Coronado Global Resources Inc. (CODQL)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 topline fell sharply as met coal prices slumped: revenue was $449.2M, down 19% QoQ and 33% YoY; realized met price declined to $151.3/t as PLV HCC averaged $185/t in the quarter .
- Results missed S&P Global consensus: Revenue $449.2M vs $519.6M estimate; EPS -$0.57 vs -$0.33; EBITDA -$72.8M vs -$11.6M as weaker pricing and shipment delays weighed; 1 estimate contributed to revenue/EPS consensus (interpret with caution).*
- Liquidity actions intensified: total liquidity $325.1M (cash $229.7M, ABL availability $95.7M) with lenders extending covenant waivers while Coronado pursues an ABL restructure and other options; management is also seeking timing relief on Stanwell rebate and royalties .
- H2 catalysts: Mammoth and Buchanan expansion projects are on track (Buchanan ~90% complete), expected to lift volumes and lower capex/costs; additional cost and capital reductions of “up to $100M” targeted for FY25 to preserve cash amid low pricing .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Execution resilience amid weather: ROM production was “on plan” despite heavy Queensland rainfall; prioritized met export production and began clearing timing-related shipment delays into Q2 .
- Expansion projects tracking: Mammoth ramping with second mining unit online in early April; Buchanan expansion ~90% complete, commissioning targeted for June quarter, expected to reduce costs and extend mine life 20+ years .
- Cost-focus and structural actions: Average mining cost per tonne improved vs prior year; management announced up to $100M further cost and capital reductions for FY25, including idling Logan surface operations and phasing Buchanan development .
- CEO: “We will deliver material volume increases in H2 as our high-return Mammoth and Buchanan growth projects are on schedule.”
What Went Wrong
- Price and mix pressure: Group realized met price fell to $151.3/t, -7% QoQ; PLV HCC index down 9% QoQ; lower pricing and some timing delays reduced revenue .
- Liquidity constraints and financing risk: Liquidity at $325M with an ABL waiver requiring minimum cash; lenders can alter terms, and management is pursuing restructuring/new facilities .
- Earnings under pressure: March-quarter revenue declined to $449M (-19% QoQ, -33% YoY) on weaker index pricing; consensus misses on revenue, EPS, and EBITDA reflect operating leverage to prices and shipment timing slippage into Q2 .*
Financial Results
Headline P&L vs prior quarters
Notes: “—” not disclosed in the quarterly activities reports. Asterisked values are from S&P Global; Values retrieved from S&P Global.
YoY revenue reference: Q1 2025 total revenues $449.2M vs Q1 2024 $668.1M (down 32.8%) .
Segment revenue (geography)
KPIs and operating metrics
Results vs S&P Global consensus (Q1 2025)
Asterisked values are from S&P Global; Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Why the miss: lower realized pricing (PLV HCC avg $185/t in quarter), shipment delays (co-shipper, rail, ship loader) that are expected to recover in Q2, and prioritization shifts (export met vs domestic thermal) .
Guidance Changes
No formal quantitative revenue, margin, tax, or segment guidance was provided in Q1 2025 quarterly filings/call; commentary centers on cost discipline, project timelines, and liquidity .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO framing on resilience and H2 setup: “We executed to plan… costs reduced significantly… we will deliver material volume increases in H2 as our high-return Mammoth and Buchanan growth projects are on schedule.”
- Market view and H2 outlook: Q1 prices near marginal-cost support, early signs of recovery in late April; confidence in H2 improvement driven by ex-China steel recovery, tariffs on Chinese exports, supply rationalization, and Indian demand .
- Liquidity priorities: “We continue to pursue all options… restructure the ABL… engaging with Stanwell and the State Government about temporarily extending payment terms… actions… are intended to improve near-term liquidity.”
- CFO pricing sensitivity: “Every $1 change in the [PLV] index is worth $8–$9 million of revenue and cash for the rest of the year.”
Q&A Highlights
- ABL facility path: Multiple restructuring/replacement options “quite advanced;” cost likely higher but “palatable” vs liquidity benefits; preference to keep ABL structure for execution speed; basket capacity under notes provides flexibility .
- Waiver constraints: Temporary minimum $100M cash requirement exists under current waiver until May 31; prepaid financing structures permissible under ABL .
- Cash headwinds: Monthly Stanwell rebate ≈$7M at current prices; state royalties ≈$10M/month; working to rephase timing with counterparties/government .
- Cost levers: $100M cost/capex reduction plan includes idling Logan surface ops (undergrounds continue), rephasing Buchanan development, and further fleet reductions at Curragh .
- Breakeven discussion: Management refrained from providing a PLV cash breakeven; reiterated focus on cost-out and benefit from H2 capex roll-off and project ramp .
- Mammoth ramp cadence: 3 continuous miners in 2025; the second started early April, third in July; secondary mining from 2026 could provide low-cost uplift .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus (limited coverage: 1 estimate) vs actual Q1 2025: Revenue $519.6M est. vs $449.2M actual; EPS -$0.33 est. vs -$0.57 actual; EBITDA -$11.6M est. vs -$72.8M actual. Expect downward estimate revisions near term unless PLV HCC continues to firm and shipment timing reversals lift Q2 .*
- Forward setup: Management expects volumes to step up in H2 and capex to fall post-commissioning, implying potential positive estimate revisions in H2 if pricing stabilizes/improves as indicated .
Asterisked values are from S&P Global; Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Near-term earnings remain highly sensitive to PLV HCC; each $1/t move ≈$8–$9M revenue/cash lever (H2 biggest exposure as volumes lift) .
- H2 setup is materially better: Mammoth and Buchanan add low-cost tonnes; capex rolls off; timing slippage from Q1 expected to unwind in Q2 .
- Liquidity is the swing factor: $325M available, but waiver constraints and cash backing reduce flexibility; ABL restructuring and timing relief on rebates/royalties are key watch items for multiple expansion .
- Structural cost actions are accelerating (up to $100M FY25): idling Logan surface ops, rephasing development, and supplier negotiations at Curragh; monitor realized unit costs through Q2–Q3 .
- Stanwell overhang eases from 2027 (rebate and discounted volume step-down), a medium-term catalyst for margins/cash conversion .
- Trading lens: Q2 could see partial rebound on shipment timing and PLV HCC uptick from late April; however, sustained valuation re-rating likely requires visible ABL resolution and confirmation of H2 volume/capex trajectory .
Additional Notes on Sources
- 8‑K Item 2.02 furnished Q1 2025 ASX quarterly activities report, including production/sales, realized pricing, and liquidity data .
- Prior two quarters’ ASX quarterly activity reports accessed via 8‑Ks dated Jan 22, 2025 (Q4 2024) and Oct 28, 2024 (Q3 2024) .
- Q1 2025 earnings call transcript reviewed in full for management commentary, liquidity detail, and project status .
- Other press releases in Q2 2025 window: none found in repository for CODQL (Apr 1–Jun 30, 2025) [ListDocuments: press-release returned 0].