CR
COMSTOCK RESOURCES INC (CRK)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2024 delivered stronger cash generation and margins on higher realized gas prices and heavier hedging, despite lower volumes and a GAAP net loss driven by a $126.9M unrealized hedge loss; adjusted EPS was $0.16 and adjusted EBITDAX was $252M .
- Production fell 12% YoY to 124.2 Bcfe due to dropping two rigs early-2024 and a Q3 frac holiday; operating cost/MCFE improved to $0.72 and hedged operating margin reached 73% vs 67% in Q3 .
- Western Haynesville execution advanced: 6 new wells averaged 40 MMcf/d IP; cost/ft compressed meaningfully; 2025 plan lifts rigs from 5→7 with $1.0–$1.1B D&C and 46/46 wells drilled/turned (plus $130–$150M midstream funded by partner) .
- Management reinforced hedge protection (~50% in 2025 at ~$3.48) and balance sheet path to ≤1.5x leverage by 2026; potential long-term demand catalysts include LNG, data centers, Gulf Coast industry .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Hedging and pricing: Realized gas price improved to $2.70/Mcf with 51% hedged, lifting hedged operating margin to 73% (vs 67% in Q3) .
- Cost/margin execution: Production cost/MCFE fell to $0.72 (vs $0.77 in Q3) with improved EBITDAX margin; Q4 adjusted EBITDAX was $252M and operating cash flow $223M .
- Western Haynesville: 6 wells turned to sales at 40 MMcf/d average IP; drilling/completion cost-per-foot trending down; management: “golden age of natural gas is here” near LNG corridor .
-
What Went Wrong
- Lower volumes: Q4 production 124.2 Bcfe (down from 140.6 Bcfe in Q4’23) due to earlier rig drops and a Q3 completion pause .
- GAAP loss: Net loss $(55.3)M (−$0.19/sh) driven by a $126.9M unrealized hedge loss; without this, adjusted NI was $46.3M ($0.16/sh) .
- Free cash deficit: Despite higher OCF, Q4 free cash deficit after A&D was $(50.8)M due to elevated Q4 capital cadence and Western Haynesville/midstream build .
Financial Results
Segment/Revenue Mix
Key KPIs
Notes: Q4 GAAP net loss included a $126.9M unrealized derivative loss; adjusted NI was $46.3M ($0.16/sh) .
Guidance Changes
Q4’24 directional elements from Q3 call: production guidance 1,325–1,375 MMcf/d for Q4’24 (maintained context); DD&A $1.40–$1.55/MCFE; cash interest $54–$56M (Q4 only) .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategy and market positioning: “The golden age of natural gas is here and we're on the leading edge of technology to unlock the value of the Western Haynesville” (CEO) .
- Hedge protection: “We have approximately 50% of our gas production hedged for this year at an average price of $3.48 or better… For ’26, 59%… collars… $3.50 floor… ceiling $4.35… 41% swaps $3.51” (CFO) .
- Capital allocation and leverage: “We’re going to focus on getting our balance sheet back… 2026 will be a year… under 1.5x [leverage]” (CFO) .
- 2025 plan: “Increase the number of operating drilling rigs… from five to seven… spend approximately $1.0–$1.1 billion… drill 46… turn 46… spend $130–$150 million on [Western Haynesville] midstream” .
Q&A Highlights
- Cost reductions and repeatability: Management emphasized more runway to lower Western Haynesville drilling costs and consistent completion execution; Q4 Western drilling cost ~$1,396/ft and completion ~$1,315/ft with pad efficiencies to come .
- Horseshoe wells economics: ~23% capex savings vs short laterals; IRR “2–3x better” than short laterals, with similar performance to 10k-foot laterals (Ops/CFO) .
- Marketing/contracting: Considering direct LNG and power contracts; aim for a balanced offtake portfolio rather than a single buyer (CFO) .
- Midstream funding: Pinnacle JV expected to self-fund over time; potential for its own credit facility as EBITDA scales (CFO) .
- Activity pace and leverage targets: Comfortable at ~7 rigs; aim to reach ≤1.5x leverage in 2026 with stronger prices and production rebuild (CFO) .
Estimates Context
- We attempted to pull S&P Global consensus for Q4 2024 (EPS, Revenue, EBITDA) but encountered a temporary access limit (SPGI daily request limit). As a result, we cannot present a definitive beats/misses vs Wall Street consensus for this quarter at this time. If you’d like, we can refresh and add consensus comparisons once access is restored.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q4 quality improved: better realized pricing and hedging drove margin expansion; adjusted profitability returned despite lower volumes; the GAAP loss was driven by non-cash hedge marks .
- Western Haynesville moved from proof-of-concept to scaled delineation with 4 rigs; IPs (40 MMcf/d) and cost trajectories de-risk the asset ahead of LNG/power demand growth .
- 2025 is an investment/rebuild year: rigs rise to 7, $1.0–$1.1B D&C to position for medium-term growth; midstream funded externally limits capital strain .
- Hedges (~50% at ~$3.48 in 2025) and service cost relief should stabilize cash flows, with leverage trending lower; management targets ≤1.5x by 2026 .
- Horseshoe laterals are a material capital efficiency lever, potentially converting a sizable portion of short-lateral inventory into higher-IRR projects .
- Near-term trading: stock may key off gas price volatility and Western Haynesville cadence/cost updates; medium-term thesis hinges on LNG ramp, direct offtake progress, and sustained cost discipline (capex/midstream execution).
- Watch items: quarterly free-cash cadence amid higher capex, production rebuild timing, and continued cost-per-foot compression; reserve trajectory with higher price decks is constructive (7.0 Tcfe NYMEX case PV-10 $5.7B at YE’24) .
Sources: Q4’24 Form 8‑K and press release, Q4’24 earnings call transcript, prior Q2/Q3’24 8‑Ks and calls .