CC
Cineverse Corp. (CNVS)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 FY2025 delivered record results driven by Terrifier 3: revenue $40.7M (+207% YoY), direct operating margin 48%, net income to common $7.0M, adjusted EBITDA $10.8M .
- Management stated results beat Street consensus: revenue $40.7M vs $36.4M, diluted EPS $0.34 vs $0.31, net income $7.2M vs $5.1M, and adjusted EBITDA $10.8M vs $8.2M .
- Balance sheet strengthened: as of 12/31/24 cash $6.1M and line of credit outstanding $3.8M, with post-quarter cash >$13M and zero debt; working capital surplus $6.8M .
- Catalysts: continued Terrifier 3 ancillary monetization (EST/VOD, physical media, Screambox), slate expansion (Toxic Avenger 8/29/2025, Silent Night Deadly Night, Wolf Creek: Legacy), and accelerating ad-tech/AI monetization (Matchpoint, cineSearch) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Record financial performance: “strongest quarter in the company's history” with $40.7M revenue, $7.2M net income, $10.8M adjusted EBITDA; direct operating margin within 45–50% target .
- Terrifier 3 economics and marketing model: highest-grossing unrated film ever ($54M domestic box office) achieved on ~$500k P&A via owned ecosystem and Bloody Disgusting virality; driving Q3 and expected Q4 upside .
- Platform engagement and diversification: monthly viewership up 47% YoY; podcast and related revenues up 39% YoY; ad platform Cineverse 360 hit record direct-sold revenue month in October .
Management quotes:
- CEO: “We had the strongest results… $40.7 million in revenues… $7.2 million in net income… adjusted EBITDA $10.8 million… completely debt free… approximately $13 million in cash-on-hand” .
- President/CSO: “Our streaming audience surged 47% year-over-year… biggest direct sold ad revenue period to date… rapidly building a slate… technology-powered entertainment company with a decade-long head start” .
What Went Wrong
- SG&A increased $3.0M (+47% YoY) in Q3, largely Terrifier 3 related, with management expecting normalization going forward .
- Programmatic advertising still scaling: podcast monetization relied heavily on programmatic with 50–55% fill rate; bundling to improve CPMs and fill rates but ramp remains in progress .
- Prior quarter softness underscores volatility: Q2 revenue $12.7M with operating loss and adjusted EBITDA $0.5M; Terrifier 3 upside only began in Q3 .
Financial Results
Consensus comparison (Management-stated vs Actual):
KPIs
Financial condition trend
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO (Chris McGurk): “We had the strongest results… $40.7 million in revenues… $7.2 million in net income… $10.8 million in adjusted EBITDA… completely debt free… approximately $13 million in cash-on-hand” .
- CEO on slate economics: “All three… have very strong risk/reward profiles… total investments for both acquisition and marketing costs expected to be less than that of Terrifier 3… driven by our unique blueprint” .
- President/CSO (Erick Opeka): “Our streaming audience surged 47% year-over-year… biggest direct sold ad revenue period to date… We are a technology-powered entertainment company with a decade-long head start” .
- CFO (Mark Lindsey): “We were still able to beat analyst consensus guidance for revenue $40.7 million versus $36.4 million; net income $7.2 million versus $5.1 million; diluted EPS $0.34 per share versus $0.31; and adjusted EBITDA of $10.8 million versus $8.2 million” .
Q&A Highlights
- Release footprint: Target ~1,500–2,500 screens; avg ~2,000 screens per targeted IP releases .
- Genre expansion: Beyond horror into family, comedy, urban—leveraging channel/podcast footprint for targeted marketing .
- Film economics: Total investment per film (acquisition + marketing) targeted below Terrifier 3’s “~$5M”; partners like STUDIOCANAL can halve project risk .
- Tech monetization: cineSearch backend commercialization expected next fiscal year; Matchpoint ACV ranges from low six figures (SMB) to “many multiples” for enterprise .
- Podcast monetization: Programmatic fill rates ~50–55%; omni-channel bundling drives CPMs into high-teens/low-20s, with goal to push programmatic share below 50% in 18–24 months .
- Subscription revenue trajectory: Aim to accelerate growth to 15%+ in 2025 .
Estimates Context
- We attempted to pull S&P Global consensus for Q3 FY2025 but were unable to retrieve due to request limits; therefore, we reference management’s call-stated consensus and beats (revenue $36.4M, diluted EPS $0.31, net income $5.1M, adjusted EBITDA $8.2M) .
- Given the magnitude of upside vs management-cited consensus, Street models likely need to raise near-term revenue, EBITDA, and EPS, particularly for Q4 FY2025 given ongoing ancillaries, SVOD window, and potential Pay-1 licensing .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q3 marked an inflection to profitability with robust cash generation prospects; direct operating margin within targeted band and adjusted EBITDA scaled meaningfully—supporting thesis of an asset-light, ecosystem-driven studio model .
- Terrifier 3 validates hyper-targeted, low-P&A releasing playbook; slate additions with proven IP (Toxic Avenger, Silent Night Deadly Night) provide repeatability and upside with constrained risk capital .
- Advertising monetization transitioning from programmatic to direct omni-channel bundles is lifting yields; continued integration of ad-tech (Cineverse 360) should expand margin and revenue durability .
- AI commercialization (Matchpoint, cineSearch, training rights) presents a new revenue vector with enterprise-scale ACVs and multi-year deals; expect contribution to build through FY2026 .
- Liquidity and capital strategy derisked near term: debt-free post quarter, >$13M cash, no equity issuance planned; exploring non-dilutive financing to fund slate .
- Near-term trading implications: Continued ancillary monetization and Q4 guidance of “material increase” vs prior year should support upward estimate revisions and sentiment; watch for concrete Pay-1 deals and slate milestones .
- Medium-term: Execution on 8–10 releases/year, sustained 45–50% direct operating margins, and scaling ad-tech/AI revenues underpin a multi-pronged growth thesis, though SG&A discipline and programmatic-to-direct transition remain key watch items .