CE
CENTERPOINT ENERGY INC (CNP)·Q4 2017 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2017 reported diluted EPS was $2.99, driven by a $2.56/share tax reform benefit; on a guidance basis excluding tax reform, EPS was $0.33 vs $0.26 in Q4 2016 and $0.38 in Q3 2017, reflecting YoY improvement but sequential decline; management issued 2018 EPS guidance of $1.50–$1.60 and targeted 5–7% EPS growth in 2019–2020 .
- Consolidated revenues rose to $2.64B (+26.8% YoY), with Energy Services operating income surging to $67M from $9M on higher throughput and mark-to-market timing, while Electric T&D declined modestly and Natural Gas Distribution rose; consolidated operating income increased to $296M from $243M .
- Guidance catalysts: 2018 EPS midpoint implies ~6% growth from $1.37 guidance-basis 2017 excluding tax reform, plus ~$0.10 tailwind from lower effective tax rate; rate base CAGR projected ~8.3% through 2022 supported by ~$1.7B 2018 capex and robust regulatory recovery mechanisms .
- Balance sheet strengthened by tax-related equity uplift; adjusted FFO/debt was ~24% in 2017, expected to decline ~300 bps in 2018 due to tax cash flow impacts yet remain within target metrics; dividend increased 4% to $0.2775 quarterly with payout ratio ~72% on 2018 midpoint .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- “2017 was a strong year… guidance basis EPS without tax reform surpassed our EPS guidance range” with 18% YoY increase; Energy Services delivered strong results and Enable Midstream exceeded net income guidance .
- Natural Gas Distribution operating income rose to $328M (+8.2% YoY) on rate relief, customer growth, and favorable labor/benefit accounting; added >30,000 customers in 2017 .
- Rate base growth outlook improved (~8.3% CAGR through 2022); Houston Electric’s 5-year capex plan of $4.8B includes the $250M Bailey–Jones Creek project endorsed by ERCOT, supporting resiliency and capacity .
-
What Went Wrong
- Electric T&D segment operating income declined YoY (Q4 $121M vs $130M) due to lower equity return and higher O&M/depreciation; TDU operating income fell slightly YoY (full year $535M vs $537M) despite customer growth .
- Sequential EPS (guidance basis ex-tax) fell to $0.33 from $0.38 in Q3, reflecting lower equity returns, lower usage, and higher O&M, partly normalized by mechanisms with inherent lag .
- Tax reform reduces near-term cash flows (lower tax shield and amortization timing of excess deferred taxes), likely reducing adjusted FFO/debt by ~300 bps in 2018; management expects to remain within target credit metrics .
Financial Results
EPS Comparison (quarterly)
Q4 Revenue and Operating Income YoY
Segment Operating Income (Q4)
KPIs
Non-GAAP and adjustments: Q4 2017 included $0.09/share mark-to-market gains in Energy Services and $0.01 ZENS-related adjustments in arriving at guidance basis EPS, and a $2.56/share benefit from tax reform; YoY reconciliation tables furnished in EX-99.1 .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “2017 was a strong year… $1.37 per share [guidance basis excluding tax]… above the top end of the $1.25–$1.33 guidance range” and highlighted >70k utility customer adds, grid resilience in Harvey, and accretive CES acquisition .
- CFO: Provided detailed reconciliation—Q4 reported EPS $2.99; guidance basis $2.89; subtract $2.56 tax benefit to $0.33; noted 2018 effective tax rate ~21% and anticipated ~300 bps FFO/debt decline from tax cash impacts while maintaining credit strength .
- Strategy: 2018 EPS guidance $1.50–$1.60; targeting 5–7% EPS growth in 2019–2020; capex plans support ~8.3% rate base CAGR; equity issuance not anticipated in 2018 .
Q&A Highlights
- Enable monetization cadence and credit metrics: No 2018 sale required; future unit sales will be market- and use-of-proceeds driven to strengthen balance sheet and utilities investment; private placements capped at 5% to one buyer .
- Capex drivers: Load growth and the $250M Bailey–Jones Creek project drive increased electric capex in 2018–2021; majority spend in 2020 for the project .
- Regulatory lag: Mechanisms (TCOS, DCRF) keep lag to ~6–12 months for capital; O&M growth assumed to align with residential sales growth .
- Tax/cash taxes: Cash tax rate to approximate or be below 21% provision in forecast; not a full cash taxpayer over next 4–5 years .
- Dividend policy and payout: Board reviews quarterly; intent to grow dividend, acknowledging lower growth than EPS to retain capital for utility investment .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q4 2017 EPS and revenue was not retrievable at this time due to access limitations; consequently, we cannot quantify a beat/miss vs consensus for the quarter. Values from S&P Global were unavailable.
- Management’s 2018 guidance midpoint implies ~6% growth off $1.37 guidance-basis 2017 EPS excluding tax reform, plus ~$0.10 EPS uplift from lower tax rate, suggesting upward estimate revisions in unregulated segments may be warranted .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Underlying Q4 performance (ex-tax reform) was solid YoY ($0.33 vs $0.26), but sequentially softer vs Q3 ($0.38), mainly from lower equity returns and higher O&M/depreciation; watch utility margin trajectory as mechanisms catch up .
- 2018 EPS guidance ($1.50–$1.60) and 5–7% growth targets for 2019–2020 are underpinned by robust capex and rate base CAGR (~8.3%); regulatory frameworks remain favorable across TX and gas jurisdictions .
- Tax reform is a near-term cash flow headwind but a P&L tailwind (~$0.10 EPS in 2018); balance sheet strengthened by tax-related equity uplift, with adjusted FFO/debt expected >20% despite ~300 bps decline .
- Energy Services’ outsized Q4 contribution (OI $67M) benefited from mark-to-market timing and throughput; model 2018 CES OI at $55–$65M per management, with less volatility as timing normalizes .
- Enable monetization remains a medium-term lever; 2018 plan does not require sales; expect opportunistic multi-year reduction with sensitivity to capital markets—maintain flexibility in modeling midstream EPS contribution ($0.46/share at Enable midpoint) .
- Dividend policy consistent 4% raises; payout ratio trending to ~72% at 2018 midpoint; incremental utility growth funded without common equity issuance in 2018 .
- Trading implications: Near-term sentiment supported by explicit 2018 EPS guide and dividend increase; monitor regulatory filings (TCOS/DCRF, NGD cases) and CES mark-to-market to gauge quarterly volatility and potential catalysts .