Vesting: 1/3 on 4/1/2025, 1/3 on 4/1/2026, 1/3 on 4/1/2027 (continued service required; dividend equivalents on unvested RSUs) .
  • Outstanding award vesting mechanics:
    • 2022 RSUs: remaining 1/3 vests 7/1/2025; accelerate on death/disability .
    • 2023 RSUs: remaining 1/3 vests 4/1/2025 and 1/3 vests 4/1/2026; accelerate on death/disability .
    • 2024 RSUs: vest on 4/1/2025, 4/1/2026, 4/1/2027; accelerate on death/disability .

Performance and payout context (company metrics used by Manager in discretion):

Metric202220232024
TSR (Value of $100 since listing)$97.63 $100.41 $35.72
Net Income (Loss) ($m)$112.06 $6.03 $(221.27)
Distributable Earnings (Loss) ($m)$194.35 $39.94 $(95.65)

NEO pay governance context:

  • 2024 say‑on‑pay support ~83% .
  • Independent comp consultant (Farient) engaged to size 2025 equity pool .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

ItemDetail
Total beneficial ownership88,461 shares (<1% of class)
Shares outstanding (record date 4/7/2025)139,362,657
Ownership as % of outstanding0.06% (computed: 88,461 / 139,362,657)
Unvested RSUs outstanding (12/31/2024)236,667 units; market value $1,069,735 at $4.52/share
OptionsNone held in 2024
2024 vesting activity78,333 RSUs vested; 14,983 net shares delivered after tax withholding (net share settlement)
Hedging/pledgingProhibited (no pledging, no hedging, no margin)
Executive ownership guidelinesNot disclosed (director guidelines only)

Employment Terms

  • External management: Executives are employees of the Manager or affiliates; CMTG pays management and incentive fees (2024: $36.23m) and reimburses certain expenses (2024: $4.31m); aggregate 2024 NEO cash comp paid by Manager was ~$3.1m (8.7% of fees) across NEOs (excludes non‑CMTG vehicles), highlighting primary pay sits at the manager level rather than CMTG .
  • Change-in-control and severance:
    • No disclosed severance multiples or cash CoC benefits for NEOs (CMTG has no employee NEOs; no severance programs) .
    • Equity treatment: If awards are not assumed or substituted at CoC, outstanding awards vest immediately; if assumed, normal schedule continues. Death or disability accelerates unvested RSUs in full .
  • Clawback: Dodd‑Frank compliant recovery policy covering Section 16 officers, applicable to time‑ and performance‑vesting equity .
  • Deferred compensation: Plan allows RSU settlement deferral; no NEO equity deferrals in 2024 .
  • Insider trading controls: Strict policy prohibiting hedging, pledging, options, and short sales .

Multi‑Year Compensation (CMTG grants only)

YearSalary ($)Bonus ($)Stock awards ($)Total ($)
20241,205,000 1,205,000
20231,130,000 1,130,000
20222,527,200 2,527,200

Grant detail (2024):

Grant dateInstrument# unitsGrant‑date fair value ($)Vesting
3/25/2024RSUs125,000 1,205,000 1/3 on 4/1/2025, 4/1/2026, 4/1/2027

Outstanding and vesting cadence (as of 12/31/2024):

  • Unvested RSUs: 236,667 units (includes remaining tranches from 2022, 2023, 2024 grants) .
  • Key upcoming vest dates: 7/1/2025 (final tranche of 2022 grant); 4/1/2025 and 4/1/2026 (remaining 2023 tranches); 4/1/2025, 4/1/2026, 4/1/2027 (2024 tranches) .

Performance & Track Record (Company context)

YearTSR (Value of $100 since 11/3/21)Net Income (Loss) ($m)Distributable Earnings (Loss) ($m)
2022$97.63 $112.06 $194.35
2023$100.41 $6.03 $39.94
2024$35.72 $(221.27) $(95.65)

Notes:

  • 2024 saw significant losses and TSR compression, impacting the value of outstanding equity; “compensation actually paid” for NEOs was negative on a mark‑to‑market basis due to stock price decline (see pay-versus-performance methodology) .

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Mix and leverage: Garg’s CMTG‑delivered pay is 100% equity (time‑based RSUs), supporting retention but offering limited direct performance linkage; Manager-level cash comp (salary/bonus) is discretionary vs. formulaic .
  • Metrics and rigor: Manager considered DE, Net Income, and TSR to inform variable pay but without fixed weighting or preset targets; CMTG awards are not PSU‑based, and no TSR or financial hurdles are embedded in grants .
  • Shareholder safeguards: Clawback adopted; hedging/pledging prohibited; say‑on‑pay support 83% in 2024 .

Risk Indicators & Red Flags

  • External management and fee structure (base and incentive fees), with limited transparency on individual manager‑paid cash comp; potential misalignment if manager incentives do not fully track CMTG TSR in down cycles .
  • 2024 performance deterioration (negative DE, steep TSR decline) elevates execution risk for credit, workout, and asset management outcomes .
  • Equity awards are time‑vested (not performance‑vested), which can mute pay‑for‑performance sensitivity relative to PSUs .

Employment Terms (Severance and CoC Economics)

TopicKey terms
Employment agreementNone disclosed; executive is employee of Manager .
Cash severanceNone disclosed; CMTG notes no severance arrangements for NEOs (externally managed) .
Equity – death/disabilityUnvested RSUs accelerate in full .
Equity – change in controlIf awards not assumed/substituted, they vest immediately before CoC; if assumed, continue per schedule .
ClawbackApplies to Section 16 officers; covers equity and other incentive compensation .
Hedging/pledgingProhibited .
Deferred compensationAvailable for RSU settlement deferral; no NEO deferrals in 2024 .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: Garg’s significant unvested RSU balance (236,667 units) and lack of hedging/pledging support alignment; however, time‑based RSUs (no PSUs) lessen performance sensitivity. Upcoming vest dates (4/1/2025, 7/1/2025, 4/1/2026) could create routine settlement flows (largely net share settlements for taxes vs. open‑market sales) rather than discretionary selling pressure .
  • Retention/transition risk: No cash severance or guaranteed CoC cash benefits; equity accelerates only on death/disability or if not assumed at CoC, otherwise continues vesting, which can promote continuity through transactions but isn’t a strong golden‑parachute risk .
  • Pay-for-performance: Manager-level incentives are discretionary (DE, Net Income, TSR considered) while 2024 results were weak; equity mark‑to‑market already reduced realized value, partially aligning outcomes. Investors may seek greater use of PSUs or explicit financial/TSR hurdles to tighten pay‑performance linkage .
  • Governance: Say‑on‑pay support (83%) suggests tolerable shareholder acceptance; clawback and anti‑pledging policies are positives. External management with sizable fee structure merits ongoing scrutiny of fee economics vs. shareholder returns, especially following a year of negative DE and TSR compression .