CI
CARTERS INC (CRI)·Q2 2026 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 results showed stabilizing top-line with net sales $585.3M (+3.7% YoY) and a revenue beat vs S&P Global consensus, but profitability materially compressed: GAAP EPS $0.01 and adjusted EPS $0.17, both down sharply YoY and adjusted EPS missing consensus; adjusted operating margin fell to 2.0% from 7.0% a year ago .
- Management suspended FY25 guidance given leadership transition and significant tariff uncertainty; H2 FY25 net baseline tariffs are expected to reduce pre-tax earnings by ~$35M, with a plan to offset fully in 2026 through pricing, vendor cost-sharing, and mix shifts .
- Direct-to-consumer momentum continued: U.S. Retail comps +2.2%, with strong Baby category growth and improving traffic and conversion; International strength (Canada comp +8%, Mexico comp +19%) partially offset wholesale mix pressure .
- Capital allocation shifted: dividend paid in Q2 was $0.25 per share vs $0.80 in Q1; no buybacks in H1 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Direct-to-consumer comps improved: U.S. Retail comparable net sales +2.2%; management cited momentum in store traffic, conversion, and demand for core Baby apparel .
- International segment outperformed: net sales +14.1% YoY; Canada comp +8%, Mexico comp +19%; Brazil wholesale demand strong .
- Baby category strength: Carter’s Baby sales grew +10% YoY in Q2 in owned channels; higher-AUR “best” products (e.g., PurelySoft, Little Planet) resonated, underpinning strategy to lean into premium assortments .
- CEO tone: “We are encouraged by improving business trends… Returning Carter’s to long-term, sustainable, and profitable growth is our highest imperative,” reinforcing brand-led product and pricing strategy .
What Went Wrong
- Profitability collapsed: GAAP operating income fell to $4.0M (0.7% margin); adjusted operating income $11.8M (2.0% margin), reflecting pricing investments, new/remodeled stores, operating model improvement and leadership transition costs, and higher performance-based comp .
- Gross margin pressure and SG&A deleverage: CFO flagged gross margin down ~200 bps YoY (pricing investments, off-price clearance mix, higher inbound freight, FX); adjusted SG&A +10% due to store-related costs, higher comp, maintenance .
- Tariff headwinds: incremental baseline tariffs impacted Q2 modestly (~$2M GM headwind), but expected ~$35M net pre-tax hit in H2; management suspended FY25 guidance due to tariff uncertainty .
- Elevated tax rate: Q2 effective tax rate ~74% due to stock option expirations and Hong Kong global minimum tax implementation, further depressing EPS .
Financial Results
Headline Metrics (Oldest → Newest)
Actual vs S&P Global Consensus
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Segment Breakdown (Q2 2024 → Q2 2025)
KPIs and Operational Metrics (Oldest → Newest)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO Palladini: “Our second quarter sales performance showed stabilization and momentum… Returning Carter’s to long-term, sustainable, and profitable growth is our highest imperative” .
- CFO Westenberger on margins: “Gross margin… decreased… largest driver was our investment in pricing in U.S. retail… [and] higher inbound freight rates, and the net impact of foreign currency” .
- CFO on tariffs: “Our estimate of the additional baseline tariffs… $125M–$150M annually… we intend to raise our prices… and share [costs] with vendor and wholesale partners” .
- CEO on product focus: “Across U.S. stores and e-commerce, Carter’s baby category sales continue to accelerate… +10% in Q2 versus last year” .
- CFO on fleet: “~100 stores… will close as leases expire… we think there’s an operating income gain… as we transfer sales to the existing store base” .
Q&A Highlights
- Tariff offsets: Pricing is the most meaningful offset; vendor and wholesale cost-sharing underway; full mitigation targeted in 2026, though H2 FY25 will see ~$35M net impact after assumed offsets .
- Pricing cadence: Price increases began late June in wholesale; retail retains flexibility to “probe up”; consumers pay for added features in “best” assortments (PurelySoft, Little Planet) .
- Fleet closures timeline: ~100 doors closing over several years at lease expiry; minimal kickouts; expected OI benefit from sales transfer to remaining fleet .
- H2 mix and revenue trajectory: Plan for higher revenue growth led by DTC; international momentum to continue; 53rd week adds to H2 .
- Margin framing: AURs planned up in H2; pricing offsets only partially cover tariff headwind near-term; product cost investments in H2 also weigh on margins .
Estimates Context
- Q2 revenue beat: Actual $585.3M vs consensus $567.1M; U.S. Retail comps and International growth drove the outperformance .
- Q2 EPS miss: Adjusted EPS $0.17 vs consensus $0.374; margin compression from pricing investments, SG&A deleverage, and an unusually high tax rate (~74%) weighed on earnings .
- Q2 EBITDA miss: EBITDA $18.8M vs consensus $40.0M; reflects lower gross margin, mix shift to off-price clearance, higher freight .
- Prior quarters: CRI beat revenue and EPS in Q4 and Q1; Q4 adj EPS $2.39 vs $1.918 consensus; Q1 adj EPS $0.66 vs $0.516 consensus .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Top-line stabilization with a revenue beat is encouraging, but steep margin compression and an EPS miss shift focus to the pace and efficacy of pricing and cost offsets in H2 and into 2026 .
- Tariffs are the dominant near-term headwind; management plans to fully offset in 2026 via price increases, vendor sharing, and geographic production shifts—watch for evidence of price realization and unit elasticity in H2 .
- DTC momentum (comps +2.2%; Baby +10%) and international strength (Canada +8%, Mexico +19%) remain key positives that can underpin improved mix and AUR in H2 .
- Fleet optimization (~100 store closures) and new store segmentation analytics should raise store productivity and OI over time; monitor closure cadence and sales transfer efficacy .
- Capital allocation has turned more conservative (Q2 dividend $0.25 vs $0.80 in Q1); combined with suspended guidance, this indicates a near-term focus on liquidity amid tariff uncertainty .
- Trading lens: Expect sensitivity to tariff headlines and evidence of price increases sticking; beats on gross margin or signs of offset progress could catalyze upside, while further margin pressure or tariff escalations pose downside risk .
- Medium-term thesis: Brand equity in Baby and high-AUR premium assortments (PurelySoft, Little Planet) plus international growth and fleet discipline support the path to “long-term, sustainable, profitable growth” if tariff offsets materialize as planned in 2026 .