Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Janis Smith-Gomez

Director at Envoy Medical
Board

About Janis Smith-Gomez

Independent Class II director since 2023; age 58; seasoned med‑tech marketing executive with 30+ years across Johnson & Johnson (Ethicon, Global Brand Experience) and prior roles at Mars, Kraft, PepsiCo, and Booz Allen. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Business and an MBA from the University of Chicago, and is profiled as a strategic commercial leader focused on brand relevance and growth in medical devices .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureNotable Impact
Johnson & Johnson (Medical Devices)VP, Global Brand Experience2018–2022Led brand identity evolution for $27B med‑tech business to a patient‑centered, digitally powered model
Ethicon (J&J)VP, U.S. Marketing2014–2018Returned business to growth; strengthened customer engagement and launch excellence
Mars, IncorporatedVP, MarketingPre‑2006 (prior to J&J)Consumer brand leadership
Kraft FoodsSenior DirectorPre‑2006Marketing leadership
PepsiCoDirector of MarketingPre‑2006Marketing leadership
Booz, Allen & HamiltonConsultantEarly careerStrategy consulting foundation

External Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
The Honey Pot Company (subsidiary of Compass Diversified)Independent DirectorCurrentGovernance oversight for consumer health portfolio company
New York Academy of MedicineTrusteeCurrentNon‑profit oversight
Black Public MediaTrusteeCurrentNon‑profit oversight
Kent Place School; Citymeals on Wheels; Vanderbilt Parents & Family AssociationTrustee/Board memberPriorCommunity and education governance

Board Governance

  • Independence: Determined independent under Nasdaq Listing Rules; Board has majority independents .
  • Committee assignments: Audit Committee member (with S. Kantor—chair—and M. Patel); Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee member (with S. Kantor and C. Brynelsen) .
  • Attendance and engagement: All directors other than G. Taylor attended ≥75% of Board and committee meetings in 2024; Audit Committee met in executive session each regular meeting; Smith‑Gomez attended the 2024 Annual Meeting .
  • Tenure/term: Class II director; stood for re‑election at the May 28, 2025 Annual Meeting to serve through the 2028 annual meeting .

Fixed Compensation

MetricFY 2024
Annual cash retainer ($)$40,000
Committee chair fees ($)Not disclosed
Meeting fees ($)Not disclosed
Option/stock awards (grant‑date fair value, $)$0
Total director compensation ($)$40,000

Program note: Company intends to grant annual restricted stock to non‑employee directors; details (amounts, vesting) “not yet determined” and subject to plan limits .

Performance Compensation

ComponentFY 2024 GrantVesting SchedulePerformance Metrics
RSUs/Deferred StockNot disclosedNot disclosedNot disclosed
PSUsNot disclosedNot disclosedNot disclosed
OptionsNone reported for Smith‑Gomez in 2024N/AN/A

Other Directorships & Interlocks

Company/EntityPublic/PrivateRolePotential Interlock/Notes
The Honey Pot CompanyPrivate (CODI subsidiary)Independent DirectorSubsidiary of Compass Diversified; no disclosed COCH transactional linkage
Non‑profits (NYAM; Black Public Media)Non‑profitTrusteeNo issuer conflict disclosed

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Med‑tech commercialization and brand strategy; led large‑scale brand transformation in devices .
  • Executive experience across global consumer and healthcare brands (J&J, Mars, Kraft, PepsiCo) .
  • Governance experience on corporate and non‑profit boards; stakeholder insights focus .
  • Audit Committee service alongside a designated “financial expert” (S. Kantor), enhancing oversight depth .

Equity Ownership

MetricApr 10, 2025Oct 2, 2025
Total beneficial ownership (shares)16,146 13,021
Ownership (% of outstanding)<1% <1%
Composition detailIncludes 16,146 shares via stock options Includes 13,021 shares via stock options
Hedging/pledging policyDirectors prohibited from margin accounts and hedging/monetization transactions under Insider Trading Policy

Governance Assessment

  • Strengths

    • Independent director with deep med‑tech commercialization expertise; sits on Audit and Nominating & Governance, directly tied to key oversight functions .
    • Documented engagement: attended 2024 Annual Meeting; overall Board/committee attendance ≥75% (except one director) indicates functional engagement cadence, with regular audit executive sessions .
    • Board structure: separate Chair and CEO roles; majority independent board .
  • Risks and potential conflicts

    • Controlling shareholder exposure: Glen A. Taylor beneficially owned ~55.8% (Apr 10, 2025) and ~51.8% (Oct 2, 2025) of Class A Common Stock; related party financing and facility lease with Taylor‑controlled entities may constrain minority investor influence and raise conflict review demands .
    • Voting and Warrant Extension Agreement: Taylor parties agreed to vote in favor of proposals to ensure Nasdaq compliance through Dec 31, 2028 (binding on transferees), concentrating voting power on specified matters; requires robust independent oversight .
  • RED FLAGS

    • Related‑party financings: Three notes totaling up to $30M with GAT Funding (Taylor‑controlled) at 8% interest; associated warrant grants; plus facility lease with Taylor Corporation—heightened need for independent review and full Audit Committee scrutiny .
    • Concentrated control: Majority ownership by Taylor can override standard governance signals; independent directors’ committee processes must demonstrate proactive management of conflicts .
  • Alignment signals

    • Smith‑Gomez’s personal equity stake is modest (<1%); however, company policy restricts hedging/margin use, reducing misalignment risks; planned equity grants for non‑employee directors may improve alignment once implemented .
    • No delinquent Section 16 filings disclosed for Smith‑Gomez in 2024, suggesting baseline compliance discipline .

Implication: Given majority control and ongoing related‑party transactions, Smith‑Gomez’s effectiveness hinges on active Audit and Nominating & Governance committee oversight (related‑party reviews, board evaluations, director compensation framing) and transparent disclosure—key to sustaining investor confidence despite structural control risks .